hello Dario,
have a look at : https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/
this works very well.
greetings, J.
Op 09-11-12 15:18, Dario Lesca schreef:
Hi, there is a how-to useful to install and configure LTSP on a Centos
6.3 server, in order to boot a C6 or Fedora Client diskless ?
Many thanks
Am 06.11.2012 15:41, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Behalf
Of Rainer Traut
Thx for all your answers, but latest Bios is installed (A07 from year
2006). The pc is has not crashed so far, except the poweroff thingy so
I guess
hw is ok. FWIW under C5 all was well.
A wild shot;
Am 06.11.2012 17:16, schrieb Leon Fauster:
Am 06.11.2012 um 13:52 schrieb Rainer Traut:
Am 05.11.2012 19:28, schrieb James A. Peltier:
Update the BIOS. Should fix it. We had this issue a while back and the
new BIOS corrected the issue.
Thx for all your answers, but latest Bios is
Am 06.11.2012 13:57, schrieb Sorin Srbu:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Rainer Traut
Sent: den 6 november 2012 13:53
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: Dell GX270 fails to power down (but reboots
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Rainer Traut
Sent: den 8 november 2012 10:42
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: Dell GX270 fails to power down (but reboots)
I looked at the capacitors, they seem good
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Sorin Srbu wrote:
To: 'CentOS mailing list' centos@centos.org
From: Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: Dell GX270 fails to power down (but reboots)
Have you tried to shutdown from a CL console.
$ pinfo shutdown:
SHUTDOWN(8
Keith Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Sorin Srbu wrote:
To: 'CentOS mailing list' centos@centos.org
From: Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: Dell GX270 fails to power down (but
reboots)
Have you tried to shutdown from a CL console.
snip
I thought the OP
Is there somewhere else than http://www.centos.org/docs/ for
documentation for CentOS 6?
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi Mark,
probably you know it, but maybe someone else finds this useful:
On 07.11.2012, at 19:56, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Is there somewhere else than http://www.centos.org/docs/ for
documentation for CentOS 6?
https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/
Since the
On 7.11.2012 19:56, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Is there somewhere else than http://www.centos.org/docs/ for
documentation for CentOS 6?
I think because CentOS is a clone of Upstream it would be a waste of
resources to duplicate the documentation effort.
In other words: read upstreams
Hi, Peter,
Peter Eckel wrote:
probably you know it, but maybe someone else finds this useful:
On 07.11.2012, at 19:56, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Is there somewhere else than http://www.centos.org/docs/ for
documentation for CentOS 6?
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:37 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Since the documents available on the CentOS documentation pages are mostly
the ones for RHEL anyway that shouldn't make too much of a difference.
That may do. I'm still working on the correct config file for the LVM that
I'm upgrading
Am 05.11.2012 19:28, schrieb James A. Peltier:
- Original Message -
| Hi,
|
| am using latest C6 on a Dell GX270 with latest Bios.
| It fails to power down but restarts when running
| $ sudo poweroff
|
| I tried some google hints for kernel boot option:
| acpi=force
| no help,
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Rainer Traut
Sent: den 6 november 2012 13:53
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: Dell GX270 fails to power down (but reboots)
Thx for all your answers, but latest Bios
Am 05.11.2012 12:09, schrieb Nux!:
On 05.11.2012 10:38, Rainer Traut wrote:
Hi,
am using latest C6 on a Dell GX270 with latest Bios.
It fails to power down but restarts when running
$ sudo poweroff
I tried some google hints for kernel boot option:
acpi=force
no help, looks like acpi is
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Behalf
Of Rainer Traut
Thx for all your answers, but latest Bios is installed (A07 from year
2006). The pc is has not crashed so far, except the poweroff thingy so
I guess
hw is ok. FWIW under C5 all was well.
A wild shot; if you have physical access to the computer, could
Try e1000e or http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-e1000
Em 06/11/2012 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us escreveu:
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Behalf
Of Rainer Traut
Thx for all your answers, but latest Bios is installed (A07 from year
2006). The pc is has not crashed so far, except the poweroff thingy so
I guess
Am 06.11.2012 um 13:52 schrieb Rainer Traut:
Am 05.11.2012 19:28, schrieb James A. Peltier:
Update the BIOS. Should fix it. We had this issue a while back and the new
BIOS corrected the issue.
