on 2-25-2010 1:44 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
> Hi all,
>
> I installed BackupPC on one of my Centos 5.4-machines following the wiki at
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC#head-725ed151d366bcf182cea92f765c373900cfc9dc,
>
> where BackupPC is installed from the c5-testing repo.
>
> r
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 5:53 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
>
>All repositories are hard to use
On 2/26/2010 2:20 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>>> epel is the best large 3rd party repo in terms of avoiding conflicts
>>> with the base.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, I noticed that with rpmforge. I was just under the impression that
>> epel was a bit "dodgy" as repos come. Never too late to be enlightened
>> th
>> epel is the best large 3rd party repo in terms of avoiding conflicts
>> with the base.
>>
>
> Yeah, I noticed that with rpmforge. I was just under the impression that
> epel was a bit "dodgy" as repos come. Never too late to be enlightened
> though. ;-)
>
the following is my opinion,
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:52 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
>
[...]
>> Looking more c
Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:06:11 -0600:
> I'm not sure there is any reasonable way to understand the state of 3rd
> party repositories. If there were, they'd probably fix their conflicts
> and avoid them in the future...
This wasn't what I referred to. He seemed to be unaware ab
On 2/25/2010 7:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Sorin, I've seen you posting on this list for a long time. There is no
> excuse that you don't know the simplest FAQs about CentOS.
I'm not sure there is any reasonable way to understand the state of 3rd
party repositories. If there were, they'd probab
On 2/25/2010 3:44 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I installed BackupPC on one of my Centos 5.4-machines following the wiki at
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC#head-725ed151d366bcf182cea92f765c373900cfc9dc,
> where BackupPC is installed from the c5-testing repo.
>
> r...@mach012 ~/ [0]#
Sorin, I've seen you posting on this list for a long time. There is no
excuse that you don't know the simplest FAQs about CentOS.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
>Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:50 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
>
>[...]
>
&g
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:44:40 +0100:
>>
>>> Doing the same search for RHEL5 gave me two packages (one for i386 and
>>> one for x86_64); v3.1.0-5.
>>
>> Not from Red Hat.
>
> No, from epel.
epel is just another third party repo.
>>> I thought all packages ava
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Kai Schaetzl
>Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:32 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 25
Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:44:40 +0100:
> Doing the same search for RHEL5 gave me two packages (one for i386 and one
> for
> x86_64); v3.1.0-5.
Not from Red Hat.
> I thought all packages available from the prominent American upstream
> provider
> got a treatment from the CentOS
Hi all,
I installed BackupPC on one of my Centos 5.4-machines following the wiki at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC#head-725ed151d366bcf182cea92f765c373900cfc9dc,
where BackupPC is installed from the c5-testing repo.
r...@mach012 ~/ [0]# rpm -qa backuppc
backuppc-3.1.0-1.el5.centos
r...
14 matches
Mail list logo
