Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

> > Is there anything else relevant to add? > ___ Yeah, please can someone fix the front-page to better reflect the distribution for what it is, rather than the sales pitch that is there now. Not everyone has read about it ad nausem on this list.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 05:51:46 PM Ian Murray wrote: > > Is there anything else relevant to add? > Yeah, please can someone fix the front-page to better reflect the > distribution > for what it is, rather than the sales pitch that is there now. Not everyone > has > read about it ad nau

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

- Original Message > From: Lamar Owen > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Wed, 20 April, 2011 21:32:35 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update? > > On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 03:29:07 PM Ian Murray wrote: > > My big beef has always been that the website

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 04/20/11 2:51 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > >> Is there anything else relevant to add? >> ___ > Yeah, please can someone fix the front-page to better reflect the distribution > for what it is, rather than the sales pitch that is there now. Not everyone > h

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

> But to allude to > him as a respected industry member is greatly stretching things when > every article that mentions CentOS is disparaging and I can't recall any > article even ending on a positive note. Try google: http://lwn.net/Articles/123934/ (For the record, I couldn't find any p

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

- Original Message > From: John R Pierce > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: Wed, 20 April, 2011 23:04:50 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update? > > On 04/20/11 2:51 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > > > >> Is ther

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:31:04PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > Seriously, just skip over my posts. I am not forcing you to read them. I'll > finish when I am good and ready... not when *you* decide. How about I write you a check to just go away?

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

(someone) wrote: > Why does the website say something so different, then? Seriously? Are people really this retarded? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > Seriously, just skip over my posts. I am not forcing you to read them. I'll > finish when I am good and ready... not when *you* decide. I'm trying to figure out why someone who, apparently, hates the CentOS distribution so much, spends so much

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Brian Mathis > It doesn't matter if you provide something "for free", because it's > not free.  Everyone who uses CentOS invests significant time and > energy into it. How so? By installing it? -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > My big beef has always been that the website and project name suggest one > thing > (i.e. enterprise ready), when the reality is quiet different. I think Zonker > got > that one spot on. My suggest to the devs is to change the name and update

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:18:21AM -0400, Brian Mathis wrote: > > No. News reporting is about picking up and distilling the sentiment > of what's going on. The article has done that. It doesn't have to be > a complete factual research project with totally "fair and balanced" > chances for every

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:29:07PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never give > me > sufficient information to start a competing rebuild. Information needed to rebuild is, and has been for quite some time, in the ar

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:25:06PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > Try google: http://lwn.net/Articles/123934/ I've read the articles; I've no need to re-read them. > (For the record, I couldn't find any previous disparaging comments from > him... I > stopped at page 6) You didn't look very hard

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:01:22PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:31:04PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > > > Seriously, just skip over my posts. I am not forcing you to read them. I'll > > finish when I am good and ready... not when *you* decide. > > How about I write

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 4/21/11, John R. Dennison wrote: > The only sentiment picked up on was that of a loud, minuscule and > irrelevant fraction of the user base from this and the -devel mailing > lists. He went with the loudest group of whiners he could find. Perhaps only a small handful keep "whining" about the

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 04/20/2011 09:18 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Ian Murray wrote: >> Okay, maybe that was an assumption too far in regards to "respect". >> >> Perhaps not so one-sided if he had received an email reply from the devs >> assuming he did indeed send one to KB. To be

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 04/20/2011 02:29 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > > I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never give > me > sufficient information to start a competing rebuild. Why would anyone give another entity all the things required to replace them? Red Hat does not give us nearly

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:19:12PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Perhaps only a small handful keep "whining" about the situation. > However, the same idea that 95% of CentOS users never post to the ML > is also applicable to the complainer population. For every complainer, > there are probably

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Perhaps only a small handful keep "whining" about the situation. > However, the same idea that 95% of CentOS users never post to the ML > is also applicable to the complainer population. For every complainer, > there are probably 9 oth

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 04/20/2011 11:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 04/20/2011 02:29 PM, Ian Murray wrote: >> >> I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never >> give me >> sufficient information to start a competing rebuild. > > Why would anyone give another entity all the things requi

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

> This begs the question: > > Why are you still here? No, really. Why? You've nothing good to say. > Ever. Do you honestly think that the continue crap spewing off your > fingers endears you to the CentOS team? Do you think they care? Do you > think you're important to them? Let me disabuse