Thx for all your answers, but latest Bios is installed (A07 from year 2006).
The pc is has
Hi,
am using latest C6 on a Dell GX270 with latest Bios.
It fails to power down but restarts when running
$ sudo poweroff
I tried some google hints for kernel boot option:
acpi=force
no help, looks like acpi is working anyway when looking in dmesg
acpi=off
makes e1000 nic fail to initialize
Any
On 05.11.2012 10:38, Rainer Traut wrote:
Hi,
am using latest C6 on a Dell GX270 with latest Bios.
It fails to power down but restarts when running
$ sudo poweroff
I tried some google hints for kernel boot option:
acpi=force
no help, looks like acpi is working anyway when looking in dmesg
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Rainer Traut
Sent: den 5 november 2012 11:39
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Centos 6: Dell GX270 fails to power down (but reboots)
am using latest C6 on a Dell GX270 with latest
- Original Message -
| Hi,
|
| am using latest C6 on a Dell GX270 with latest Bios.
| It fails to power down but restarts when running
| $ sudo poweroff
|
| I tried some google hints for kernel boot option:
| acpi=force
| no help, looks like acpi is working anyway when looking in dmesg
|
I'm working with a company who is running into an issue occasionally
with their app running CentOS 6 on an NFS mount. The problem is
essentially that, from a single CentOS 6 client, the client sometimes
gets the wrong file size back from a stat() call.
The problem specifically seems to happen
On 10/22/2012 11:31 PM, Tom McDonald wrote:
I'm working with a company who is running into an issue occasionally
with their app running CentOS 6 on an NFS mount. The problem is
essentially that, from a single CentOS 6 client, the client sometimes
gets the wrong file size back from a stat()
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Patrick Lists
centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote:
Just a thought: could this be related to 32bit clients accessing a 64bit
NFS server? Recently there was some discussion about this on the list.
Iirc the solution was to use 32bit inodes on the NFS server. Search
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Johnny Hughes wrote:
There are things there for el5 ... nothing for el6.
But that repo came about before EPEL and I would say most things from
there are now in EPEL ... I would only use it if it contained something
that was not in EPEL or rpmforge and I really needed
Johnny Hughes wrote:
The main CentOS repos are the same ... Base, Updates, CentOSPlus,
Extras, Fasttrack, CR
The major 3rd Party repos also exist ... rpmforge, elrepo, EPEL ... I
those are the ones I normally use for both 5.x and 6.x
I see I also have kbsingh-CentOS-Extras .
Is that still
On 10/19/2012 07:41 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
The main CentOS repos are the same ... Base, Updates, CentOSPlus,
Extras, Fasttrack, CR
The major 3rd Party repos also exist ... rpmforge, elrepo, EPEL ... I
those are the ones I normally use for both 5.x and 6.x
I see I
On 18.10.2012 17:36, Keith Roberts wrote:
Is there any differences between the repos used by Centos
5.8 and those used by Centos 6.x please - ie does C6 use the
same 3rd party repos as C5 does?
Is there a Centos wiki article for C6 repos?
Kind Regards,
Keith
I also maintain some repos
On 10/19/2012 11:07 AM, Nux! wrote:
On 18.10.2012 17:36, Keith Roberts wrote:
Is there any differences between the repos used by Centos
5.8 and those used by Centos 6.x please - ie does C6 use the
same 3rd party repos as C5 does?
Is there a Centos wiki article for C6 repos?
Kind Regards,
Is there any differences between the repos used by Centos
5.8 and those used by Centos 6.x please - ie does C6 use the
same 3rd party repos as C5 does?
Is there a Centos wiki article for C6 repos?
Kind Regards,
Keith
---
Websites:
On 10/18/12 9:36 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
Is there any differences between the repos used by Centos
5.8 and those used by Centos 6.x please - ie does C6 use the
same 3rd party repos as C5 does?
Is there a Centos wiki article for C6 repos?
3rd party repo quality is all over the place.
On 10/18/2012 11:36 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
Is there any differences between the repos used by Centos
5.8 and those used by Centos 6.x please - ie does C6 use the
same 3rd party repos as C5 does?
Is there a Centos wiki article for C6 repos?
