R P Herrold wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
... you do NOT file bugs in the bug tracker to
make formal
your concern.
I made last month about security updates missing for
almost
a month.
no bug - no issue.
Members of the CentOS community should, in a free
world be
able to ask
I'm not interested in your misguided vendetta. Can you please take this to
private mail? Thanks.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5)
and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt
and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind,
or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs?
If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could
be
Vandaman wrote:
There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5)
and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt
and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind,
or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs?
If more volunteers are needed I'm sure
If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could
be offered by the CentOS community.
you are either the world's best troll, or a complete moron.
--
Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd
021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz
signature.asc
Description: PGP
William Warren wrote:
how about you doing something to help instead of acting
like an
emperor..which by the way has no clothes and no throne.
I don't see why people have got their knickers in a twist
over a simple question. Was it not me who noticed updates
were missing for nearly a month?
Vandaman wrote:
I'm sure there are plenty of people who run CentOS in
production and going without security updates for a month
is not ideal. Many would offer to help were any offers
for help made.
Then I would suggest for those that they purchase RHEL with support.
CentOS is a free
R P Herrold wrote:
You hold no @centos.org, nor role beyond mailing list
participant. A non-enumerated list is worse than useless,
as
it falsely causes concern. So near as I can tell (and I
read
ALL bug filings, centdor-sec, and a daily custom locally
produced report of all upstream
On Mon, January 12, 2009 5:04 pm, Vandaman wrote:
snip
Members of the CentOS community should, in a free world be able
to ask valid questions aand offer to volunteer if that is needed.
Off course some don't live in the free world so its
unfortunate.
Regards,
Vandaman.
Vandaman,
From where
So I need a @centos.org address to ask the obvious do I? If so
I missed your response to the post I made last month about
security updates missing for almost a month.
No, but the obvious link that you're not making is that you're not
actually offering the help. You have blatantly said in
On Monday 12 January 2009 22:16:25 Marko A. Jennings
wrote:
On Mon, January 12, 2009 5:04 pm, Vandaman wrote:
snip
Members of the CentOS community should, in a free
world be able
to ask valid questions aand offer to volunteer if that
is needed.
Off course some don't live in the free
on 1-12-2009 2:27 PM Googlemail spake the following:
On Monday 12 January 2009 22:16:25 Marko A. Jennings
wrote:
On Mon, January 12, 2009 5:04 pm, Vandaman wrote:
snip
Members of the CentOS community should, in a free
world be able
to ask valid questions aand offer to volunteer if that
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
... you do NOT file bugs in the bug tracker to make formal
your concern.
I made last month about security updates missing for almost
a month.
no bug - no issue.
Members of the CentOS community should, in a free world be
able to
13 matches
Mail list logo
