On 06/18/2015 08:26 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 07:51:28AM +0530, Sudhi wrote:
>> Thanks for the replies.
>> I understood that a major part of testing being done by Redhat. But after
>> repackaging the sources how doest CentOS make sure
>> the integrity of the product. Is
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 07:51:28AM +0530, Sudhi wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
> I understood that a major part of testing being done by Redhat. But after
> repackaging the sources how doest CentOS make sure
> the integrity of the product. Is it being done by a dedicated team or by
> community ?
Thanks for the replies.
I understood that a major part of testing being done by Redhat. But after
repackaging the sources how doest CentOS make sure
the integrity of the product. Is it being done by a dedicated team or by
community ?
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Jonathan Billings
wrote:
> O
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:49:42AM +0530, Sudhi wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the forum to ask this query. I was wondering how
> the CentOS making sure that it work with different architectures, machine
> models etc. Is there any team to do all these testing ?
This isn't for CentOS, but for RHE
On 06/11/2015 11:19 PM, Sudhi wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> I'm not sure if this is the forum to ask this query. I was wondering
> how the CentOS making sure that it work with different architectures,
> machine models etc. Is there any team to do all these testing ?
yes.
not sure if you are fishi
Hello everyone
I'm not sure if this is the forum to ask this query. I was wondering how
the CentOS making sure that it work with different architectures, machine
models etc. Is there any team to do all these testing ?
Thanks
Sudeesh John
___
CentOS mail
On 05/27/2012 12:15 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Hi subscribers,
>
> the sponsor of the machine our mailserver runs on will be physically
> moving the machine at around May 27th 04:00 UTC. This move will take
> until around May 27th 07:00 UTC (or shorter).
And we are back
--
Karanbir Singh
+44
On 05/13/2011 10:52 AM, Steven Crothers wrote:
> Does anybody know why this list is private and password protected? It
> would be nice to see progress, but it appears that part of the
> development is completely locked down and not open source.
>
We have made the QA tracker open for viewing here:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> Does anybody know why this list is private and password protected? It
> would be nice to see progress, but it appears that part of the
> development is completely locked down and not open source.
For (x = 0; x < REALLY_LARGE_NUMBER; x++)
{
system("echo \"IS IT DO
Does anybody know why this list is private and password protected? It
would be nice to see progress, but it appears that part of the
development is completely locked down and not open source.
--
Steven Crothers
steven.croth...@gmail.com
___
CentOS maili
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Patrice Guay wrote:
> I updated the livecd-tools package from version 013 to 014. This update
> introduces new interesting features like :
> - support for Xen kernel
> - built-in md5sum into the resulting LiveCD ISO
> - a new API
>
> See https://projects.centos.org/trac/livecd
11 matches
Mail list logo