The main CentOS repos are the same ... Base,
Hello,
I am using an up to date CentOS 6 x86_64 laptop (Thinkpad X220t) and
after struggling a bit I could install it a few months ago with a pure
EFI boot.
However, I am not really satisfied with such things as stability,
power consumption, etc. and now that I have a little more time I want
to
On 15.10.2012 09:31, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
Hello,
I am using an up to date CentOS 6 x86_64 laptop (Thinkpad X220t) and
after struggling a bit I could install it a few months ago with a
pure
EFI boot.
However, I am not really satisfied with such things as stability,
power consumption,
Hi,
On 10/15/2012 09:31 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I am using an up to date CentOS 6 x86_64 laptop (Thinkpad X220t) and
after struggling a bit I could install it a few months ago with a pure
EFI boot.
Are you sure it wasent doing a bios failback ? I'd be surprised to see a
device like that
Hi,
Not sure about the EFI as I'm avoiding it as the plague, but on Intel
platforms there are some issues regarding power consumption. Here's what
I do:
http://www.nux.ro/archive/2012/10/EL6_power_usage_optimisation_on_Intel_Sandy___Ivy_Bridge.html
that article looks quite out of date,
On 15.10.2012 10:45, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
Not sure about the EFI as I'm avoiding it as the plague, but on
Intel
platforms there are some issues regarding power consumption. Here's
what
I do:
On 10/15/2012 03:21 AM, Nux! wrote:
Why outdated? I just wrote it! :-))
I've tested those directions on a new Thinkpad (T430s) after finding
them posted in many places and found no measurable power use difference.
Using powertop, however, does produce significant improvements.
The most
On 10/15/2012 01:31 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
- Does EFI impacts other things than the boot sequence? (a friend of
mine told me that this is a complete replacement of BIOS, and thus
impacts everything)
EFI will primarily impact driver initialization. If you saw a problem,
it would be during
Am 11.09.2012 21:57, schrieb Laurent:
Le 2012-09-11 21:06, Tilman Schmidt a écrit :
I tried two different CentOS 6 VMs. Both have the latest standard kernel
(2.6.32-279.5.2.el6.x86_64). Both run perfectly fine on one of the other
VMware hosts still running ESXi 4.1.0 build 702113. On build
Am 11.09.2012 21:14, schrieb John R Pierce:
On 09/11/12 12:06 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
I tried two different CentOS 6 VMs. Both have the latest standard kernel
(2.6.32-279.5.2.el6.x86_64). Both run perfectly fine on one of the other
VMware hosts still running ESXi 4.1.0 build 702113. On
Am 11.09.2012 21:06, schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
I tried two different CentOS 6 VMs. Both have the latest standard kernel
(2.6.32-279.5.2.el6.x86_64). Both run perfectly fine on one of the other
VMware hosts still running ESXi 4.1.0 build 702113. On build 800380,
both display the GRUB menu alright
I run VMware vSphere 4 Essentials with three almost identically
configured ESXi 4.1 hosts and a mix of 32 and 64 bit guests including
Windows 2003 and 2008 as well as CentOS 5 and 6. Recently I updated one
of the hosts to build 800380. The new build runs Windows and CentOS 5
VMs fine, but CentOS 6
On 09/11/12 12:06 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
I run VMware vSphere 4 Essentials with three almost identically
configured ESXi 4.1 hosts and a mix of 32 and 64 bit guests including
Windows 2003 and 2008 as well as CentOS 5 and 6. Recently I updated one
of the hosts to build 800380. The new build
Le 2012-09-11 21:06, Tilman Schmidt a écrit :
I run VMware vSphere 4 Essentials with three almost identically
configured ESXi 4.1 hosts and a mix of 32 and 64 bit guests including
Windows 2003 and 2008 as well as CentOS 5 and 6. Recently I updated
one
of the hosts to build 800380. The new
Am 11.09.2012 21:14, schrieb John R Pierce:
On 09/11/12 12:06 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
I tried two different CentOS 6 VMs. Both have the latest standard kernel
(2.6.32-279.5.2.el6.x86_64). Both run perfectly fine on one of the other
VMware hosts still running ESXi 4.1.0 build 702113. On
Am 11.09.2012 21:57, schrieb Laurent:
I've found what is probably your post on VMware Communities.
http://communities.vmware.com/message/2112173?tstart=0
Indeed.
