Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-06 Thread Mark Bradbury
> > Not much of a difference this time, still good for download in 4~5 > days. This time it looks more like adjusting based on known time > needed to push to external servers. > > Although I'm quite curious, how is the push done? Given the > requirements of 25Mbits for donated servers, it would tak

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-04 Thread Mike A. Harris
On 7/4/2011 9:08 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Best possible move right now will be releasing .torrent as soon as > possible. This will distribute load on large number of home users. So > you can wait for .torrent, download it and set an upload limit to those > 25Mbps. this will help immensely.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-04 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/04/2011 01:12 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Ouch, 25Mbps might had been a possible for me to contribute to the > project but 100Mbps is really hefty. I'll keep that in mind if we ever > get that much spare bandwidth to our private mirror and take it > public. what part of the world are yo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-04 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Ouch, 25Mbps might had been a possible for me to contribute to the > project but 100Mbps is really hefty. I'll keep that in mind if we ever > get that much spare bandwidth to our private mirror and take it > public. Once the "new version fewer" passes, current mirrors s

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-04 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 7/4/11, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 07/04/2011 06:28 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: >> oic, I've been using x64 exclusively to the point I overlooked the >> entire half of the x32 tree in my pondering. What is the minimum >> bandwidth required to host a mirror if not 25Mbps? > > ideally 100mbps+

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-04 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/04/2011 06:28 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > oic, I've been using x64 exclusively to the point I overlooked the > entire half of the x32 tree in my pondering. What is the minimum > bandwidth required to host a mirror if not 25Mbps? ideally 100mbps+ would be good, and a reasonable machine be

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-03 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 7/4/11, Karanbir Singh wrote: > not all links work at 25mbit/sec - that is really only local loop's - > most machines are 100mbps within the country but transit rates can vary. > Also, the tree size is 28G at this point - and will grow a bit more by > the time we release. oic, I've been using

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-03 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/03/2011 09:25 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Although I'm quite curious, how is the push done? Given the > requirements of 25Mbits for donated servers, it would take less than > an hour to push through even 10GB worth of DVD + CDs. It seems quite > odd that it takes 2~3 days just to push to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-03 Thread Andy Hull
On 11-07-03 07:04 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > > Anything else is just pure conjecture. > > > > > > > John > I do concede the point with regards to your logic, John. And I, of course, feel the same hesitation over the use of "weasel words".

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-03 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 7/3/11, Mark Bradbury wrote: >> > Of course, this time estimate is my guess and you should wait for >> > official estimate from someone from dev team. >> > >> Sorry my mistake. They will be available for download in 4-5 days, sync >> to external mirrors should be finished in 2 days. >> >> > Dat

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-03 Thread Mark Bradbury
> > Of course, this time estimate is my guess and you should wait for > > official estimate from someone from dev team. > > > Sorry my mistake. They will be available for download in 4-5 days, sync > to external mirrors should be finished in 2 days. > > Dates changed again http://qaweb.dev.centos.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-03 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Jeff Sheltren A: There's a good chance. Please continue to watch the >> QAweb site for updated information. > > Last word on the QA website is that final ISO's are in the making (or > they have already been made by now) and should be av

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-03 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Jeff Sheltren A: There's a good chance. Please continue to watch the > QAweb site for updated information. Last word on the QA website is that final ISO's are in the making (or they have already been made by now) and should be available for download on all official

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-01 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Tim Nelson wrote: > Greetings- > > Is there any updated news on the CentOS6 front? As per qaweb [1], today > should be the day of QA signoff and syncing to internal mirrors. Are things > still on track? > > --Tim > > [1] http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa Admin of the QA site replied to my questi

[CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

2011-07-01 Thread Tim Nelson
Greetings- Is there any updated news on the CentOS6 front? As per qaweb [1], today should be the day of QA signoff and syncing to internal mirrors. Are things still on track? --Tim [1] http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cen