On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Digimer wrote:
That was hardly called for. If you find a post off topic or
uninteresting, just delete it. Either no one will reply or, if there is
interest in the question, others will and the question will be decided
to have value.
wrong
Seemingly you feel it is proper
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 16:26 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
How was Russ's reply rude? He actually took the time to explain
things... and remained civil doing it.
Can we discontinue this and return to tranquillity please ?
Paul.
___
CentOS
On 09/01/2011 07:58 PM, Tom H wrote:
Poettering says in
his blog that you can have /usr on a separate partition if you mount
it in the initramfs. With dracut, it means using --add fstab-sys (or
adding fstab-sys to the /etc/dracut.conf modules list) and
creating an /etc/fstab.sys with a /usr
Can we discontinue this and return to tranquillity please ?
Paul.
Paul,
with all humility due respect, if I was given authority within CentOS and
on this list, you would be one of the first we would discipline...
- rh
___
CentOS mailing
You've already received some good responses so I won't rehash a
lot of what was said. However here are few more comments without
a lot of backing detail (but it should give you enough info to
google for detail):
1. Despite the RedHat link someone provided, I think the advice of
putting almost
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:02 PM, R - elists list...@abbacomm.net wrote:
Can we discontinue this and return to tranquillity please ?
Paul.
Paul,
with all humility due respect, if I was given authority within CentOS and
on this list, you would be one of the first we would
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:02 PM, R - elists list...@abbacomm.net wrote:
- rh
Russ why don't you just discipline everyone? Cause no-one can stick to
CentOS-only conversations in your righteous eyes.
Rudi,
I know it is confusing to you , as Robert
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 14:34 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:02 PM, R - elists list...@abbacomm.net wrote:
- rh
Russ why don't you just discipline everyone? Cause no-one can stick to
CentOS-only conversations in your
Thank you to everyone who responded and contributed to this topic. I
appreciate it greatly!
On 9/2/2011 12:03 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
You've already received some good responses so I won't rehash a
lot of what was said. However here are few more comments without
a lot of backing detail (but
Thank you to everyone who responded and contributed to this topic. I
appreciate it greatly!
On 9/2/2011 11:27 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 09/01/2011 07:58 PM, Tom H wrote:
Poettering says in
his blog that you can have /usr on a separate partition if you mount
it in the initramfs. With
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Does rpm -qi autofs show nothing? If so, I'm a tad surprised, since that
takes care of not only nfs but also CD/DVDs and USB keys.
I don't believe that's true.
jh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 08/31/2011 09:21 PM Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
Good Evening All,
I have a question regarding CentOS 6 server partitioning. Now I know
there are a lot of different ways to partition the system and different
opinions depending on the use of the server. I currently have a quad
core intel
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, ken wrote:
In the absence of actual evidence to the contrary, I'd go with the
recommendations in the docs regarding swap.
Personally, I think that advice needs updating for machines with large amounts
of memory to include an upper bound. In general use I'm not sure I can
On Thursday, September 01, 2011 03:21:25 AM Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
Good Evening All,
I have a question regarding CentOS 6 server partitioning. Now I know
there are a lot of different ways to partition the system and different
opinions depending on the use of the server. I currently have a
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 10:07:01 PM Always Learning wrote:
I assume your machine is a single user machine. If so, I would suggest
He stated clearly in his request that this was for a server, by definition a
multi-user machine (each server process should, after all, run as a unique
user)
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 10:07:01 PM Always Learning wrote:
I assume your machine is a single user machine. If so, I would suggest
He stated clearly in his request that this was for a server, by definition a
multi-user
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:19 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
just goes to show how well people actually read anything on the
internet these days. and then they can't understand why the original
poster gets irritated when he's told to use a hammer to hit the nail
into the wall, when asked what color
Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:19 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
just goes to show how well people actually read anything on the
internet these days. and then they can't understand why the original
poster gets irritated when he's told to use a hammer to hit the nail
into the
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 09:54 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I missed the thread overnight (for me), but the way I used to recommend it
is part of my article, which you can read at
http://24.5-cent.us/upgrading_linux.doc These days, our default here at
work is:
/boot is 200M (we'll probably
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:22:42 +, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be
frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
settings-personal.desktop and settings-system.desktop.
The DNS response is always:No such name. Do tell! These
Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 09:54 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I missed the thread overnight (for me), but the way I used to recommend
it is part of my article, which you can read at
http://24.5-cent.us/upgrading_linux.doc These days, our default here
at work is:
/boot is
From: Jonathan Vomacka juvi...@gmail.com
I have a question regarding CentOS 6 server partitioning.
