Hi,
We are (still) mainly using CentOS 5 (5.8 x86_64). As CentOS / EL 5
standard OpenLDAP packages are rather old (2.3.x), we've been using LTB
OpenLDAP packages ( http://ltb-project.org/wiki/download#openldap),
which get installed in non-standard file system locations.
I am not much experienc
Le 2012-04-20 21:45, Nikolaos Milas a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We are (still) mainly using CentOS 5 (5.8 x86_64). As CentOS / EL 5
> standard OpenLDAP packages are rather old (2.3.x), we've been using
> LTB
> OpenLDAP packages ( http://ltb-project.org/wiki/download#openldap),
> which get installed in non
On 20/4/2012 11:10 μμ, fakessh wrote:
> look my personal rpm source of dovecot
> its more simply and stable
>
> http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.4-1.centme.el5.src.rpm
Thank you very much, I'll gladly check it.
Best regards,
Nick
___
CentOS mailin
On 20/4/2012 11:10 μμ, fakessh wrote:
> look my personal rpm source of dovecot
> its more simply and stable
>
> http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.4-1.centme.el5.src.rpm
Hi fakessh,
I was looking at your:
http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.8-1.centme.src.rpm package (after
adapting to bu
On 11/1/2013 1:44 μμ, fakessh @ wrote:
> I do not know the only thing I can tell you that laziness is a value in
> the computer
You are partly right.
However, IMHO building dovecot using standard openldap-devel on CentOS 5
means that, even though the final RPM works, it will use *ancient*
open
On 12/1/2013 11:09 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> ++ export LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -L/usr/local/openldap/lib64"
Or, more correctly:
export LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -L/usr/local/openldap/lib64 -lldap"
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lis
6 matches
Mail list logo
