On 26/10/2019 11:07 pm, Fred Smith wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:08:02PM +1100, Bill Maidment wrote:
On 26/10/2019 12:08 pm, David G. Miller wrote:
>The corresponding system-config-printer rpm from Fedora 28 appears to
>work. Not the best solution but a solution.
>
But no longer available
On 10/26/19 6:07 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:08:02PM +1100, Bill Maidment wrote:
On 26/10/2019 12:08 pm, David G. Miller wrote:
The corresponding system-config-printer rpm from Fedora 28 appears to
work. Not the best solution but a solution.
But no longer available that
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:08:02PM +1100, Bill Maidment wrote:
> On 26/10/2019 12:08 pm, David G. Miller wrote:
> >The corresponding system-config-printer rpm from Fedora 28 appears to
> >work. Not the best solution but a solution.
> >
>
> But no longer available that I can find. I presume it mus
On 26/10/2019 12:08 pm, David G. Miller wrote:
The corresponding system-config-printer rpm from Fedora 28 appears to
work. Not the best solution but a solution.
But no longer available that I can find. I presume it must be version
1.5.11-13 to match the -lib version
--
Cheers
Bill
The corresponding system-config-printer rpm from Fedora 28 appears to
work. Not the best solution but a solution.
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/25/19 5:33 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:17:53 +1100
Bill Maidment wrote:
I have also got MATE 1.22.2 running, but I don't have access to Printe
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:17:53 +1100
Bill Maidment wrote:
> I have also got MATE 1.22.2 running, but I don't have access to Printer
> configuration in MATE.
I think it's missing. On Centos 7 that functionality is provided by the
system-config-printer rpm, as seen here:
system-config-printer-1.
On 16/10/2019 9:17 am, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 10/16/19 12:07 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:11:50PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 10/15/19 10:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
This is interesting and promising:
"The official unofficial repository for MATE for E
On 10/21/19 9:41 PM, David G. Miller wrote:
> On 10/21/19 1:00 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> On 10/21/19 6:02 AM, David G. Miller wrote:
>>> On 10/11/19 7:46 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 15:25 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>>
>>> A couple of minor
On 10/21/19 1:00 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 10/21/19 6:02 AM, David G. Miller wrote:
On 10/11/19 7:46 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 15:25 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
As of now, I have a working MATE DM on CentOS 8. It's a hack though,
I
used Fed
>
>
> On 2019-10-18 10:27, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:23:38AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> And last but not least: I got used to some way of interaction with
>>> computer,
>>> and that way is most productive for me after very long use. I don't
>>> want to
>>> blend i
On 10/21/19 6:02 AM, David G. Miller wrote:
> On 10/11/19 7:46 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
>> On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 15:25 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>> As of now, I have a working MATE DM on CentOS 8. It's a hack though,
>>> I
>>> used Fedora repositories. But that means com
On 10/11/19 7:46 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 15:25 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
As of now, I have a working MATE DM on CentOS 8. It's a hack though,
I
used Fedora repositories. But that means compiling MATE in EPEL
should
be straightforward, just recomp
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:34:59PM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> Mutt does work with gmail. Hrrm, I'm looking I see I do have the password
> used in my msmtprc file. If one just uses a very simple muttrc file file,
> it will also work but require the password.