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/s2-diskpartrecommend-x86.html
___
CentOS mailing list
On 09/01/2011 12:20 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
On 08/31/2011 08:51 PM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
In the past this was my partition scheme:
Root filesystem (/) = 10240MB (10GB)
/boot = 200MB
swap = 1024MB (1GB)
/var = 20480MB (20GB)
/tmp = 10240MB (10GB)
/usr = 51200MB (50GB)
/home = all
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 09:21:25 PM Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
I was
recently told that this is an old style of partitioning and is not used
in modern day Linux distributions.
The only thing old-style I saw in your list was the separate /usr partition. I
like having separate /var,
In KDE 4, I click:
Kickoff System Settings Network Connectivity
Network Settings Network Settings
I get a popup informing me that my system is not supported.
(This did not happen before.) I am offered choices.
I choose RedHat 6.0 (Is this wrong? I also tried
RedHat 9.0.).
I select
Michael D. Berger wrote:
In KDE 4, I click:
Kickoff System Settings Network Connectivity
Network Settings Network Settings
I get a popup informing me that my system is not supported.
(This did not happen before.) I am offered choices.
I choose RedHat 6.0 (Is this wrong? I also
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Simon Matter simon.mat...@invoca.ch wrote:
On 08/31/2011 08:51 PM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
In the past this was my partition scheme:
Root filesystem (/) = 10240MB (10GB)
/boot = 200MB
swap = 1024MB (1GB)
/var = 20480MB (20GB)
/tmp = 10240MB (10GB)
/usr =
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:03:07 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
Michael D. Berger wrote:
In KDE 4, I click:
Kickoff System Settings Network Connectivity
Network Settings Network Settings
I get a popup informing me that my system is not supported. (This did
not happen
Lamar,
Excellent email. Thank you so much you have been very informative!!!
On 9/1/2011 11:29 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 09:21:25 PM Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
I was
recently told that this is an old style of partitioning and is not used
in modern day Linux
John Doe,
Thanks, This is a good read and makes me feel better about splitting
partitions.
On 9/1/2011 11:17 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Jonathan Vomackajuvi...@gmail.com
I have a question regarding CentOS 6 server partitioning.
On 9/1/2011 1:19 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Simon Mattersimon.mat...@invoca.ch wrote:
from
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/s2-diskpartrecommend-x86.html
Do not place /usr on a separate partition If /usr is on a
Michael D. Berger wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:03:07 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
Michael D. Berger wrote:
In KDE 4, I click:
Kickoff System Settings Network Connectivity
Network Settings Network Settings
I get a popup informing me that my system is not supported.
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:33:16 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
[...]
ACK! Hedwig is about 10 years old. History: RH 1,2,3,4,5 (where I
started using RH), 5.2,6 (Hedwig),7,7.1,7.2,7.3,8,9 (Shrike),
RHEL1?2?,RHEL 3,RHEL 4, RHEL 5, and just this year, RHEL 6.
Something's wrong with
Michael D. Berger wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:33:16 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
[...]
ACK! Hedwig is about 10 years old. History: RH 1,2,3,4,5 (where I
started using RH), 5.2,6 (Hedwig),7,7.1,7.2,7.3,8,9 (Shrike),
RHEL1?2?,RHEL 3,RHEL 4, RHEL 5, and just this year, RHEL 6.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:44 PM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote:
On 9/1/2011 1:19 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Simon Mattersimon.mat...@invoca.ch wrote:
from
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:03:35 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
Michael D. Berger wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:33:16 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw
wrote: [...]
ACK! Hedwig is about 10 years old. History: RH 1,2,3,4,5 (where I
started using RH), 5.2,6
digiKam is found, I had epel, rpm forge, and base CentOS repos... others not
by default, maybe if you search http://rpm.pbone.net/
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:30 PM, CS DBA cs_...@consistentstate.com wrote:
Hi all;
does anyone know if the following packages are available (via yum) for
CentOS 6
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 01:04:14 +, Michael D. Berger wrote:
[...]
It is a laptop. I have not been able to get it to work on the command
line. Perhaps it would help if I remove NetworkManager? Also, there is
probably not enough in my ifcfg-wlan0. I can see what is my ifcfg-eth0,
but what
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears
to be frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
settings-personal.desktop and settings-system.desktop.
The DNS response is always:No such name. Do tell!
These appear especially when I click on things on the KDE
menus. On my
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears
to be frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
settings-personal.desktop and settings-system.desktop.
The DNS response is always:No such name. Do tell!
These appear
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:02:09 +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be
frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
settings-personal.desktop and settings-system.desktop.
