Re: [CentOS] "Continious Repo" vs. 'normal' Centos-Base/Updates questions

2011-09-08 Thread WBEL-User03
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 William Hooper wrote: === > As the > announcement states, when CentOS 5.7 is released, the CR repo will be > emptied, because all those packages will be part of CentOS 5.7. === According to the September 7th tweet on Karanbir's Twitter page[1], Cen

Re: [CentOS] "Continious Repo" vs. 'normal' Centos-Base/Updates questions

2011-09-06 Thread William Hooper
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > At Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:07:03 -0400 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Robert Heller wrote: >> > I have some questions about the "Continious Repo". >> > >> > Does the "Continious Repo" replace the Centos-Base

Re: [CentOS] "Continious Repo" vs. 'normal' Centos-Base/Updates questions

2011-09-06 Thread Robert Heller
At Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:07:03 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > > I have some questions about the "Continious Repo". > > > > Does the "Continious Repo" replace the Centos-Base/Updates repo? > > No. See > http://lists.centos.org/pipermai

Re: [CentOS] "Continious Repo" vs. 'normal' Centos-Base/Updates questions

2011-09-06 Thread William Hooper
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > I have some questions about the "Continious Repo". > > Does the "Continious Repo" replace the Centos-Base/Updates repo? No. See http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-August/017689.html . The CR repo is just a way to get fa

[CentOS] "Continious Repo" vs. 'normal' Centos-Base/Updates questions

2011-09-06 Thread Robert Heller
I have some questions about the "Continious Repo". Does the "Continious Repo" replace the Centos-Base/Updates repo? Is the "Continious Repo" in a standard place on the CentOS mirrors? Ie. can I just add another line to my rsync script to get this repo? It is not possible for me to just update di