Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> By the way, has this been accepted in the mainline kernel? > The patches are in 2.6.38.2 just downloaded from kernel.org. Indeed. Just found it here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/st

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :) Akemi HOORAY - it works. I got an ipv6 address: $ ip6 a s eth2 4: eth2: mtu 1500 qle

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :) > > Akemi > > HOORAY - it works. > > I got an ipv6 address: > $ ip6 a s eth2 > 4: eth2: mtu 1500 qlen 1000 >     inet6 2001:db8

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011 11:36 files let me try the kernel-2.6.32-71.24.1.

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the > > kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011 > 11:36 > > files let me try the > > kernel-2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1.i686.rpm

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 01:08 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in 0004586 (thanks). I am pleased to report th

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > > On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in > 0004586 (thanks). I am pleased  to report > that they appear to work as adverti

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. I

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. I got a kernel built with the patches using t

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they > will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. > I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in > 0004586

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/08/2011 11:35 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing. Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they will be a worthy addition to t

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing. > > Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they > will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. > I got a kernel

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: I had a quick look at the patches. The first one seems to be applicable without any modifications. The second one will need an adjustment. Akemi I just finish

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:56:24 +0200 Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Rob Kampen wrote: > > Tom Bishop wrote: > >> This is excellent information Akemi, provides opportunities for > >> folks to dig in and specific information that is needed and where > >> to go to learn more...Thanks! :) > >> > >> On Th

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > I had a quick look at the patches. The first one seems to be > applicable without any modifications. The second one will need an > adjustment. > Akemi > > I just finished building a kernel based on

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

Rob Kampen wrote: > Tom Bishop wrote: >> This is excellent information Akemi, provides opportunities for folks >> to dig in and specific information that is needed and where to go to >> learn more...Thanks! :) >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Akemi Yagi > > wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 12:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4586 Point 2 (note 12051) is the one that is relevant. I welcome any feedback / suggestions for the proposed method I outli

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

Tom Bishop wrote: This is excellent information Akemi, provides opportunities for folks to dig in and specific information that is needed and where to go to learn more...Thanks! :) On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Akemi Yagi > wrote: Changing the subject line for

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/07/2011 12:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4586 > > Point 2 (note 12051) is the one that is relevant. I welcome any > feedback / suggestions for the proposed method I outlined there. > While you are there, l

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/07/2011 12:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Changing the subject line for good ... On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:23:51 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote: AIUI: In previous releases, RH distributed source + patches. Starting 6.0 RH releases patched so

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

This is excellent information Akemi, provides opportunities for folks to dig in and specific information that is needed and where to go to learn more...Thanks! :) On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > Changing the subject line for good ... > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Lamar

[CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

Changing the subject line for good ... On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:23:51 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> AIUI: In previous releases, RH distributed source + patches.  Starting >> 6.0 RH releases patched source.  This makes backing out a patch,