Somebody oughta try an external USB WiFi dongle on a laptop with internal
WiFi. Does NetworkManager handle two WiFi devices?
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Rob Townley wrote:
> Find some businesses that both have open wifi near each other. Bring an
> old WiFi router and a Cat5 cable. Conne
Find some businesses that both have open wifi near each other. Bring an
old WiFi router and a Cat5 cable. Connect your laptop WiFi to one open
hotspot. Connect the old WiFi router in client access mode to another open
wifi. One "ISP" is to your local coffee shop. The other "ISP" is to the
gro
Any neighbors with Open WiFi?
Connect Cat5 to laptop in your house and connect to neighbors open WiFi.
Woila, two ISPs.
If you have 3G, it will work better to connect it into a CradlePoint type
3G hardware gateway device and connect the laptop to the 3G Gateway.
NetworkManager would only activate
On 05/04/2013 03:37 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> I think I know what I did wrong, but it's going to be a while before I
> can test it. (Dang, I wish I had enough spare hardware at home to set
> up a test lab.)
You can set up VM's and create several virtual interfaces. So you use
one virtualNIC (vNI
On 05/03/2013 06:05 PM, Rob Townley wrote:
> Michael, very frustrating that so much noise for a very simple request. I
> set up multi source routing in 5.3 or so and was astounded at all the
> negativity on this list and that it could not be done. It will take
> forever to read the noise in this
On 05/03/2013 05:06 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 08:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
>
> Alternate source routing, firewall and netfilter marking of packets:
>
>
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s 172.24.5.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 100 #
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s
Michael, very frustrating that so much noise for a very simple request. I
set up multi source routing in 5.3 or so and was astounded at all the
negativity on this list and that it could not be done. It will take
forever to read the noise in this thread alone. Some said you have to use
DHCP i
On 05/03/2013 03:24 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 17:52 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
>
>> Curiously, at least one guy has reported success:
>
>> http://sysadminsjourney.com/content/2009/04/15/doing-simple-source-policy-routing-centos/
>
>> Now, the only thing diffe
On 05/02/2013 08:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 02:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> with its default gateway pointing toward the ISP handling it. DNS
service is simple enough to have standalone servers for each instance
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 17:52 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
> On 05/01/2013 05:15 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:05 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
> >> I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers
> >> can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream
On 05/02/2013 02:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
with its default gateway pointing toward the ISP handling it. DNS
>>> service is simple enough to have standalone servers for each instance
>>> you need.
>>
>> This would also require either re
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> with its default gateway pointing toward the ISP handling it. DNS
>> service is simple enough to have standalone servers for each instance
>> you need.
>
> This would also require either resources or underlying authorizations I
> don't have
On 05/02/2013 01:05 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Michael Mol
> wrote:
>>
>> Ultimately, for this to work cleanly, anything which requires a
>> public IP (be it a raw authoritative DNS server or a load balancer)
>> will require an IP on both public subnets.
>
> No i
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> Ultimately, for this to work cleanly, anything which requires a public
> IP (be it a raw authoritative DNS server or a load balancer) will
> require an IP on both public subnets.
No it doesn't, as long as you don't mind losing the source IP f
On 05/02/2013 05:13 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I've gone that deep. And a tad deeper. I had almost *everything*
>> working by hand, and went to figure out how to convert it to idomatic
>> CentOS network configuration scripts. And took my network down *three
>> times* because of the script
On 05/02/2013 01:01 AM, anax wrote:
> On 2013-05-01 22:05, Michael Mol wrote:
>> I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers
>> can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream providers.
>>
>> A rough diagram of the network layout:
>>
>>
>> ISP1 router (blackbox, rou
On 05/02/2013 08:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>
>> Intent is to maintain the old, slow (but has an SLA) connection as a
>> fallback, and migrate services to the new connection piecemeal.
>> Meanwhile, the same DNS server on the new connection can
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> Intent is to maintain the old, slow (but has an SLA) connection as a
> fallback, and migrate services to the new connection piecemeal.
> Meanwhile, the same DNS server on the new connection can be, e.g. "ns3".
> The same mailserver can have a
>
> Yeah, I've gone that deep. And a tad deeper. I had almost *everything*
> working by hand, and went to figure out how to convert it to idomatic
> CentOS network configuration scripts. And took my network down *three
> times* because of the script-processing stripping things out.
>
>
The files to
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7291
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
might probably help you
suomi
On 2013-05-01 22:05, Michael Mol wrote:
> I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers
> can exist on multiple subnets from mult
On 05/01/2013 05:15 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:05 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
>> I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers
>> can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream providers.
>
> Kinda curious why you are attempting this with
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:05 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
> I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers
> can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream providers.
Kinda curious why you are attempting this without getting involved in
dynamic routing (BGP)... It's usua
I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers
can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream providers.
A rough diagram of the network layout:
ISP1 router (blackbox, routes subnet A, address on subnet A)
\
---eth0(firewall)eth1---((servers))
/
ISP2 r
23 matches
Mail list logo