The DNS
Michael D. Berger wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:02:09 +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be
frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
settings-personal.desktop and
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:19:05 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
Michael D. Berger wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:02:09 +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be
frequent nonsensical
Hi all;
does anyone know if the following packages are available (via yum) for
CentOS 6 and if so which repo they come from?
Thanks in advance...
kmymoney
darktable
digiKam
--
-
Kevin Kempter - Constent State
A PostgreSQL
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:30 -0600, CS DBA wrote:
Hi all;
does anyone know if the following packages are available (via yum) for
CentOS 6 and if so which repo they come from?
Thanks in advance...
kmymoney
darktable
digiKam
You might try #yum --enablerepo=reponame search kmymoney
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:22:42 +, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be
frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
settings-personal.desktop and settings-system.desktop.
The DNS response is always:No such name. Do tell! These
On 8/31/2011 3:30 PM, CS DBA wrote:
Hi all;
does anyone know if the following packages are available (via yum) for
CentOS 6 and if so which repo they come from?
Thanks in advance...
kmymoney
darktable
digiKam
You could try the search page at:
http://pkgs.org/search/
I didn't get
Good Evening All,
I have a question regarding CentOS 6 server partitioning. Now I know
there are a lot of different ways to partition the system and different
opinions depending on the use of the server. I currently have a quad
core intel system running 8GB of RAM with 1 TB hard drive
*Re-sending as it appears my original e-mail did not go through*.
Good Evening All,
I have a question regarding CentOS 6 server partitioning. Now I know
there are a lot of different ways to partition the system and different
opinions depending on the use of the server. I currently have a quad
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 21:28 -0400, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
*Re-sending as it appears my original e-mail did not go through*.
Good Evening All,
Bon soir.
Both version of your email were received in Europe.
On the subject of SWAP, I'm working on a standalone server with 8 GB RAM
and a AMD
Paul,
Thanks for your reply. I have heard the suggestion of not using SWAP
which is fine. My curiosity on the SWAP subject is now what happens if
all memory is used or an application has a memory leak. Does the server
crash if there is no SWAP and all available RAM is used? Will SWAP cause
On 08/31/11 6:28 PM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
1) What is a good partition map/schema for a server OS where it's
primary purpose is for a LAMP server, DNS (bind), and possibly gameservers
my servers generally have 2 disks mirrored for the OS, then 2 or more
disks in a raid for the application
John,
The server which is housed at the datacenter only has a single 1TB
drive. Just to confirm, LVM allows you to increase and decrease space on
any partition on the fly, but setting each volume manually with EXT4 is
a physical mount?
If I were to set hard limits by setting each volume on
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 21:41 -0400, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
Also, any help you can give me regarding a partition map would be great.
I'm probably different to many of the others who seem to have fixed
ideas. I'm relatively new to Linux but not to computers.
I assume your machine is a single
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 21:51 -0400, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
Root filesystem (/) = 10240MB (10GB)
/boot = 200MB
swap = 1024MB (1GB)
/var = 20480MB (20GB)
/tmp = 10240MB (10GB)
/usr = 51200MB (50GB)
/home = all remaining space on the drive
You can just allocate the drive and Centos will
On 08/31/11 7:07 PM, Always Learning wrote:
I assume
Which part of LAMP server didn't you read?
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:41 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 08/31/11 7:07 PM, Always Learning wrote:
I assume
Which part of LAMP server didn't you read?
I read none of it. Why ask such time-wasting questions ? Go and have a
cup of tea, pull-out your network card and settle down for the night
On 08/31/2011 08:51 PM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
In the past this was my partition scheme:
Root filesystem (/) = 10240MB (10GB)
/boot = 200MB
swap = 1024MB (1GB)
/var = 20480MB (20GB)
/tmp = 10240MB (10GB)
/usr = 51200MB (50GB)
/home = all remaining space on the drive
Having /usr
On 08/31/11 7:43 PM, Always Learning wrote:
I read none of it.
figures. the original post asked...
1) What is a good partition map/schema for a server OS where it's
primary purpose is for a LAMP server, DNS (bind), and possibly gameservers
and you take off on a tangent about multiple small
On 08/31/11 6:51 PM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
The server which is housed at the datacenter only has a single 1TB
drive. Just to confirm, LVM allows you to increase and decrease space on
any partition on the fly, but setting each volume manually with EXT4 is
a physical mount?
shrinking file
The server which is housed at the datacenter only has a single 1TB
drive. Just to confirm, LVM allows you to increase and decrease space on
any partition on the fly, but setting each volume manually with EXT4 is
a physical mount?
