The setup works well for different kernel. So it is not a problem with
the configuration ;)
Thanks for all help.
Best regards,
R.
2012/7/4 Gordon Messmer :
> On 06/25/2012 05:22 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
>> Do you see an error in my configuration? Why is 10.20.0.108 not available?
>
> I don't have
On 06/25/2012 05:22 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> Do you see an error in my configuration? Why is 10.20.0.108 not available?
I don't have a lot of managed switches around to do extensive testing.
The closest test I can do is on 5.8 with VLAN 2 and different IPs.
Based on that, everything seems like
Yes, it works well, no problems then.
Best regards,
Rafal,
2012/6/26 Gordon Messmer :
> On 06/26/2012 08:51 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> Are you absolutely sure that the switch port connected to eth0 is
>> configured to deliver tagged packets for VLAN 20 (and that the ping
>> source is also on th
On 06/26/2012 08:51 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Are you absolutely sure that the switch port connected to eth0 is
> configured to deliver tagged packets for VLAN 20 (and that the ping
> source is also on that VLAN)?
...and I should follow that up with:
If you create a tagged ethernet interface on
On 06/26/2012 12:02 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> Any clue?
Are you absolutely sure that the switch port connected to eth0 is
configured to deliver tagged packets for VLAN 20 (and that the ping
source is also on that VLAN)?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentO
tcpdump -n -i eth0 icmp and src host 10.20.0.98
does not give any results when ping is invoked.
2012/6/26 John R Pierce :
> On 06/26/12 12:47 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
>> tcpdump -n -i eth0.20
>> shows that there is no traffic when I try to ping 10.20.0.108.
>
> try just tcpdump -n -i eth0
>
> I a
On 06/26/12 12:47 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> tcpdump -n -i eth0.20
> shows that there is no traffic when I try to ping 10.20.0.108.
try just tcpdump -n -i eth0
I am not sure you can packet sniff a virtual interface, more likely you
can only sniff an actual physical interface.
--
john r pierc
tcpdump -n -i eth0.20
shows that there is no traffic when I try to ping 10.20.0.108.
Best regards,
R.
2012/6/26 Rafał Radecki :
> ip route show
> 192.168.2.0/24 dev vmbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.203
> 193.218.152.0/24 dev vmbr0 proto kernel scope link src 193.218.152.219
> 10.
ip route show
192.168.2.0/24 dev vmbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.203
193.218.152.0/24 dev vmbr0 proto kernel scope link src 193.218.152.219
10.20.0.0/16 dev vmbr20 proto kernel scope link src 10.20.0.108
169.254.0.0/16 dev vmbr0 scope link metric 1003
169.254.0.0/16 dev vmbr2
On 06/25/2012 05:22 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> Do you see an error in my configuration? Why is 10.20.0.108 not available?
Not immediately, but check the output of the 'ip' tools. ifconfig and
route are deprecated:
ip route show
ip addr show
Finally, see if there's any incoming traffic on the t
Rafał Radecki wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have currently an OpenVZ server:
>
> uname -a
> Linux vader8.superhost.pl 2.6.32-042stab055.16 #1 SMP Fri Jun 8
> 19:22:28 MSD 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 6.2 (Final)
I don't even remember that kernel for 6.2
Hi all.
I have currently an OpenVZ server:
uname -a
Linux vader8.superhost.pl 2.6.32-042stab055.16 #1 SMP Fri Jun 8
19:22:28 MSD 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 6.2 (Final)
lspci | grep -i eth
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd
12 matches
Mail list logo
