I also got the same segfault after upgrading to CentOS 6.5. The
VirtualBox gui segfaults before it appears, and I can not start the VMs
from the terminal either. Upgrading or downgrading to various VirtualBox
or kernel versions did not work either.
A workaround for me was to start the VMs using
On 12/06/2013 07:58 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> On 06/12/13 12:26, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:08:05AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/6/2013 12:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
KVM? I must admit I haven't even heard of it, except if you are talking
about switchboxes
On 06/12/13 12:26, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:08:05AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> On 12/6/2013 12:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>>> KVM? I must admit I haven't even heard of it, except if you are talking
>>> about switchboxes;-)
>>>
>>> Can it be configured to run an actual
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:08:05AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/6/2013 12:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> > KVM? I must admit I haven't even heard of it, except if you are talking
> > about switchboxes;-)
> >
> > Can it be configured to run an actual Windows partition? (This is how I
> > use Vi
On 06/12/2013 08:18, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 06/12/13 04:15, Anthony K wrote:
On 06/12/13 01:08, Toralf Lund wrote:
OK. So it's my system.
- Toralf
Not necessarily! I wouldn't worry too much about VirtualBox 4.3 - it is
terribly hosed; I suggest you downgrade back to 4.2.20 which,
Problem is
On 12/6/2013 12:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> KVM? I must admit I haven't even heard of it, except if you are talking
> about switchboxes;-)
>
> Can it be configured to run an actual Windows partition? (This is how I
> use VirtualBox today.)
"Kernel Virtualization Mode" or something. its a hypervis
On 05/12/13 19:08, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>> Is anyone here using VirtualBox? I've had it working rather well for
>> some time, but after some recent upgrade or the other it's started
>> exiting with a Segmentation fault just after startup, befo
On 05/12/13 18:50, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/5/2013 5:35 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>> Precisely! An the host being the CentOS 6.5 system. Perhaps I wasn't
>> clear enough about this, although it seemed obvious when I wrote the post.
>>
>> The guest OS really doesn't come into the picture at all, in
On 06/12/13 04:15, Anthony K wrote:
> On 06/12/13 01:08, Toralf Lund wrote:
>> OK. So it's my system.
>>
>> - Toralf
>>
> Not necessarily! I wouldn't worry too much about VirtualBox 4.3 - it is
> terribly hosed; I suggest you downgrade back to 4.2.20 which,
Problem is, I also tried a couple of dif
On 06/12/13 01:08, Toralf Lund wrote:
> OK. So it's my system.
>
> - Toralf
>
Not necessarily! I wouldn't worry too much about VirtualBox 4.3 - it is
terribly hosed; I suggest you downgrade back to 4.2.20 which, like
Giles, I've been using without any adverse effects for a while. I too
run a
On 12/5/2013 6:52 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> So cpu's without vmx are not as ancient as they might appear.
true, I always forget about the low end economy version processors as I
tend to buy within a couple notches of the top, rather than the bottom
of whatever generation, figuring that gets m
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:28:29 -0800
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/5/2013 12:30 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > AFAIK, KVM does not support host CPU's which don't have
> > virtualization support. If OP has somewhat aged hardware, he may
> > have no option but to use VirtualBox.
>
> that would be som
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:59:36PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Fred Smith
> wrote:
> > >
> > Not arguing with you, but... I recall hearing probably only a couple
> > years ago that not all the contemporary Intel processors exposed that
> > option, so you couldn't u
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Fred Smith
wrote:
> >
> Not arguing with you, but... I recall hearing probably only a couple
> years ago that not all the contemporary Intel processors exposed that
> option, so you couldn't use it on some processors. The writer of that
> blurb reported no obvious r
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 03:28:29PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/5/2013 12:30 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > AFAIK, KVM does not support host CPU's which don't have virtualization
> > support. If OP has somewhat aged hardware, he may have no option but to
> > use VirtualBox.
>
> that would b
On 12/5/2013 12:30 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> AFAIK, KVM does not support host CPU's which don't have virtualization
> support. If OP has somewhat aged hardware, he may have no option but to
> use VirtualBox.
that would be some old crufty hardware, like pentium-4 (or the
equivalent single core
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:50:41 -0800
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/5/2013 5:35 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> > Precisely! An the host being the CentOS 6.5 system. Perhaps I wasn't
> > clear enough about this, although it seemed obvious when I wrote
> > the post.
