Re: [CentOS] centosplus version of firefox

> Am 09.02.2017 um 16:10 schrieb Johnny Hughes : > > On 02/04/2017 06:55 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus >> version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. >> > > The CentOS Plus version of Firefox was released because of t

Re: [CentOS] centosplus version of firefox

On 02/04/2017 06:55 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus > version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. > The CentOS Plus version of Firefox was released because of the decision upstream to disable ffmpeg. The newest upstream

Re: [CentOS] centosplus version of firefox

> Am 04.02.2017 um 13:55 schrieb Leon Fauster : > > I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus > version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. > OK, I see. The ffmpeg support is reenabled now (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330898). This makes

Re: [CentOS] centosplus version of firefox

On 02/04/2017 04:55 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. Thanks for the effort! LF I rebuild the Fedora Rawhide version of FireFox with a few tweaks to the spec file (needed to get

[CentOS] centosplus version of firefox

I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. Thanks for the effort! LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentosPlus

James B. Byrne wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 07:39, Mauricio Tavares wrote: >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:32 AM, James Hogarth >> wrote: >>> On 17 May 2016 20:52, "Mauricio Tavares" >>> wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, wrote: > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: >> Has

Re: [CentOS] CentosPlus

On Wed, May 18, 2016 07:39, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:32 AM, James Hogarth > wrote: >> On 17 May 2016 20:52, "Mauricio Tavares" >> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, wrote: >>> > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: >>> >> Has anybody enabled this repo? >>>

Re: [CentOS] CentosPlus

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 17 May 2016 20:52, "Mauricio Tavares" wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, wrote: >> > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: >> >> Has anybody enabled this repo? >> >> I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades >

Re: [CentOS] CentosPlus

On 17 May 2016 20:52, "Mauricio Tavares" wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, wrote: > > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: > >> Has anybody enabled this repo? > >> I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades > >> as the dependencies are rather different. > > > > I've had

Re: [CentOS] CentosPlus

On 2016-05-17 15:51, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > Why not leave all the extra repos disabled, say > > sed -i -e 's/^enabled=1/enabled=0/' /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo > > and manually enable it when you need to get a package from said repo: > > yum install -y libmcrypt --enablerepo=epel Hello

Re: [CentOS] CentosPlus

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, wrote: > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: >> Has anybody enabled this repo? >> I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades >> as the dependencies are rather different. > > I've had the CentOSPlus repository enabled for CentOS6 for more > than a

Re: [CentOS] CentosPlus

On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: > Has anybody enabled this repo? > I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades > as the dependencies are rather different. I've had the CentOSPlus repository enabled for CentOS6 for more than a year with no problems. I don't recall reading anythi

[CentOS] CentosPlus

Has anybody enabled this repo? I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades as the dependencies are rather different. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel-debug

On 05/07/2014 11:48 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > >> I am setting up crashkernel and was wondering where I get the kernel-debug >> rpm >> for centosplus kernels. > The kernel-debug package has never been built for the centosplus > kernel as far as I

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel-debug

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > I am setting up crashkernel and was wondering where I get the kernel-debug rpm > for centosplus kernels. The kernel-debug package has never been built for the centosplus kernel as far as I know. It requires its own config file. I suggest you u

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel-debug

On 05/07/2014 09:51 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 07.05.2014 um 15:24 schrieb Steve Clark : >> I am setting up crashkernel and was wondering where I get the kernel-debug >> rpm >> for centosplus kernels. > > http://debuginfo.centos.org/ > > -- > LF > ___

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel-debug

Am 07.05.2014 um 15:24 schrieb Steve Clark : > I am setting up crashkernel and was wondering where I get the kernel-debug rpm > for centosplus kernels. http://debuginfo.centos.org/ -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org

[CentOS] centosplus kernel-debug

Hi, I am setting up crashkernel and was wondering where I get the kernel-debug rpm for centosplus kernels. Thanks, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com __

