On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 6:58 AM Chris Adams wrote:
> It isn't just databases - there are other things that backing up
> individual files one at a time is not so good. The best way to handle
> that is to freeze/snapshot the whole filesystem, and then back up the
> snapshot. This can be scripted
On 4/3/20 6:13 AM, miguel medalha wrote:
I have been using rsnapshot for years, with great success.
https://rsnapshot.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Since no one else has mentioned it
> Once upon a time, Valeri Galtsev said:
>> On 4/3/20 8:34 AM, John Pierce wrote:
>> >Do note, backup systems that use rsync or similar file by file copies
>> of a
>> >running system do not make coherent atomic snapshots, so things like
>> >relational databases should be excluded from those, and
Once upon a time, Valeri Galtsev said:
> On 4/3/20 8:34 AM, John Pierce wrote:
> >Do note, backup systems that use rsync or similar file by file copies of a
> >running system do not make coherent atomic snapshots, so things like
> >relational databases should be excluded from those, and backed by
On 4/3/20 8:34 AM, John Pierce wrote:
Do note, backup systems that use rsync or similar file by file copies of a
running system do not make coherent atomic snapshots, so things like
relational databases should be excluded from those, and backed by database
tools
Long ago I learned to back
Do note, backup systems that use rsync or similar file by file copies of a
running system do not make coherent atomic snapshots, so things like
relational databases should be excluded from those, and backed by database
tools
___
CentOS mailing list
I have been using rsnapshot for years, with great success.
https://rsnapshot.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Il 02/04/20 21:14, Karl Vogel ha scritto:
[Replying privately because my messages aren't making it to the list]
In a previous message, Alessandro Baggi said:
A> Bacula works without any problem, well tested, solid but complex to
A> configure. Tested on a single server (with volumes on disk)
Yes you are right. I meant that I don't need an real agent like with bacula
that need to be configured completely
Il Gio 2 Apr 2020, 19:52 Jonathan Billings ha scritto:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 05:32:35PM +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> > scripted rsync. Simple, through ssh protocol and
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 05:32:35PM +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> scripted rsync. Simple, through ssh protocol and private key. No agent
> required on target.
Just a point of clarification -- you need an rsync binary on both
sides of the ssh session, so 'rsync' would be the agent needed on the
Il 02/04/20 17:49, Nicolas Kovacs ha scritto:
Le 02/04/2020 à 17:32, Alessandro Baggi a écrit :
I have not so much experiences on backups and choosing the bad tool could be
dangerous so I need some suggestion.
What backup solution do you suggest for my scenario?
I'm using Rsnapshot on all my
Le 02/04/2020 à 17:32, Alessandro Baggi a écrit :
> I have not so much experiences on backups and choosing the bad tool could be
> dangerous so I need some suggestion.
>
> What backup solution do you suggest for my scenario?
I'm using Rsnapshot on all my CentOS 7 servers. It's a very elegant
Hi list,
I'm searching a valid backup system to perform backups of 3 server, one
local and 2 remote, and 2 linux workstation. (this number could be
higher in future). Currently I'm testing bacula, scripted rsync with
hardlink and borgbackup on C8.1.
Bacula works without any problem, well
13 matches
Mail list logo
