On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Michael Simpson
wrote:
>> There is a 64 bit flashplayer now that seems to work fine on 5.x and
>> 6.x. This is an old link so not sure if it's still good.
>>
>> http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10_square.html
>>
> Sorry for continuing the OT but i don't
> There is a 64 bit flashplayer now that seems to work fine on 5.x and
> 6.x. This is an old link so not sure if it's still good.
>
> http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10_square.html
>
Sorry for continuing the OT but i don't want some poor sod finding the
above in google
The "10square" pl
On 15/09/11 10:02, John Doe wrote:
> What about using multilib_policy=best instead?
>
> JD
This is what I do as well and it's worked well on many different
machines now. i386/i686 packages are not automatically pulled in
anymore, it automatically selects the right arch (x86_64).
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 11:01 +0100, Michael Simpson wrote:
> On 15 September 2011 19:58, James Nguyen wrote
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:02 AM, John Doe wrote:
> >>
> >> From: James Nguyen
> >>
> >> > So the premise for this question is that I setup an
> >> > exclude=*.i368,*.i686 in my yum.conf
On 15 September 2011 19:58, James Nguyen wrote
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:02 AM, John Doe wrote:
>>
>> From: James Nguyen
>>
>> > So the premise for this question is that I setup an
>> > exclude=*.i368,*.i686 in my yum.conf.
>> > While doing a yum update I come across missing package dependenci
I haven't seen this option before. Let me do some googling and see if it
fits into the solution I'm looking for.
Thanks =)
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:02 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: James Nguyen
>
> > So the premise for this question is that I setup an exclude=*.i368,*.i686
> in my yum.conf.
>
From: James Nguyen
> So the premise for this question is that I setup an exclude=*.i368,*.i686 in
> my yum.conf.
> While doing a yum update I come across missing package dependencies for
> instance mkinitrd for the i386 package.
What about using multilib_policy=best instead?
JD
_
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Christopher Hawker wrote:
> I could not see any issues with it. As you probably know i386 packages will
> work on an x86_64 install, and there are some packages written for i386 that
> you can't get for x86_64. You could disable it, but my system runs perfect
> wit
I could not see any issues with it. As you probably know i386 packages will
work on an x86_64 install, and there are some packages written for i386 that
you can't get for x86_64. You could disable it, but my system runs perfect
with it.
--
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call
Can anybody give me a reason why this would be a bad idea. So the premise
for this question is that I setup an exclude=*.i368,*.i686 in my yum.conf.
While doing a yum update I come across missing package dependencies for
instance mkinitrd for the i386 package. I noticed there is already one for
10 matches
Mail list logo