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 4/20/11 8:53 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > > The only sentiment picked up on was that of a loud, minuscule and > irrelevant fraction of the user base from this and the -devel mailing > lists. He went with the loudest group of whiners he could find. If he had wanted to be really critical he wou

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 4/20/11 11:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never >> give me >> sufficient information to start a competing rebuild. > > Why would anyone give another entity all the things required to replace > them? Why? Because nearly all t

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 23:25 +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > > But to allude to > > him as a respected industry member is greatly stretching things when > > every article that mentions CentOS is disparaging and I can't recall any > > article even ending on a positive note. > > Try google: http:

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/20/11 11:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never >>> give me >>> sufficient information to start a competing rebuild. >> >> Why would anyone give another entity all the

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Craig White wrote: > I think that the apologist point of view for is pretty much worthless > because the intent is to stifle those who are genuinely concerned about > the timeliness now. Yeah, "genuinely concerned." And that "concern" is supposedly best served b

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

- Original Message > From: John R. Dennison > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Thu, 21 April, 2011 1:01:22 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update? > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:31:04PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > > > Seriously, just skip over my

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

- Original Message > From: Garry Dale > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Thu, 21 April, 2011 1:37:33 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update? > > (someone) wrote: > > Why does the website say something so different, then? > > Seriously? Ar

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

- Original Message > From: Ron Blizzard > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Thu, 21 April, 2011 1:59:19 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update? > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > > > Seriously, just skip over my posts. I am no

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

> It sounds to me like "your big beef" is that you can't run the CentOS > distribution the way *you* want it run. Whether you agree or not, > doesn't change the fact that CentOS *is* enterprise ready.-- and many > enterprises use it. The only time there are significant delays in No, I would

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

- Original Message > From: John R. Dennison > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Thu, 21 April, 2011 2:58:36 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update? > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:29:07PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > > > I have it black and white in a

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

> > And do us a favor? Take your own advice. > I always try to state "as far as I know", "as far as I can tell", "in my opinion/belief". Can we recall that I commented on the fact that a major Linux magazine had put up a pretty damning article. I don't know why I am getting attacked for

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 01:27:23PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > No, I would just like the name and website to match the facts. I would > suggest > that anybody that calls centOS "enterprise-ready" might have a different > concept > to what an enterprise is to me. Enterprise to me is at least a 1

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

Its pretty funny how flaming any thread with Centos 6 in it can get. So the devs do/do not communicate, who cares. When Centos 6 does come out, many will say "O big daddy, thank you sooo much, I love you... " or something like that. And the old adage about "No one ever got fired for buying IBM

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

And think about how the Plutonians feel after there home was bumped down from planet to moon, or was cold worthless chunk rotating the Sun. - aurf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > And think about how the Plutonians feel after there home was bumped > down from planet to moon, or was cold worthless chunk rotating the Sun. > Equal rights for Pluto! mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Apr 21, 2011, at 10:22 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: >> And think about how the Plutonians feel after there home was bumped >> down from planet to moon, or was cold worthless chunk rotating the >> Sun. >> > Equal rights for Pluto! Sheee ku, thats what I be sayin.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:19 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 01:34:54PM -0400, Tom H wrote: >> >> If CentOS had a communication policy, it could spare itself these >> types of articles... > > No.  These types of articles will continue to appear whether there is a > communicat

[CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the information given on this site: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-

[CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 6/14/2011 12:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: PLEASE ... let this thread die or take it to a bar somewhere ... it has NOTHING do do with the subject line -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS

[CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Gordon Messmer wrote: > Nothing that Red Hat did has increased the burden on CentOS. so says the person who has not done it - the rpm tool changed, adding a non-backward compatible compression scheme. as I blogged about months ago; this has 'flow through' effects as to boo

[CentOS] CentOS 6 supported hardware

Has anyone seen a supported hardware list on CentOS 6? I've been looking around for the last few days; even looked at RedHat's site but didn't find one. I've got a Dell Inspiron 1501 with a Dell Wireless 1390 WLAN mini-card in it and I'm trying to find out if it's going to have native driver s

[CentOS] centos 6 (what else? :) :)

Hi all! My thanks to the Centos team for continuing to slave away on C6 even with all the distractions!!! Just did a test install on my eeepc 901 (on an external drive, til I'm comfortable with it) and find that it doesn't seem to know how to talk to the ralink 2860 wireless chipset. A few month

[CentOS] CentOS 6 CDs isos...

