Michael Rock wrote:
To be specific it listed it as "RedHat 5.0 Client".
http://www.linuxtested.com/results/asus_p5k-vm.html
They did not test sata though
Hard Drive Seagate ST320410A 20G (IDE)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
te:
> From: Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and 2.6.18-92 Kernel backported SATA fixes?
> To: centos@centos.org
> Date: Monday, July 7, 2008, 10:31 AM
> Michael Rock wrote on Mon, 7 Jul 2008 05:35:38 -0700 (PDT):
>
> > it showed
>
Michael Rock wrote on Mon, 7 Jul 2008 05:35:38 -0700 (PDT):
> it showed
> this model tested ok with Redhat
"Redhat" is not a distribution, what exactly got it tested with?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
_
--- On Mon, 7/7/08, Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and 2.6.18-92 Kernel backported SATA fixes?
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Date: Monday, July 7, 2008, 7:01 AM
> On Sun, 6 Jul
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008, Michael Rock wrote:
Last year to get motherboards with the G33 chipset with SATA working
with Centos I had to either use David Harbic fixes or use Fedora 8 since
it had the later 2.6.25 kernel.
I no longer see David's fixes available and also see in the 5.2 release
notes
Last year to get motherboards with the G33 chipset with SATA working with
Centos I had to either use David Harbic fixes or use Fedora 8 since it had the
later 2.6.25 kernel.
I no longer see David's fixes available and also see in the 5.2 release notes
"update SATA driver and infrastructure". D
6 matches
Mail list logo