Of course I'm aware that mutt an use
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:36:25AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On 2019-10-18 10:27, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> > It's too bad that Mutt doesn't support GMail's authentication well
> And no, I don't use gmail anything, I know you are a wast majority who don't
> care, so, I'll not explain, and wil
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:48:49PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>
> > to change meaning, I trim in an effort to make it easier for others to read
> > stuff. So if it was me, feel free to chastize me either publicly or
> > privately
>
> I will not: I did receive so many great advises from you,
On 2019-10-18 12:40, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:42:22AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Oct 18, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:36:25AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:23:38AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:42:22AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 18, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:36:25AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:23:38AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> And last bu
> On Oct 18, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:36:25AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:23:38AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
And last but not least: I got used to some way of interaction with
computer,
and t
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:36:25AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:23:38AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> > > And last but not least: I got used to some way of interaction with
> > > computer,
> > > and that way is most productive for me after very long use. I don
On 2019-10-18 10:27, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:23:38AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
And last but not least: I got used to some way of interaction with computer,
and that way is most productive for me after very long use. I don't want to
blend in iPad generation, I wa
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:23:38AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> And last but not least: I got used to some way of interaction with computer,
> and that way is most productive for me after very long use. I don't want to
> blend in iPad generation, I want to stay productive which I am. So, I use
>
On 2019-10-18 09:23, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On 2019-10-18 05:04, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 10/17/19 4:08 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any
update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has bee
On 2019-10-18 05:04, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 10/17/19 4:08 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on the
status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
I would love to jump on C8 and
Le 18/10/2019 à 09:16, Alessandro Baggi a écrit :
Hi Niki,
why you choosed OpenSUSE Leap and not a distro like Fedora or Debian/Ubuntu?
Earlier this year, I wrote a detailed blog article about choosing an OS.
No theory and no speculation, just hands-on personal experience:
https://www.microl
you should give gnome3 some time.
Here is the thing.
At the beginning i disliked gnome3. I tried it for 1 or 2 days and then
i turned to xfce.
I started using gnome3 when one of my friends said that it is usable if
you get use to it. I also considered the fact that desktop environments
like xfce
On 10/17/19 4:08 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on
>> the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
>>
>> I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mat
On 17/10/19 22:24, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
I decided to switch the desktop clients to OpenSUSE Leap KDE
Hi Niki,
why you choosed OpenSUSE Leap and not a distro like Fedora or Debian/Ubuntu?
Best regards.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Is gnome3 really that bad :D
It's better than Microsoft Bob, I suppose.
--
Yves Bellefeuille
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 10/17/19 7:08 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on the
status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate is
ki
Le 17/10/2019 à 16:08, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
Is gnome3 really that bad :D
There's an easy way to figure that out. Our local school has been 100 %
GNU/Linux since 2010 (when we first installed CentOS 5 on desktops and
servers). On the latest count, I have a hundred users there.
Over the ye
On 17/10/2019 15:59, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:28AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>>> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on
>>> the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
>>>
>>> I wo
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 10:59 -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:28AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> > > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any
> > > update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been releas
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:28AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on
> > the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
> >
> > I would love to jump on C8 and start playing wi
On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on
> the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
>
> I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate is
> kind of a showstopper for me at the mo
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:17:17AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 10/16/19 12:07 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:11:50PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> >> On 10/15/19 10:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> >>> This is interesting and promising:
> >>>
> >>> "The off
On 10/16/19 12:07 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:11:50PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> On 10/15/19 10:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>> This is interesting and promising:
>>>
>>> "The official unofficial repository for MATE for EL8.":
>>> https://copr.fedorainfracloud
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:11:50PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 10/15/19 10:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> > This is interesting and promising:
> >
> > "The official unofficial repository for MATE for EL8.":
> > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/neonman/MATE/
>
> The previous
On 10/15/19 10:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> This is interesting and promising:
>
> "The official unofficial repository for MATE for EL8.":
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/neonman/MATE/
The previous link is forked repo (I do not know why) and here is
original repo:
https://copr.fe
This is interesting and promising:
"The official unofficial repository for MATE for EL8.":
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/neonman/MATE/
On 9/26/19 8:02 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 9/26/19 2:00 AM, Earl Ramirez wrote:
>>>
>>> If you want it ... package and build it when building
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 15:25 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> As of now, I have a working MATE DM on CentOS 8. It's a hack though,
> I
> used Fedora repositories. But that means compiling MATE in EPEL
> should
> be straightforward, just recompile Fedora 28 packages.
>
>
> I used Fedora 28 re
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 15:25 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 9/24/19 10:55 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 15:41, Frank Cox
> > wrote:
> > > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any
> > > update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has b
On 9/30/19 8:01 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 08:02 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>> I managed to install F28 MATE packages to CentOS 8, so all is needed
>> is
>> to recompile those in EPEL.
>
> I too am a solid fan of MATE. F28 had v1.16. F30 has the l
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 08:02 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> I managed to install F28 MATE packages to CentOS 8, so all is needed
> is
> to recompile those in EPEL.
I too am a solid fan of MATE. F28 had v1.16. F30 has the latest v1.22.
Is there any reason I should not try the latest? Perhaps
Le 25/09/2019 à 00:24, Valeri Galtsev a écrit :
> I tried SUSE around ver 7. Memory leak in code run as unpiveleged user
> was consistently crashing stock SUSE installation. Whereas downloaded
> and build kernel from kernel.org (with all default options) on the same
> SAUSE box successfully killed
On 9/26/19 2:00 AM, Earl Ramirez wrote:
>>
>> If you want it ... package and build it when building on 8 becomes
>> available via CBS to SIGs. Should be early next week.
> With the new initiative CentOS and Fedora Stream, wouldn't it be easier
> collaborate with Fedora SIGs to bring an updated ver
On 9/25/19 1:46 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Robert Nichols said:
the lack of VM snapshot capability is a total deal-breaker for me.
The capability is still there and works just the same as before. The
only change is that the new preferred tool for graphical VM management,
Cockpi
>
> If you want it ... package and build it when building on 8 becomes
> available via CBS to SIGs. Should be early next week.
With the new initiative CentOS and Fedora Stream, wouldn't it be easier
collaborate with Fedora SIGs to bring an updated version of Mate to
CentOS
> and build whatever y
Once upon a time, Chris Adams said:
> Once upon a time, Robert Nichols said:
> > the lack of VM snapshot capability is a total deal-breaker for me.
>
> The capability is still there and works just the same as before. The
> only change is that the new preferred tool for graphical VM management,
Once upon a time, Robert Nichols said:
> the lack of VM snapshot capability is a total deal-breaker for me.
The capability is still there and works just the same as before. The
only change is that the new preferred tool for graphical VM management,
Cockpit, doesn't yet support making snapshots.
On 9/25/19 7:30 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
>> I am guessing that because CentOS releases only every 3-5 years,
>> people forget how much work is done at the beginning of every release.
>> First there is a lack of packages available. Then there is the
>> complaining that the OS is useless because it d
On 2019-09-25 10:12, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 25/09/2019 03:12, Fred Smith wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:54:34PM +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep, 2019 at 14:48:57 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:27:07 +0100
Liam O'Toole wrote:
If the availability of a particular
On 25/09/2019 03:12, Fred Smith wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:54:34PM +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep, 2019 at 14:48:57 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:27:07 +0100
Liam O'Toole wrote:
If the availability of a particular desktop environment is a
showstopper, then p
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 08:22:39AM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:04:01PM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> > I might end up switching to Mint.
>
> I'm not sure that's a huge threat to CentOS, they're quite different.
>
> CentOS 7 really only supported GNOME3, largely b
On 9/24/19 10:55 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 15:41, Frank Cox wrote:
>>
>> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on
>> the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
>>
>> I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it
> I am guessing that because CentOS releases only every 3-5 years,
> people forget how much work is done at the beginning of every release.
> First there is a lack of packages available. Then there is the
> complaining that the OS is useless because it doesn't have ABC. Then
> there is finding th
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:04:01PM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> I might end up switching to Mint.
I'm not sure that's a huge threat to CentOS, they're quite different.
CentOS 7 really only supported GNOME3, largely because Red Hat is so
involved in GNOME development. MATE support on CentOS 7 s
On 9/25/19 12:22 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 25/09/2019 à 08:18, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit :
>> Why do you need "every major and minor desktop environment under the
>> sun"? I run CentOS desktops/laptops since 5.3 and even rebuilt 70+
>> packages for it, even Skype rpm.
>>
>> All I need for
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 17:09, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 16:55:19 -0400
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > Nothing has changed since the September 16 answer I gave:
> >
> > This is more of a question for the EPEL lists versus here. The current
> > status is that desktops are harder
Hello,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:33:53 +0200 Rainer Traut wrote:
> Am 25.09.19 um 08:18 schrieb Ljubomir Ljubojevic:
> > All I need for work that feeds me is one good work environment and that
> > is MATE. All tray icons are visible so I can see if message or mail
> > comes without need to move mo
Le 25/09/2019 à 08:18, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit :
> Why do you need "every major and minor desktop environment under the
> sun"? I run CentOS desktops/laptops since 5.3 and even rebuilt 70+
> packages for it, even Skype rpm.
>
> All I need for work that feeds me is one good work environment a
Am 25.09.19 um 08:18 schrieb Ljubomir Ljubojevic:
All I need for work that feeds me is one good work environment and that
is MATE. All tray icons are visible so I can see if message or mail
comes without need to move more then eyeball. And stablity of CentOS
makes it best option even though ver
On 24/09/2019 21:55, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 15:41, Frank Cox wrote:
>> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on
>> the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
>>
>> I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, b
On 9/25/19 12:06 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> But on the desktop, I've switched to OpenSUSE Leap, and I'm a happy
> camper now. I can highly recommend it. Sports every major and minor
> desktop environment under the sun, and it's a nice blend of semi-rolling
> releases based on a rock-solid SLES bas
On 9/24/19 9:12 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
OTOH, if I was forced to use Gnome, I may well go shoot myself.
I was thinking I might as well go back to Windows, but that's pretty much the
same thing.
Right now I'm rather dismayed by RHEL/CentOS 8. I was hoping to skip CentOS 7
and go straight from
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:54:34PM +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep, 2019 at 14:48:57 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:27:07 +0100
> > Liam O'Toole wrote:
> >
> > > If the availability of a particular desktop environment is a
> > > showstopper, then perhaps RHEL and Ce
On Tue, 24 Sep, 2019 at 18:08:08 -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 02:48:57PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:27:07 +0100
> > Liam O'Toole wrote:
> >
> > > If the availability of a particular desktop environment is a
> > > showstopper, then perhaps RHEL and Cent
On Tue, 24 Sep, 2019 at 14:48:57 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:27:07 +0100
> Liam O'Toole wrote:
>
> > If the availability of a particular desktop environment is a
> > showstopper, then perhaps RHEL and CentOS are not the best choice for
> > you.
>
> That may be, but in view of
On 2019-09-24 17:06, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Le 24/09/2019 à 23:09, Frank Cox a écrit :
Perhaps now that more people have their hands on Centos 8 and can
work with it the folks who know what they're doing for getting
desktops running on EL8 (and I'm definitely not one of them) will be
able to ma
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 02:48:57PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:27:07 +0100
> Liam O'Toole wrote:
>
> > If the availability of a particular desktop environment is a
> > showstopper, then perhaps RHEL and CentOS are not the best choice for
> > you.
>
> That may be, but in view
Le 24/09/2019 à 23:09, Frank Cox a écrit :
> Perhaps now that more people have their hands on Centos 8 and can
> work with it the folks who know what they're doing for getting
> desktops running on EL8 (and I'm definitely not one of them) will be
> able to make further progress.
For what it's wort
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 16:55:19 -0400
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Nothing has changed since the September 16 answer I gave:
>
> This is more of a question for the EPEL lists versus here. The current
> status is that desktops are harder to package up in EL8 and only a
> less feature version is avai
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 15:41, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on
> the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
>
> I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate is
> kind of a showstopper for
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:27:07 +0100
Liam O'Toole wrote:
> If the availability of a particular desktop environment is a
> showstopper, then perhaps RHEL and CentOS are not the best choice for
> you.
That may be, but in view of the fact that you can even get a version of CDE
that works (very well)
On Tue, 24 Sep, 2019 at 16:29:41 -0400, mark wrote:
> Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Sep, 2019 at 13:41:08 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> >
> >> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any
> >> update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
> >>
> >> I would
Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep, 2019 at 13:41:08 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>
>> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any
>> update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
>>
>> I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of
>> M
On Tue, 24 Sep, 2019 at 13:41:08 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on
> the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
>
> I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate is
> kind of a showstop
Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on the
status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released?
I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate is
kind of a showstopper for me at the moment.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital
77 matches
Mail list logo