It seems there's a second 4.1 update 3 build (811144):
Hi all,
I read some where that due to UUID conflicts, EXT4 + LVM snapshots is still the
way to go in Cent 6.
I do love XFS but was wondering your thoughts and experiences.
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hello,
I made some statistics and comparisons about security advisories
published by three popular RHEL 6 clones: CentOS 6, Oracle Linux 6 and
Scientific Linux 6.
The article is available at the following URL:
http://bitrate.epipe.com/rhel-vs-centos-scientific-oracle-linux-6_187
I hope you
On 08/20/2012 07:02 AM, Janne Snabb wrote:
Hello,
I made some statistics and comparisons about security advisories
published by three popular RHEL 6 clones: CentOS 6, Oracle Linux 6 and
Scientific Linux 6.
The article is available at the following URL:
These could be bad options for a number of users and since it's set at
kernel boot time how can you override it once the OS has booted? Can you
disable this without altering boot parameters and rebooting? If the answer
is yes than a tuned configuration should be created or altered to set
You could also consider just sticking to tuned and then having a look at the
power management options as provided there. tuned-adm list will show you
some predefined power management options which *can* be tweaked.
I have made many tests with tuned and written small scripts to switch
from
On 03/08/12 17:05, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
As per http://www.williambrownstreet.net/blog/?p=387, add the
following kernel arguments to the GRUB boot configuration:
pcie_aspm=force i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 i915.lvds_downclock=1
i915.i915_enable_fbc=1
As measured using PowerTop, this made the
Hello,
I was not happy with the power consumption of CentOS 6 x86_64 on a new
Lenovo Thinkpad x220 Tablet and I worked on reducing it. I just wanted
to share with the list one of the changes which gave me the most
significant improvement.
As per http://www.williambrownstreet.net/blog/?p=387, add
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Mathieu Baudier mbaud...@argeo.org wrote:
pcie_aspm=force i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 i915.lvds_downclock=1
i915.i915_enable_fbc=1
Interesting as now I'm using RHEL 6.3 on T400.
Would that make the notebook slower?
--
http://linux3.arinet.org
pcie_aspm=force i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 i915.lvds_downclock=1
i915.i915_enable_fbc=1
Interesting as now I'm using RHEL 6.3 on T400.
Would that make the notebook slower?
I did not notice any change in performance so far.
(Tested with parallelized, offline, Java build and unit tests)
On 03/08/12 08:05, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
Hello,
I was not happy with the power consumption of CentOS 6 x86_64 on a new
Lenovo Thinkpad x220 Tablet and I worked on reducing it. I just wanted
to share with the list one of the changes which gave me the most
significant improvement.
As per
- Original Message -
| Hello,
|
| I was not happy with the power consumption of CentOS 6 x86_64 on a
| new
| Lenovo Thinkpad x220 Tablet and I worked on reducing it. I just
| wanted
| to share with the list one of the changes which gave me the most
| significant improvement.
|
| As per
Hi all,
I am having trouble with installing skype.
I downloaded the 2.2 version via the official site, I installed by
typing rpm-i but now quadno the launch the application does not start.
do you know how to fix it?
thanks in advance
___
CentOS mailing
From: Paolo De Michele pa...@paolodemichele.it
I am having trouble with installing skype.
I downloaded the 2.2 version via the official site, I installed by
typing rpm-i but now quadno the launch the application does not start.
do you know how to fix it?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype
I was curious, why was /proc/ide removed and was it moved to another directory
to obtain ide drivers information?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 27/07/2012 15:58, TFML wrote:
I was curious, why was /proc/ide removed and was it moved to another
directory to obtain ide drivers information?
From the upstream vendor's deployment guide[0]: Later versions of the
2.6 kernel have made the /proc/ide/ and /proc/pci/ directories obsolete.
Laurence, Thank you for the information!
On Jul 27, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Laurence Hurst l.a.hu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
On 27/07/2012 15:58, TFML wrote:
I was curious, why was /proc/ide removed and was it moved to another
directory to obtain ide drivers information?
From the upstream vendor's
The setup works well for different kernel. So it is not a problem with
the configuration ;)
Thanks for all help.
