On 7/21/20 12:22 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote:
On 7/21/20 9:59 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote:
I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've
found on the internet, but
On 7/21/20 9:59 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote:
I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've
found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest
that
I put "
> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
>>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote:
I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've
found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest
that
I put "umask 002" in /etc
On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote:
I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've
found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that
I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but t
> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote:
>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've
>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that
>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make
>> a difference. O
On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote:
> I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found
> on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put
> "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a
> difference. Othe
On 7/15/20 12:21 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Am 15.07.20 um 20:02 schrieb Emmett Culley via CentOS:
On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS mailto:centos@centos.org>> wrote:
Thanks for the info. I hadn't seen that before
Am 15.07.20 um 20:02 schrieb Emmett Culley via CentOS:
On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS
mailto:centos@centos.org>> wrote:
Thanks for the info. I hadn't seen that before nor many of the
links. I had seen the suggested sy
On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS mailto:centos@centos.org>> wrote:
Thanks for the info. I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links. I
had seen the suggested systemd fix, but have never been able got them to work.
An
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info. I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links. I
> had seen the suggested systemd fix, but have never been able got them to
> work. And I've tried many combinations. Still no luck.
>
> There has to be a
On 7/13/20 4:21 PM, Phoenix, Merka wrote:
I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet,
but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in
/etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.>>
Other's suggest a
>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found
>> on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put
>> "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a
>> difference.>>
>> Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.
I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the
internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002"
in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.
Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