If I were to set hard limits by setting each volume on EXT4
On 08/31/2011 08:51 PM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
In the past this was my partition scheme:
Root filesystem (/) = 10240MB (10GB)
/boot = 200MB
swap = 1024MB (1GB)
/var = 20480MB (20GB)
/tmp = 10240MB (10GB)
/usr = 51200MB (50GB)
/home = all remaining space on the drive
Having /usr
Hallo,
for using the ipv6 neighbor functions, I have to execute commands like
ip -6 neigh add proxy 2001::211:d8ff:fe97:3273 dev eth0
to publish the ip of computers in the subnet.
To execute them on reboot, I have included these commands in /etc/rc.d/rc.local
Also after each restart of the
On my old CentOS 5, when it boots up (to level 3) it displays
a line for each of the things it is starting as it does it. I
found that quite useful. On my new CentOS 6, while it is
booting up, it displays a useless CentOS trademark picture.
Is there a way to get the old kind of display in CentOS
Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my old CentOS 5, when it boots up (to level 3) it displays
a line for each of the things it is starting as it does it. I
found that quite useful. On my new CentOS 6, while it is
booting up, it displays a useless CentOS trademark picture.
Is there a way to get the
At 11:52 AM 8/29/2011, you wrote:
On my old CentOS 5, when it boots up (to level 3) it displays
a line for each of the things it is starting as it does it. I
found that quite useful. On my new CentOS 6, while it is
booting up, it displays a useless CentOS trademark picture.
Is there a way to get
On my CentOS 6:
chkconfig --list wpa_supplicant
shows off at all levels, which is confirmed by examination of:
/etc/init.d/wpa_supplicant
but ps -ef shows the process running.
Furthermore, repeated
cd /etc/init.d/
./wpa_supplicant stop
appears to succeed, but the process continues to
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:35:18PM +, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my CentOS 6:
chkconfig --list wpa_supplicant
shows off at all levels, which is confirmed by examination of:
/etc/init.d/wpa_supplicant
but ps -ef shows the process running.
Furthermore, repeated
cd /etc/init.d/
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:36:13 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:35:18PM +, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my CentOS 6:
chkconfig --list wpa_supplicant
shows off at all levels, which is confirmed by examination of:
/etc/init.d/wpa_supplicant
but ps -ef shows the
On my old CentOS 5 KDE, if I add a link to ~/Desktop, it
appears on the desktop as an icon. But on my new CentOS 6
KDE, this does not work. How can I make it work?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Michael D. Berger writes:
On my old CentOS 5 KDE, if I add a link to ~/Desktop, it
appears on the desktop as an icon. But on my new CentOS 6
KDE, this does not work. How can I make it work?
Mike,
The difference between KDe 3.5 and KDE 4 that ships with Centos 6.0 is quite
huge and a LOT
On Thursday 25 Aug 2011 Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my laptop, I have not been able to get KDE to run; I
always get gnome. I installed selecting KDE, and I tried
yum groupinstall, which appeared to work, but I still get
gnome running. BTW, I boot to level 3, and run startx.
The session you
On Friday 26 Aug 2011 Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my old CentOS 5 KDE, if I add a link to ~/Desktop, it
appears on the desktop as an icon. But on my new CentOS 6
KDE, this does not work.
The reason is that Desktop is quite simply a directory - remember how it fits
into the file system
On my newly installed CentOS 6 I am running KDE (I think; I selected it
in the setup, but how would I know?). It has three default icons:
Computer; Root's Home; Trash. I do not see them in /root/Desktop.
How can I remove them?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
From: Michael D. Berger m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com
On my newly installed CentOS 6 I am running KDE (I think; I selected it
in the setup, but how would I know?).
Only God would know...
It has three default icons:
Computer; Root's Home; Trash. I do not see them in /root/Desktop.
How can I
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:00:16 -0700, John Doe wrote:
From: Michael D. Berger
m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com
On my newly installed CentOS 6 I am running KDE (I think; I selected it
in the setup, but how would I know?).
Only God would know...
It has three default icons:
Computer; Root's
From: Michael D. Berger m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com
I solved the problem with:
yum remove nautilus
But now, when I put a directory in /root/Desktop, it does not
appear on the desktop.
I am now looking for a another file manager -- perhaps the one
used in my older CentOS.
Since you seem to
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:57:50 -0700, John Doe wrote:
[...]
Since you seem to be using Gnome and not KDE, you can google for gnome
hide dekstop icons, and the first answer will tell you how to hide
those system icons (gconf-editor). But first reinstall nautilus.
JD
With the help of:
ps
On my laptop, I have not been able to get KDE to run; I
always get gnome. I installed selecting KDE, and I tried
yum groupinstall, which appeared to work, but I still get
gnome running. BTW, I boot to level 3, and run startx.