Best regards,
R.
2012/7/4 Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com:
On 06/25/2012 05:22 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
Do you see an error in my configuration? Why is 10.20.0.108 not available?
Yes, it works well, no problems then.
Best regards,
Rafal,
2012/6/26 Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com:
On 06/26/2012 08:51 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Are you absolutely sure that the switch port connected to eth0 is
configured to deliver tagged packets for VLAN 20 (and that the ping
source is
ip route show
192.168.2.0/24 dev vmbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.203
193.218.152.0/24 dev vmbr0 proto kernel scope link src 193.218.152.219
10.20.0.0/16 dev vmbr20 proto kernel scope link src 10.20.0.108
169.254.0.0/16 dev vmbr0 scope link metric 1003
169.254.0.0/16 dev
tcpdump -n -i eth0.20
shows that there is no traffic when I try to ping 10.20.0.108.
Best regards,
R.
2012/6/26 Rafał Radecki radecki.ra...@gmail.com:
ip route show
192.168.2.0/24 dev vmbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.203
193.218.152.0/24 dev vmbr0 proto kernel scope link src
On 06/26/12 12:47 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
tcpdump -n -i eth0.20
shows that there is no traffic when I try to ping 10.20.0.108.
try just tcpdump -n -i eth0
I am not sure you can packet sniff a virtual interface, more likely you
can only sniff an actual physical interface.
--
john r pierce
tcpdump -n -i eth0 icmp and src host 10.20.0.98
does not give any results when ping is invoked.
2012/6/26 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com:
On 06/26/12 12:47 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
tcpdump -n -i eth0.20
shows that there is no traffic when I try to ping 10.20.0.108.
try just tcpdump -n -i
On 06/26/2012 12:02 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
Any clue?
Are you absolutely sure that the switch port connected to eth0 is
configured to deliver tagged packets for VLAN 20 (and that the ping
source is also on that VLAN)?
___
CentOS mailing list
On 06/26/2012 08:51 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Are you absolutely sure that the switch port connected to eth0 is
configured to deliver tagged packets for VLAN 20 (and that the ping
source is also on that VLAN)?
...and I should follow that up with:
If you create a tagged ethernet interface on
Hi all.
I have currently an OpenVZ server:
uname -a
Linux vader8.superhost.pl 2.6.32-042stab055.16 #1 SMP Fri Jun 8
19:22:28 MSD 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 6.2 (Final)
lspci | grep -i eth
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co.,
Rafał Radecki wrote:
Hi all.
I have currently an OpenVZ server:
uname -a
Linux vader8.superhost.pl 2.6.32-042stab055.16 #1 SMP Fri Jun 8
19:22:28 MSD 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 6.2 (Final)
snip
I don't even remember that kernel for 6.2. The
On 06/25/2012 05:22 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
Do you see an error in my configuration? Why is 10.20.0.108 not available?
Not immediately, but check the output of the 'ip' tools. ifconfig and
route are deprecated:
ip route show
ip addr show
Finally, see if there's any incoming traffic on the
On 6/10/12, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:09:28PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
#raid / --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --device=md0 raid.253001 raid.253065
Maybe try
raid / --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --device=md0 --useexisting
Or
raid / --fstype=ext4
On 06/14/12 10:51 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
True Enough but the adsl Ip range is not in my control as you have
assumed correctly.
when you bridge virtual hosts to a LAN, they appear just like they are
real machines plugged into the same LAN. they'll each get their own IP
from the ADSL router's
On 06/14/12 10:51 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
You still don't say what kind of access you need
Basically accessing the VMs from the Internetssh, vnc, rdp, ftp
so on...different needs for different vm.
how will that work if you have no control over the ADSL internet
router? the internet
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Sanjay Arora sanjay.k.ar...@gmail.com wrote:
You still don't say what kind of access you need
Basically accessing the VMs from the Internetssh, vnc, rdp, ftp
so on...different needs for different vm.
