RobertH wrote on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:26:41 -0800:
> what do you think about the "general Timeout
>
> it is set to 300
>
> ive never much thought about it, yet should we be consider and possible
> reduce that one too?
I'm using 120, but I don't think reducing this value has much impact.
Kai
--
>
> > KeepAliveTimeout 150
>
>reduce this to 10 or 5.
>
>
> Kai
>
> --
> Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Kai,
what do you think about the "general Timeout
it is set to 300
ive never much thought about it, yet should we be consider and possible
reduce that one too?
- rh
___
Kai Schaetzl schrieb:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:52:59 +0100:
>
>
>> That really depends. If you only shove out static pages and have one or
>> two or three odd cgis on the machine, you can flatten down the httpd
>> binary quite a bit by throwing out unneeded modules.
>>
>> 5
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> There's your limit. However, you should check with your hardware if upping
>> it is really desirable. With 4 GB I think you won't be able to handle much
>> more anyway.
>
> That really depends. If you only shove out static pages and have one or
> two
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:52:59 +0100:
> That really depends. If you only shove out static pages and have one or
> two or three odd cgis on the machine, you can flatten down the httpd
> binary quite a bit by throwing out unneeded modules.
>
> 500 to 750 clients shouldn't be tha
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> There's your limit. However, you should check with your hardware if upping
> it is really desirable. With 4 GB I think you won't be able to handle much
> more anyway.
That really depends. If you only shove out static pages and have one or
two or three odd cgis on the machin
Linux-crazy wrote on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:09:38 +0530:
> KeepAliveTimeout 150
My god, reduce this to 10 or 5.
> ServerLimit 251
> MaxClients 251
There's your limit. However, you should check with your hardware if upping
it is really desirable. With 4 GB I think you won't be able to h
Am 21.01.2009 um 00:47 schrieb Jure Pečar:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:09:38 +0530
> linux-crazy wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am facing facing performance issues with our web servers which is
>> working for concurrent 250 requests properly and then stops
>> responding when the requests are more th
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:09:38 +0530
linux-crazy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am facing facing performance issues with our web servers which is
> working for concurrent 250 requests properly and then stops
> responding when the requests are more than 250 .
>
> ...
>
> Can any one guide me tuning to b
Jed Reynolds wrote:
>
> Merely increasing the number of workers might make performance worse.
>
> Use ps or top to figure out how much each apache worker is using. Then
> decide how much ram you want to dedicate on your server to Apache,
> without going into swap. (Over-allocating and then pagi
linux-crazy wrote:
> I want to know about the difference between worker MPM and
> Prefork MPM , how to find out which one will be used by my apache
> server and the recommended one for highly loaded server.If some one
> provide me the link that best explains above two comparison also be
linux-crazy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am facing facing performance issues with our web servers which is
> working for concurrent 250 requests properly and then stops
> responding when the requests are more than 250 .
Increase your MaxClients configuration, also enable if you
haven't already the ser
Am 20.01.2009 um 19:39 schrieb linux-crazy:
> Hi all,
>
> I am facing facing performance issues with our web servers which is
> working for concurrent 250 requests properly and then stops
> responding when the requests are more than 250 .
>
> The current configuration parameters are as follows
Hi all,
I am facing facing performance issues with our web servers which is
working for concurrent 250 requests properly and then stops
responding when the requests are more than 250 .
The current configuration parameters are as follows :
apachectl -version
Server version: Apache/2.0.52
Server
14 matches
Mail list logo