Hey, just wondering if CentOS 6 CDs isos are also planned, or if there will be only the DVDs ones...? Thx, JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS 6 and pxeboot

Well, I started the install, got pxeboot to get to the kickstart file, formatted the drive... and then it failed, telling me "unable to read group information from repositories. This is a problem with the generation of your install tree." A quick google gives me the first hit from a year ago, bug

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

Timothy Murphy wrote: > I've installed CentOS-6 on my server > (in parallel to CentOS-5.6) > and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd. > > I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd > under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message > "Not configured to listen on any interfaces!" > when I "sudo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

On 07/15/2011 05:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > I've installed CentOS-6 on my server > (in parallel to CentOS-5.6) > and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd. > > I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd > under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message > "Not configured to listen on any

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

Jake Shipton wrote: > On 07/15/2011 05:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> I've installed CentOS-6 on my server >> (in parallel to CentOS-5.6) >> and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd. >> >> I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd >> under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message >> "Not con

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > as a rule, you should declare ALL subnets in simple form: > > subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { } > > so ISC DHCP knows about them. Why, I do not know, but it is supposed to > be in newer versions (more strict rules for config file.) Thanks for your respons

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only > set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface. What exactly do you mean when you say that "you can only set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface"? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

On 07/15/2011 02:06 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Jake Shipton wrote: On 07/15/2011 05:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I've installed CentOS-6 on my server (in parallel to CentOS-5.6) and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd. I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd under CentOS-6, but I'm get

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

On 7/15/2011 1:54 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> as a rule, you should declare ALL subnets in simple form: >> >> subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { } >> >> so ISC DHCP knows about them. Why, I do not know, but it is supposed to >> be in newer versions (more stri

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

Timothy Murphy wrote: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only >> set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface. > > What exactly do you mean when you say that "you can only set DHCP service > on the first IP on the interfac

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

On 7/15/2011 2:56 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> >>> and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only >>>set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface. >> >> What exactly do you mean when you say that "you can

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

Les Mikesell wrote: > On 7/15/2011 2:56 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Timothy Murphy wrote: >>> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>> and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface. >>> What exactly do you mean wh

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

On 7/15/2011 3:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only > set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface. What exactly do you mean when you say that "you can only set DHCP service on the first IP on the i

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

Les Mikesell wrote: >> But what puzzles me is, what defines the correspondence >> between interface and network, >> eg in my case eth1 -> 192.168.2.0/24 >> >> Surely this should be there independently of dhcpd ? > > Dhcpd shouldn't care about the name of the interface, but if the request > hasn't

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

Steve Clark wrote: > You have to have a subnet declaration(s) that matches an existing > subnet(s) that is configured on the interface(s) you want to provide > dynamic addresses for. But how exactly is a subnet, in my case 192.168.2.0, "configured" on the interface eth1 ? -- Timothy Murphy e

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

On Jul 15, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > >>> But what puzzles me is, what defines the correspondence >>> between interface and network, >>> eg in my case eth1 -> 192.168.2.0/24 >>> >>> Surely this should be there independently of dhcpd ? >> >> Dhcpd shouldn't

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 dhcpd

Timothy Murphy writes: > > > I've installed CentOS-6 on my server > (in parallel to CentOS-5.6) > and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd. > > I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd > under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message > "Not configured to listen on any interfaces!" > whe

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On 07/25/2011 06:30 PM, John Hinton wrote: > I see that SquirrelMail is gone from 6. Is there a package in here > somewhere that is a webmail system? Otherwise, I suppose it lives in one > of the repos like sourceforge. I just wanted to check if something new > existed before doing that. > Upstrea

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

It's not in any centos-related repos, but I'd highly recommend horde: (IMP is the subsystem that is the webmail portion.) Devin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Devin Reade wrote: > To: CentOS mailing list > From: Devin Reade > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail > > It's not in any centos-related repos, but I'd highly recommend > horde: <http://www.horde.org/> (IMP is the subsystem that is

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote: > > +1 that's what my hosting provider gives on my webmail > service, and I think it's a nice application to use. Please excuse the untimely response - been busy. I'd give users Exchange and OWA before I would even consider Horde an

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

John R. Dennison wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote: >> >> +1 that's what my hosting provider gives on my webmail >> service, and I think it's a nice application to use. > > Please excuse the untimely response - been busy. > > I'd give users Exchange and OWA befo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > John R. Dennison wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote: > >> > >> +1 that's what my hosting provider gives on my webmail > >> service, and I think it's a nice application to use. > > > > Please e