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus src rpm

On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 03:17:32 PM cent...@iotti.biz wrote: > I'm looking for latest centosplus kernel source rpm , which should be > kernel-2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.centos.plus.src.rpm to date. > Maybe someone could provide a link to it? Hmm, shouldn't it be: http://vault.centos.org/6.2/centosp

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus src rpm

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:17 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for latest centosplus kernel source rpm , which should be > kernel-2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.centos.plus.src.rpm to date. > Maybe someone could provide a link to it? I'm afraid it's been forgotten. :( I was told it would be pushed short

[CentOS] Centosplus src rpm

Hi all, I'm looking for latest centosplus kernel source rpm , which should be kernel-2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.centos.plus.src.rpm to date. Maybe someone could provide a link to it? Thank you Luigi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > If you enable the kernel from the CentOSPlus repo, you should *disable* > kernel updates from the standard repo, otherwise yum will get updates > from *both* places.  By disabling the kernel packages from being updated > from the standard re

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

At Sat, 16 Apr 2011 19:37:24 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > >>> Because they survive kernel updates transparently and you can run the > >>> distro kernel, there will be no "waiting" for each kernel update. > >> That is indeed what I need, I use ieee1394, raw1394 and sbp2 to access > >> my

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On 4/16/11 6:37 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: Because they survive kernel updates transparently and you can run the distro kernel, there will be no "waiting" for each kernel update. >>> That is indeed what I need, I use ieee1394, raw1394 and sbp2 to access >>> my 2tb firewire external drive tha

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

>>> Because they survive kernel updates transparently and you can run the >>> distro kernel, there will be no "waiting" for each kernel update. >> That is indeed what I need, I use ieee1394, raw1394 and sbp2 to access >> my 2tb firewire external drive that is used for backup rotation. >> >> I will

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: >> http://elrepo.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=kmod-ieee1394 >> >> It provides: >> >> dv1394.ko >> eth1394.ko >> ieee1394.ko >> ohci1394.ko >> pcilynx.ko >> raw1394.ko >> sbp2.ko >> video1394.ko >> >> Because they survive kernel updates transpa

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On 4/16/11 2:25 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: > >> If it is the classic stack of firewire drivers that are required, and >> there is nothing else needed from the centosplus kernel, a good >> solution is to get the kABI-tracking firewire modules from ELRepo: >> >> http://elrepo.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?pag

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

> If it is the classic stack of firewire drivers that are required, and > there is nothing else needed from the centosplus kernel, a good > solution is to get the kABI-tracking firewire modules from ELRepo: > > http://elrepo.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=kmod-ieee1394 > > It provides: > > dv1394.ko

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/16/11 12:50 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: >> Is it possible that the kernel in the centosplus repo is not up to date ? >> >> The centosplus kernel I have is kernel-PAE-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 and the >> regular one is 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5... >> >> I

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On 4/16/11 12:50 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: > Is it possible that the kernel in the centosplus repo is not up to date ? > > The centosplus kernel I have is kernel-PAE-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 and the > regular one is 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5... > > I need the plus because of the firewire drivers. I thought that

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

Nicolas Ross wrote on 04/16/2011 02:25 PM: > It's not that urgent, it's just that yum sees that the update from the > regular repository, and I ended up with no external drive to my backup > storage server and it took a while to figure it out... You might want to add an "exclude=kernel*" in [upda

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

> I *believe* it's been already built. But it needs to be released. > Karanbir is away this weekend. Can other dev push it? Johnny? Tru? > > Akemi It's not that urgent, it's just that yum sees that the update from the regular repository, and I ended up with no external drive to my backup storage

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote: > Is it possible that the kernel in the centosplus repo is not up to date ? > > The centosplus kernel I have is kernel-PAE-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 and the > regular one is 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5... > > I need the plus because of the firewire drivers. I

[CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

Is it possible that the kernel in the centosplus repo is not up to date ? The centosplus kernel I have is kernel-PAE-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 and the regular one is 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5... I need the plus because of the firewire drivers. Regards, ___ CentOS m

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> By the way, has this been accepted in the mainline kernel? > The patches are in 2.6.38.2 just downloaded from kernel.org. Indeed. Just found it here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/st

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :) Akemi HOORAY - it works. I got an ipv6 address: $ ip6 a s eth2 4: eth2: mtu 1500 qle

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :) > > Akemi > > HOORAY - it works. > > I got an ipv6 address: > $ ip6 a s eth2 > 4: eth2: mtu 1500 qlen 1000 >     inet6 2001:db8

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011 11:36 files let me try the kernel-2.6.32-71.24.1.

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the > > kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011 > 11:36 > > files let me try the > > kernel-2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1.i686.rpm

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 01:08 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in 0004586 (thanks). I am pleased to report th

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > > On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in > 0004586 (thanks). I am pleased  to report > that they appear to work as adverti

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. I

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. I got a kernel built with the patches using t

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they > will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. > I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in > 0004586

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/08/2011 11:35 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing. Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they will be a worthy addition to t

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing. > > Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they > will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. > I got a kernel

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: I had a quick look at the patches. The first one seems to be applicable without any modifications. The second one will need an adjustment. Akemi I just finish

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:56:24 +0200 Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Rob Kampen wrote: > > Tom Bishop wrote: > >> This is excellent information Akemi, provides opportunities for > >> folks to dig in and specific information that is needed and where > >> to go to learn more...Thanks! :) > >> > >> On Th

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > I had a quick look at the patches. The first one seems to be > applicable without any modifications. The second one will need an > adjustment. > Akemi > > I just finished building a kernel based on

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

Rob Kampen wrote: > Tom Bishop wrote: >> This is excellent information Akemi, provides opportunities for folks >> to dig in and specific information that is needed and where to go to >> learn more...Thanks! :) >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Akemi Yagi > > wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 12:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4586 Point 2 (note 12051) is the one that is relevant. I welcome any feedback / suggestions for the proposed method I outli

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

Tom Bishop wrote: This is excellent information Akemi, provides opportunities for folks to dig in and specific information that is needed and where to go to learn more...Thanks! :) On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Akemi Yagi > wrote: Changing the subject line for

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/07/2011 12:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4586 > > Point 2 (note 12051) is the one that is relevant. I welcome any > feedback / suggestions for the proposed method I outlined there. > While you are there, l

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/07/2011 12:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Changing the subject line for good ... On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:23:51 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote: AIUI: In previous releases, RH distributed source + patches. Starting 6.0 RH releases patched so

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

This is excellent information Akemi, provides opportunities for folks to dig in and specific information that is needed and where to go to learn more...Thanks! :) On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > Changing the subject line for good ... > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Lamar

[CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

Changing the subject line for good ... On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:23:51 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> AIUI: In previous releases, RH distributed source + patches.  Starting >> 6.0 RH releases patched source.  This makes backing out a patch,

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus vmware kernels....???

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 05:19:44PM -0500, Tom Bishop wrote: > Thanks Tru and Johnny, one more question. Can I just use the > centos5-testing repo, ie, yum enablerepoxxx install kernel-vm? I ask > because I tried and while it worked it loaded an older kernel. Should I > just go to tru's directory

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus vmware kernels....???

Thanks Tru and Johnny, one more question. Can I just use the centos5-testing repo, ie, yum enablerepoxxx install kernel-vm? I ask because I tried and while it worked it loaded an older kernel. Should I just go to tru's directory and install the RPM directly? Also, ok more than one question, are

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus vmware kernels....???

Ruslan Sivak wrote: Thanks to Tru, kernel-vm is all up-to-date and you can find it here: http://people.centos.org/tru/kernel-vm/ and yes, using the clocksource=pit option should not be an issue with these kernels. Akemi So if I understand this correctly, one should not be using a stoc

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus vmware kernels....???

Thanks much, I have in the past compiled my own but thought I would check. A big THANKS to whoever provides them... On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, so I need to bring up a new v

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus vmware kernels....???

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm >>> kernels for centos. I have read this >>> htt

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus vmware kernels....???

Akemi Yagi wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm kernels for centos. I have read this http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189 about the tick divider but it wasn't clear what the b

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus vmware kernels....???

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm > kernels for centos. I have read this http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189 > about the tick divider but it wasn't clear what the best step forward i

[CentOS] Centosplus vmware kernels....???

OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm kernels for centos. I have read this http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189about the tick divider but it wasn't clear what the best step forward is for centos 5.1 was, i usually ran with the clocksource=pit option and it loo

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

On May 11, 2008, at 9:06, Akemi Yagi wrote The centosplus kernel update that just came out (2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.centos.plus) does have vesafb support enabled. Thank you, Johnny, for the work. :-) It finally trickled down to my mirror, and a quick install this morning shows that is indeed fixe

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

2008/4/19 Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Akemi Yagi wrote: > > I normally only release kernels for CentOS Plus with the same numbers and at > the same times as the upstream kernels. > > Since I did screw this up, I will release a new version as soon as I can > after the current set of updates

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Apr 17, 2008, at 14:02, Akemi Yagi wrote: Any chance this will happen before next Wednesday? That's when I'm planning to start my upgrades... I doubt it, but you never know because this is up t

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 17, 2008, at 14:02, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > > Any chance this will happen before next Wednesday? That's when I'm > > > planning to start my upgrades... > > > > I doubt it, but you never know because this is up t

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

On Apr 17, 2008, at 14:02, Akemi Yagi wrote: Any chance this will happen before next Wednesday? That's when I'm planning to start my upgrades... I doubt it, but you never know because this is up to our upstream vendor. I was thinking about a new centosplus kernel before next week -- is

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 17, 2008, at 10:34, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > If you have your own mirror, the easiest way would be to get those > > bz32 kernels in your repo. Johnny Hughes or other CentOS devs > > need to chime in here abou

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

On Apr 17, 2008, at 10:34, Akemi Yagi wrote: If you have your own mirror, the easiest way would be to get those bz32 kernels in your repo. Johnny Hughes or other CentOS devs need to chime in here about the plan for those kernels, but my (wild) guess is that those kernels stay there until th

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 16, 2008, at 19:21, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > You have another choice here if you would rather not wait for the next > > update of the centosplus kernel. The standard kernel with the same > > NFS bug fix is availab

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

On Apr 16, 2008, at 19:21, Akemi Yagi wrote: You have another choice here if you would rather not wait for the next update of the centosplus kernel. The standard kernel with the same NFS bug fix is available from: http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/kernel/5/ I have just checked the kernels in

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm still using CentOS 4.6, but have been planning an upgrade to CentOS 5 > for quite a while. One of the things that was holding me back is that the > CentOS 5.0 kernel did not have the framebuffer support enabled by d

[CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

I'm still using CentOS 4.6, but have been planning an upgrade to CentOS 5 for quite a while. One of the things that was holding me back is that the CentOS 5.0 kernel did not have the framebuffer support enabled by default. So I waited for CentOS 5.1. However, on one of my test systems I

Re: [CentOS] centosplus + priority plugin

That should mostly work ... the only problem is that there might be some perl* things in centosplus that might not SPECIFICALLY be part of the new web stack and they will also be taken from the plus repo. It should not make a huge difference though. Actually, it did not work. I had to remo

Re: [CentOS] centosplus + priority plugin

5.0.54-1.el4.centoscentosplus mysql-devel.x86_64 5.0.54-1.el4.centoscentosplus mysql-server.x86_64 5.0.54-1.el4.centoscentosplus mysqlclient10.x86_64 3.23.58-9.2.c4 centosplus perl.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] centosplus + priority plugin