Thanks for your suggestions.
Mike.
Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my laptop, I have not been able to get KDE to run; I
always get gnome. I installed selecting KDE, and I tried
yum groupinstall, which appeared to work, but I still get
gnome running. BTW, I boot to level 3, and run startx.
Thanks for your suggestions.
KDE has
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
To: centos@centos.org
From: Michael D. Berger m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com
Subject: [CentOS] Centos 6: howto install and run KDE
On my laptop, I have not been able to get KDE to run; I
always get gnome. I installed selecting KDE, and I tried
yum
On CentOS 6.0 KDE is there a way to change the Panel appearance
(color, pattern, etc.)?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I haven't seen -any- updates to centos 6 since July 10th?!? is 6.1
holding this up?
From the devel mailing list:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-August/008071.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 11:07 +0200, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I haven't seen -any- updates to centos 6 since July 10th?!?is 6.1
holding this up?
From the devel mailing list:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-August/008071.html
Time for upgrading 5.6. I wonder how
To route a subnet in ipv6 there are two possibilities:
- add route commands for the subnet in each computer
- or use neighbor proxy in the router server
I prefer neighbor proxy.
So I have to activate neighbor proxy in the router:
sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.proxy_ndp=1
and I
On 08/18/2011 11:10 AM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
To route a subnet in ipv6 there are two possibilities:
-add route commands for the subnet in each computer
-or use neighbor proxy in the router server
I prefer neighbor proxy.
So I have to activate neighbor proxy in the router:
sysctl -w
I haven't seen -any- updates to centos 6 since July 10th?!?is 6.1
holding this up?
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
What do I need to enable XFS support in CentOS 6? is there a CentOS
Plus kernel yet that enables this ?
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
___
CentOS mailing list
On 08/11/2011 06:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
What do I need to enable XFS support in CentOS 6? is there a CentOS
Plus kernel yet that enables this ?
xfs is available in the stock distro
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:17:50 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 08/11/2011 06:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
What do I need to enable XFS support in CentOS 6? is there a
CentOS
Plus kernel yet that enables this ?
xfs is available in the stock distro
Only for the x86_64 kernel.
Best regards,
On 08/11/11 10:23 AM, Morten Stevens wrote:
xfs is available in the stock distro
Only for the x86_64 kernel.
ah. i needed to install xfsprogs and xfsdump to get mkfs.xfs.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
To: centos@centos.org
From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 6 and XFS
On 08/11/11 10:23 AM, Morten Stevens wrote:
xfs is available in the stock distro
Only for the x86_64 kernel.
ah. i needed to install xfsprogs
From: Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net
I ran a yum update and it installed a new kernel.
but it did not modify the grub.conf file.
Is this the new behavior or...?
Have you moved grub.conf at all - like to a different boot
partition, or changed any symlinks to grub.conf?
I did not move
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, John Doe wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: John Doe jd...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 kernel update and grub.conf...
From: Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net
I ran a yum update and it installed a new kernel.
but it did not modify
I did not move anything; it is a brand new install...
The only thing that might be out of ordinary is that the yum update
is made from a kickstart chrooted post script...
You don't need to do that. Add the updates repo as a 'repo' line
in the ks, it will install anything new at once saving time
From: Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com
You don't need to do that. Add the updates repo as a 'repo' line
in the ks, it will install anything new at once saving time and cruft.
The thing is that I setup the kickstart with the target network
configured (which will not work in our
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, John Doe wrote:
*snip*
I do *everything* in the chrooted post, so that I can just shutdown
after install and the server is ready to be plugged.
It used to work fine with 5.x...
Everything also seems to work fine for 6.x, except for grubby.
I caught a Grubby fatal error :
Whenever there's a kernel update on my system, the new kernel packages are
installed, and the grub.conf file does not get updated. Which is THE WAY I
want it to be. I never did like the way grub.conf got updated behind my
back, so to speak, after a kernel update.
Now I don't need to worry
Hey,
I ran a yum update and it installed a new kernel.
...
Installed:
kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-71.29.1.el6 kernel-devel.x86_64
0:2.6.32-71.29.1.el6
but it did not modify the grub.conf file.
#boot=/dev/sda
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, John Doe wrote:
To: Cent O Smailinglist centos@centos.org
From: John Doe jd...@yahoo.com
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 6 kernel update and grub.conf...
Hey,
I ran a yum update and it installed a new kernel.
...
Installed:
kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-71.29.1.el6 kernel
901 - 1000 of 1751 matches
Mail list logo