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On this list, we are not supposed to talk about politics, religion, guns and helmet laws... Oops That's my motorcycling lists! ;) I guess the first three pertain to 'all' list except for those devoted to one or more of those three topics. Although, it can be really hard to refrain sometimes

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:28 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > As Americans we must always remember that we all have a common enemy, an > > enemy that is dangerous, powerful and relentless. I refer, of course, to > > the federal government. > > > > -- Dave Barry (3 July 1947-), Pulitzer Prize-wi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:50:00PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > Excess noise removed. It was a .signature quote. It's not fodder for this list. If you've a point to make or a comment to make about what I include in my .signature database then take it up with me _off-list_; otherwise please e

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:50:00PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:28 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > > As Americans we must always remember that we all have a common enemy, an > > > enemy that is dangerous, powerful and relentless. I refer, of course, to > > > t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

> I'd give users Exchange and OWA before I would even consider Horde and its ilk Well, we want free software, if I wanted to pay for a good webmail server I'd go for Axigen, as my experience, excellent option running on CentOS. J. ___ CentOS mailing li

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 13:33 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote: > > > > +1 that's what my hosting provider gives on my webmail > > service, and I think it's a nice application to use. > > Please excuse the untimely response - been busy.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Craig White wrote: > Not going to comment on Exchange/OWA It's really hard for me not to. Exchange is a god awful pile of crap that doesn't properly implement IMAP (true of 2003-2007, not tried 2010), and MS don't really care that much about it, as you should be using MAPI.

[CentOS] CentOS 6 driver support

Hello all, This is the laptop I own: HP Pavilion dv6t Quad Edition Spec: Intel Core i7-2630QM 2.0GHz, 6GB RAM, 750GB HDD, VGA ATI Radeon HD 6490M You can also check the spec here: http://www.amazon.com/HP-Pavilion-dv6t-dv6tqe-Laptop/dp/B00506B7DS/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1312164145

[CentOS] CentOS 6, Postfix Dovecot

I only have one Postfix server running at the moment and have some questions. On that install, I did Amavisd-new with ClamAV, SpamAssassin, Postfix and Dovecot. I know this is a bit off topic, but I'm really hoping for performance guidance. Is the added layer of complexity running Amavis worth

[CentOS] centos 6 and XFS

What do I need to enable XFS support in CentOS 6? is there a "CentOS Plus" kernel yet that enables this ? -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@ce

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 updates?

> I haven't seen -any- updates to centos 6 since July 10th?!?    is 6.1 > holding this up? >From the devel mailing list: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-August/008071.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 updates?

On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 11:07 +0200, Mathieu Baudier wrote: > > I haven't seen -any- updates to centos 6 since July 10th?!?is 6.1 > > holding this up? > > >From the devel mailing list: > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-August/008071.html Time for upgrading 5.6. I wonder h

[CentOS] CentOS 6: bootup display

On my old CentOS 5, when it boots up (to level 3) it displays a line for each of the things it is starting as it does it. I found that quite useful. On my new CentOS 6, while it is booting up, it displays a useless CentOS trademark picture. Is there a way to get the old kind of display in CentOS

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 packages

On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:30 -0600, CS DBA wrote: > Hi all; > > does anyone know if the following packages are available (via yum) for > CentOS 6 and if so which repo they come from? > > Thanks in advance... > > > kmymoney > darktable > digiKam > You might try #yum --enablerepo= search kmymone

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 packages

On 8/31/2011 3:30 PM, CS DBA wrote: > Hi all; > > does anyone know if the following packages are available (via yum) for > CentOS 6 and if so which repo they come from? > > Thanks in advance... > > > kmymoney > darktable > digiKam > You could try the search page at: http://pkgs.org/search/ I di

[CentOS] CentOS 6 Partitioning Help

*Re-sending as it appears my original e-mail did not go through*. Good Evening All, I have a question regarding CentOS 6 server partitioning. Now I know there are a lot of different ways to partition the system and different opinions depending on the use of the server. I currently have a quad

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 packages

digiKam is found, I had epel, rpm forge, and base CentOS repos... others not by default, maybe if you search http://rpm.pbone.net/ On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:30 PM, CS DBA wrote: > Hi all; > > does anyone know if the following packages are available (via yum) for > CentOS 6 and if so which repo t