.el4. centosplus httpd-manual.x86_64 2.0.59-1.el4s1.10.el4. centosplus mod_perl.x86_64 2.0.3-1.el4s1.3centosplus mod_ssl.x86_64 1:2.0.59-1.el4s1.10.el centosplus mysql.x86_64 5.0.54-1.el4.cent

[CentOS] centosplus + priority plugin

2.0.59-1.el4s1.10.el4. centosplus httpd-manual.x86_64 2.0.59-1.el4s1.10.el4. centosplus mod_perl.x86_64 2.0.3-1.el4s1.3centosplus mod_ssl.x86_64 1:2.0.59-1.el4s1.10.el centosplus mysql.x86_64

[CentOS] centosplus kernel question

I noticed a new upstream kernel was released yesterday and now wondered how long until the corresponding version of the centosplus kernels are updated? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0705.html -- Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the sma

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus Perl Upgrade

Nick Webb wrote: > Hey All, > > I'm trying to upgrade to perl 5.8.8 via CentOSPlus, but am having no > luck. Here is what I have done. > > # yum list | grep perl > . . . > perl.i3863:5.8.5-12.1 installed > . . . > > Created /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Bas

[CentOS] CentOSPlus Perl Upgrade

Hey All, I'm trying to upgrade to perl 5.8.8 via CentOSPlus, but am having no luck. Here is what I have done. # yum list | grep perl . . . perl.i3863:5.8.5-12.1 installed . . . Created /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo with: #additional packages that

Re: [CentOS] centosplus repo updates

Dave wrote: > Hello, >First of all thanks to the poster on the wiki for centosplus. I've > configed it added include and exclude lines, do i need the > centos-priority plugin? I want to enable centosplus to use the > centosplus kernel and the centosplus webstack. Below are my base, > updates, a

[CentOS] centosplus repo updates

Hello, First of all thanks to the poster on the wiki for centosplus. I've configed it added include and exclude lines, do i need the centos-priority plugin? I want to enable centosplus to use the centosplus kernel and the centosplus webstack. Below are my base, updates, and centosplus repo

Re: [CentOS] CentOSplus Postfix with mysql/pgsql

Le Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:43:19 +0200 Martin Hamant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait: > > On another system: > # yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=centosplus list all | grep postfix > postfix.i386 2:2.1.5-4.2.RHEL4.MYSQ > installed postfix-pflogsumm.i386 > 2:2.2.10-1.RHEL4.2.my

Re: [CentOS] CentOSplus Postfix with mysql/pgsql

Le Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:07:55 +0200 Martin Hamant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait: > Le Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:14:08 -0500 (CDT) > "Brent DiNicola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait: > > > For those curious, since the devs haven't given an answer yet to the > > future of the Postfix with MySQL in CentOS Plus

Re: [CentOS] CentOSplus Postfix with mysql/pgsql

Le Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:14:08 -0500 (CDT) "Brent DiNicola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait: > For those curious, since the devs haven't given an answer yet to the > future of the Postfix with MySQL in CentOS Plus, here is the patch to > add the MySQL support back into Postfix that I used in case anyon

Re: [CentOS] CentOSplus Postfix with mysql/pgsql

2007 08:18:31 -0500 (CDT) > From: "Brent DiNicola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [CentOS] CentOSplus Postfix with mysql/pgsql > To: centos@centos.org > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > The lasted version of Postf

[CentOS] CentOSplus Postfix with mysql/pgsql

The lasted version of Postfix in the OS for 4.5 add a .1 to the rpm version which makes it newer than the CentOSPlus version and hence replaces it, any intent to update the 4.5 CentOSPlus package or should I roll my own with mysql included? 4.5 OS Version: postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.i386.rpm 4.4/5 Cen