And both repos are synced and correct version, base and updates? I would
check their content (including repodata.xml etc.) against the CentOS
mirrors for 5.
I would expect an error like this when the repodata.xml contains the file,
but it isn't on the repo (which could happen if one excludes fil
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:49:47 -0400:
I should also mention that right now, I have a fresh install foranother
system running off this repo.
Then, as Toby says, there might be something wrong with your local
yum/repo config. If I recall right yo
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 11:14 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
Just some guesses here . . .
Maybe something's buggered in /etc/yum.repos.d. Try comparing the broken
with the working. If the broken still looks right, try making a backup
of the broken & copy in the
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:49:47 -0400:
> I should also mention that right now, I have a fresh install foranother
> system running off this repo.
Then, as Toby says, there might be something wrong with your local
yum/repo config. If I recall right you have a few (5.1, 5.2) rep
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 11:14 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
>
> Just some guesses here . . .
>
> Maybe something's buggered in /etc/yum.repos.d. Try comparing the broken
> with the working. If the broken still looks right, try making a backup
> of the broken & copy in the working - there may be some
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:46:12 -0400:
[Errno 4] IOError:
Searching the local folder of this list reveals two older postings
from you about this (one from December, one a few days ago). It
seems to ind
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:46:12 -0400:
[Errno 4] IOError:
Searching the local folder of this list reveals two older postings
from you about this (one from December, one a few days ago). It seems
to indicate that your repo is n
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:46:12 -0400:
[Errno 4] IOError:
Searching the local folder of this list reveals two older postings from
you about this (one from December, one a few days ago). It seems to
indicate that your repo is not completely in
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:46:12 -0400:
> [Errno 4] IOError:
Searching the local folder of this list reveals two older postings from
you about this (one from December, one a few days ago). It seems to
indicate that your repo is not completely in sync. Either a new sync or
cl
My first notebook upgrade:
I repaired my old HP nc4010 (bought a new hinge on ebay) and realized
this was the perfect way to test out the upgrade to 5.2 before doing it
on my production notebook.
First I updated to 'current' 5.1 (by current I mean I have not synced my
5.1 local repo since bu
10 matches
Mail list logo