[CentOS] CentOS 6 + XEN problem

Hi, Does anyone know what version of XEN works fine with CentOS 6? I installed XEN on a CentOS 6 server, as per these instructions: http://www.crc.id.au/xen-on-rhel6-scientific-linux-6-centos-6-howto/ And the server now gives this error on reboot: PANIC: early exception 0e rip 10:0 error 10 c

[CentOS] CentOS 6 + XEN problem

On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Does anyone know what version of XEN works fine with CentOS 6? > > I installed XEN on a CentOS 6 server, as per these instructions: > http://www.crc.id.au/xen-on-rhel6-scientific-linux-6-centos-6-howto/ and this issue about a third party writeup is not ask

[CentOS] CentOS 6 + XEN problem

On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Digimer wrote: > That was hardly called for. If you find a post off topic or > uninteresting, just delete it. Either no one will reply or, if there is > interest in the question, others will and the question will be decided > to have value. wrong Seemingly you feel it is prop

[CentOS] CentOS 6 + XEN problem

On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:02 PM, R - elists wrote: >> - rh > Russ why don't you just discipline everyone? Cause no-one can stick to > CentOS-only conversations in your righteous eyes. Rudi, I know it is confusing to you , as Robert Heller and Russ Herr

[CentOS] CentOS 6: snort, fwlogwatch

Hallo, in CentOS 5 fwlogwatch is available. CentOS 6: I have found nothing. Snort: installation from source? Other idea? Alternative software? OSSEC? Thank you for help in advance Best regards Helmut ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.

[CentOS] CentOS-6 by PXEboot?

Has anyone succeeded in installing CentOS-6.0 by PXEboot. If so, would you say how you did it, please. I tried (on an HP MicroServer), but gave up in the end and used a USB stick installation instead. But I'd be very interested to know how to do it, for the future. Unfortunately I didn't keep a p

[CentOS] centos 6 console screen

How do I get the centos 6 console screen out of high-res mode? I tried a couple things of adding to the grub.conf file vga=ask and vga=769. Neither had any effect. I did not get prompted to ask for what mode or anything Whats the correct way to have centos 6 drop into normal old vga text

[CentOS] CentOS 6 USB changes

Ok, I just managed, after much effort, to rebuild my USB key to install CentOS 6. There are a number of changes. Partition the USB key, but make partition 1, Win 95 (FAT32) (I think that's partition type "b"), bigger. I made it 500M. The rest should be ext3 (or whatever). Format the partitions. M

[CentOS] CentOS 6 and Pyzor

Had anybody been successful in getting Pyzor to run on CentOS 6 64bit? I have it running fine on CentOS 6 32 bit, and I 'think' I did identical installs. But, from the command line I keep getting Oct 6 13:36:00.659 [16065] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor Oct 6 13:36:06.205 [1606

[CentOS] CentOS 6 updating policy

I am migrating from debian to RHEL (CentOS) and I am wondering how the CentOS 6 updating system works. Suppose I install CentOS 6.1 now. Suppose in 8 months CentOS 6.2 is released. Now I issue a yum update, so my system will be updated to CentOS 6.2, or I will have an updated 6.1 ? What if I

[CentOS] CentOS 6: php-eaccelerator

has anybody ever got eaccelerator working with open_basedir on CentOS? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751569 i wonder that the last build is more than a yaer ago and nobody hitted until now or nobody is secring his vhsost and so did not take notice about it http://koji.fedoraproject.o

[CentOS] CentOS 6 smb authentication?

I have some services on Centos5 boxes that use smb authentication against the Windows domain as a low-maintenance way to handle most of our office users for things that don't need home directories (web/file shares, etc.). Running authconfig is all it takes to add it to PAM, then adding mod_auth_pa

[CentOS] CentOS 6, yum-updatesd

Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6, the preferred tool for updates was the "new" yum-updatesd. Anyone know: a) what theological reason upstream had to drop it altogether, and b) what's the recommended replacement - is it yum-cron? I hand-update some servers, and o

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 docs?

Hi Mark, probably you know it, but maybe someone else finds this useful: On 07.11.2012, at 19:56, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Is there somewhere else than for > documentation for CentOS 6? Since

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 docs?

On 7.11.2012 19:56, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Is there somewhere else than for > documentation for CentOS 6? I think because CentOS is a clone of Upstream it would be a waste of resources to duplicate the documentation effort. In other words: read upstreams documenta

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 docs?

Hi, Peter, Peter Eckel wrote: > > probably you know it, but maybe someone else finds this useful: > > On 07.11.2012, at 19:56, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Is there somewhere else than for >> documentation for CentOS 6? > >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >