Re: [CentOS] Compile on Centos7, run on 6 possible?

2014-07-24 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jonathan Billings billi...@negate.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:16:39PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: I'm getting errors: '/lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found' and

[CentOS] Compile on Centos7, run on 6 possible?

2014-07-21 Thread Les Mikesell
I'm getting errors: '/lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found' and '/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found'. Is there a way to make a backward-compatible binary? If not, is there a sane way to build something that needs gcc 4.8+/boost 1.5.3+/cmake 2.8 on Centos6?

Re: [CentOS] Compile on Centos7, run on 6 possible?

2014-07-21 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:16:39PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: I'm getting errors: '/lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found' and '/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found'. Is there a way to make a backward-compatible binary? If not, is there a sane way to

Re: [CentOS] Compile on Centos7, run on 6 possible?

2014-07-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jonathan Billings billi...@negate.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:16:39PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: I'm getting errors: '/lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found' and '/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found'. Is there a