> >
> > The guest OS really doesn't come i
On 12/5/2013 10:14 AM, Wes James wrote:
> I was curious about "kvm" and asked google "kvm vs virutalbox" and found
> this:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel_haswell_virtualization&num=2
my experience is, disk IO is even more extreme, we do a lot of database
stuff (mostl
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> >
> > have you considered using KVM rather than VirtualBox for this?
> > Configured properly, its much higher performance.
>
> Benchmarks?
>
> FC
> ___
On 12/5/2013 10:05 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> >
>> >have you considered using KVM rather than VirtualBox for this?
>> >Configured properly, its much higher performance.
> Benchmarks?
I don't have any hard benchmarks, but KVM is performing
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>
> Is anyone here using VirtualBox? I've had it working rather well for
> some time, but after some recent upgrade or the other it's started
> exiting with a Segmentation fault just after startup, before windows are
> opened or anything. I've tri
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> have you considered using KVM rather than VirtualBox for this?
> Configured properly, its much higher performance.
Benchmarks?
FC
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
On 12/5/2013 5:35 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> Precisely! An the host being the CentOS 6.5 system. Perhaps I wasn't
> clear enough about this, although it seemed obvious when I wrote the post.
>
> The guest OS really doesn't come into the picture at all, in that
> VirtualBox seems to crash long before
On 05/12/13 15:01, Giles Coochey wrote:
>
> Toralf Lund writes:
>> Hi
>>
>> Is anyone here using VirtualBox? I've had it working rather well for
>> some time, but after some recent upgrade or the other it's started
>> exiting with a Segmentation fault just after startup, bef
Toralf Lund writes:
Hi
Is anyone here using VirtualBox? I've had it working rather well for
some time, but after some recent upgrade or the other it's started
exiting with a Segmentation fault just after startup, before
windows are
opened or anything. I've tried a few different versions, all w
On 04/12/13 14:18, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 04/12/2013 13:16, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> On 04/12/2013 12:39, Lars Hecking wrote:
>>> Toralf Lund writes:
Hi
Is anyone here using VirtualBox? I've had it working rather well for
some time, but after some recent upgrade or the other i
On 04/12/13 18:12, Rainer Traut wrote:
> Am 04.12.2013 13:39, schrieb Lars Hecking:
>> Toralf Lund writes:
>>> So, have any of you lot seen this? Is there a way to make things work?
>>
>> http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.5#head-eb6bb9abad0158d054915e0090560f6d1ff8f1ed
> I gue
Am 04.12.2013 18:12, schrieb Rainer Traut:
> Am 04.12.2013 13:39, schrieb Lars Hecking:
>> Toralf Lund writes:
>
>>> So, have any of you lot seen this? Is there a way to make things work?
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.5#head-eb6bb9abad0158d054915e0090560f6d1ff8f1e
Am 04.12.2013 13:39, schrieb Lars Hecking:
> Toralf Lund writes:
>> So, have any of you lot seen this? Is there a way to make things work?
>
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.5#head-eb6bb9abad0158d054915e0090560f6d1ff8f1ed
I guess the threadstarter meant VB on the host.
On 04/12/2013 13:16, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 04/12/2013 12:39, Lars Hecking wrote:
Toralf Lund writes:
Hi
Is anyone here using VirtualBox? I've had it working rather well for
some time, but after some recent upgrade or the other it's started
exiting with a Segmentation fault just after startup
On 04/12/2013 12:39, Lars Hecking wrote:
Toralf Lund writes:
Hi
Is anyone here using VirtualBox? I've had it working rather well for
some time, but after some recent upgrade or the other it's started
exiting with a Segmentation fault just after startup, before windows are
opened or anything. I'
Toralf Lund writes:
> Hi
>
> Is anyone here using VirtualBox? I've had it working rather well for
> some time, but after some recent upgrade or the other it's started
> exiting with a Segmentation fault just after startup, before windows are
> opened or anything. I've tried a few different vers
Hi
Is anyone here using VirtualBox? I've had it working rather well for
some time, but after some recent upgrade or the other it's started
exiting with a Segmentation fault just after startup, before windows are
opened or anything. I've tried a few different versions, all with the
same result.
33 matches
Mail list logo