You should be able to make outbound connections that
On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:52 AM, Sanjay Arora sanjay.k.ar...@gmail.com wrote:
My machine is on LAN 192.168.1.0/24, has an IP of 192.168.1.3. This
Network has GW 192.168.1.1 which is an adsl router in the office. No
firewall on the router. Other LAN machines have IPs in the
192.168.1.0/24 network
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Sanjay Arora sanjay.k.ar...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK, I don't quite understand what 'reserved for LAN' use means. I'll
assume it means someone else controls it and they won't cooperate
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
It might be easier to suggest an approach if you describe what you
need to do. You can't magically make new public addresses that aren't
available appear on an existing network, whether it is on real or
virtual NICs.
On 06/12/12 11:52 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
And I want routing among three as well as Internet access through thet
NATTED adsl router which has a dynamic IP.
for that sort of routing to work, all the other hosts on hte 2 LANs will
need to know the route to that subnet is via the NIC interfaces
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Sanjay Arora sanjay.k.ar...@gmail.com wrote:
It might be easier to suggest an approach if you describe what you
need to do. You can't magically make new public addresses that aren't
available appear on an existing network, whether it is on real or
virtual
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 06/11/2012 12:45 AM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
But that segregated network does not have access to the Internetor
am I wrong?
You're wrong. The automatically created network will have internet
access via NAT.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
No. Multi-homing in this fashion is complex. You will require advanced
routing on all of the guests to accomplish it.
Shorewall makes this easier, but you'll need to create multiple routing
tables using 'ip route',
On 06/11/12 11:58 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
Thanks. But through NAT inward access would not be possible...right?
NAT only provides outward access.
you can port forward specific protocols through NAT
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca
On 06/11/2012 11:58 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
Thanks. But through NAT inward access would not be possible...right?
NAT only provides outward access.
Yes, but you said that you couldn't make changes to the existing
network. If that's true, then you can't add a route from the existing
network to
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 06/11/2012 11:58 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
Thanks. But through NAT inward access would not be possible...right?
NAT only provides outward access.
Yes, but you said that you couldn't make changes to the existing
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Gordon Messmer
If you want to use NAT and keep your guests in a segregated network,
that is exactly how the default install behaves. You don't have to do
any network-specific configuration.
But that segregated network does not have access to the Internetor
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Sanjay Arora sanjay.k.ar...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Gordon Messmer
If you want to use NAT and keep your guests in a segregated network,
that is exactly how the default install behaves. You don't have to do
any network-specific
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Ross Cavanagh ross@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just jumping in and may not have read everything, but having the NAT
option will still allow Internet access to the guest if the host is setup
to allow this (which is the default on most virtual hosts as far as I'm
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Ross Cavanagh ross@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just jumping in and may not have read everything, but having the NAT
option will still allow Internet access to the guest if the host is setup
to allow this (which is the default on most virtual hosts as far as
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Ross Cavanagh ross@gmail.com wrote:
Now, traffic among these three networks will be routed automatically
or do I have to put in some code to enable traffic between these three
networks internet access to the virtual host ltsp network?
It shouldn't be a
On 06/11/2012 12:45 AM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
But that segregated network does not have access to the Internetor
am I wrong?
You're wrong. The automatically created network will have internet
access via NAT.
___
CentOS mailing list
On 06/11/2012 03:22 AM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
Now I wonder why I did not think of so simple an idea! Simply put in a
multi-port NIC card,
Another questions...I put in another network port I end up with 3
NICs 3 bridges...One providing Internet access, One providing
routing to virtual hosts
I'm trying to install a bunch of C6 involving initially degraded mdadm RAID 1
Anaconda refuses to let me create a RAID 1 array with only one member.
Based on some reading, it seems that I should be able to use kickstart
with the PRE scripts to do this. However, after trying for a couple of
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 09:34:16PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Based on some reading, it seems that I should be able to use kickstart
with the PRE scripts to do this. However, after trying for a couple of
hours, it doesn't seem that anaconda will allow it, it just boots the
created
On 6/10/12, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Can you do what you want via the GUI installer? Potentially by dropping
into a shell to do parts of it (eg build the raid array degreaded,
then use the GUI to install onto that). If so, manually do an install
and then look at
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:09:28PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
#raid / --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --device=md0 raid.253001 raid.253065
Maybe try
raid / --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --device=md0 --useexisting
Or
raid / --fstype=ext4 --device=md0 --useexisting
is I can't figure how to kickstart
501 - 600 of 1751 matches
Mail list logo
