Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

2008-11-19 Thread Tim Verhoeven
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Miguel Medalha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's a real raid adapter and the linux kernel is able to handle it with the standard ips module I found some references in Google that seemed to indicate a fakeraid controller, one that depends on the driver to do the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

2008-11-19 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Fabian Arrotin wrote: If you use the hw raid, you can easily manager your raid array with either ipssend cli or ServeRAID manager gui (both are downloadable from IBM support website) Faultdetection sucks with that, but you can use ipmitool for that: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ipmitool sdr|grep

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

2008-11-19 Thread Miguel Medalha
I've installed RHEL 4 on several IBM eSeries servers with ServeRaid controllers and I despise them. They fail too often and often don't tell you that they are having problems until it is too late. My suggestion is to use Linux software for your RAID array, and bypass the ServeRaid controller

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

2008-11-19 Thread Miguel Medalha
I've installed RHEL 4 on several IBM eSeries servers with ServeRaid controllers and I despise them. They fail too often and often don't tell you that they are having problems until it is too late. Are you referring to the SATA controllers or to the SCSI ones?

[CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

2008-11-18 Thread miguelmedalha
I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache with battery backup. I launched the CentOS boot DVD and CentOS correctly

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

2008-11-18 Thread Jim Wildman
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My question now is: what would be the better way to implement RAID 5 on this server? Should I use the detected array and respective driver or should I delete the array and go for Linus Software RAID? I don't know about throughput, but using

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

2008-11-18 Thread nate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know that Linux RAID will create a universal, more compatible array, readable on any Linux machine. But is there some other reason that makes it preferrable to use the SERVERAID driver provided by CentOS? Is it optimized in any way that recommends its use? I always

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

2008-11-18 Thread Chris Geldenhuis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache with battery backup. I launched the CentOS boot DVD and

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

2008-11-18 Thread Fabian Arrotin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache with battery backup. It's a real raid adapter and the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

2008-11-18 Thread Miguel Medalha
It's a real raid adapter and the linux kernel is able to handle it with the standard ips module I found some references in Google that seemed to indicate a fakeraid controller, one that depends on the driver to do the RAID calculations... It's always up to you to decide but i'd prefer

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

2008-11-18 Thread Ian Blackwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My question now is: what would be the better way to implement RAID 5 on this server? Should I use the detected array and respective driver or should I delete the array and go for Linus Software RAID? I've installed RHEL 4 on several IBM eSeries servers with ServeRaid