Ah, but Webmin DOES support DNSSEC.
I installed it on a Centos-arm7 that I used in the past for DNS testing,
and there is the option for enabling DNSSEC. So there is hope in this
direction.
Don't see much else in the way of tools. Anyone know of anything
besides Webmin?
thanks
On
Webmin wiki does not cover DNSSEC...
Humpf.
On 2/20/22 20:58, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have been running my DNS server on a Centos7-arm board for some
years and it is past time I get up to date.
Particularly get DNSSEC working.
So I have plenty of cubieboards for running Centos8-arm, but I
I have been running my DNS server on a Centos7-arm board for some years
and it is past time I get up to date.
Particularly get DNSSEC working.
So I have plenty of cubieboards for running Centos8-arm, but I want to
no longer hand configure. I want some help here; getting up in years
and all
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 00:51 +, John Horne wrote:
>
> For many years we have modified the '/etc/named.conf' file to include local
> settings. The disadvantage with this is of course that when bind is updated,
> it creates an '/etc/named.conf.rpmnew' file. We then have to determine what
> is
On 04/12/18 09:41, John Horne wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 08:19 +, J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote:
>> The '/etc/named.conf.rpmnew' file supplied is a bare minimum to
>> "configure the ... server as a caching only nameserver (as a localhost
>> DNS resolver only)". As soon as you start
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 08:19 +, J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote:
> The '/etc/named.conf.rpmnew' file supplied is a bare minimum to
> "configure the ... server as a caching only nameserver (as a localhost
> DNS resolver only)". As soon as you start adding any structure to it
> things change,
The '/etc/named.conf.rpmnew' file supplied is a bare minimum to
"configure the ... server as a caching only nameserver (as a localhost
DNS resolver only)". As soon as you start adding any structure to it
things change, not just are added to. See
'/usr/share/doc/bind-*/sample/etc/named.conf' for
Hello,
For many years we have modified the '/etc/named.conf' file to include local
settings. The disadvantage with this is of course that when bind is updated, it
creates an '/etc/named.conf.rpmnew' file. We then have to determine what is
new, and apply the relevant changes to our modified
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 11:29 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 3/28/2013 11:11 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On 03/28/2013 02:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
is it as simple as adding allow-recursion{} with the appropriate private
subnets and localhost to named.conf ?
Yes. That's basically it.
k,
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
It's the the job of your security
perimeter firewalls to filter local vrs foreign packets and on-session
vrs unsolicited packets.
You say that as though everyone has such tools. Or that they are such
an integrated
On 4/1/2013 6:11 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
it's also very important to implement BCP (Best Common Practice) 38.
BCP 38 recommends router egress filtering. That is, you only route out
what will route back in. That prevents you (or any of your customers)
from being a spoofing source.
of
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
Actually, it's pretty easy with netfilter / iptables. Other firewalls
like pf filter on *BSD an proprietary work similar. If you know your
inside networks you merely add a rule to block incoming packets on your
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:17 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 4/1/2013 6:11 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
it's also very important to implement BCP (Best Common Practice) 38.
BCP 38 recommends router egress filtering. That is, you only route out
what will route back in. That prevents you
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
AFA how BIND should be shipped... Last time I looked (just a couple of
days ago) BIND ships in a fairly secure manner (local caching resolver
listening on localhost only) and the default IP tables blocks DNS
queries
Am 29.03.2013 15:13, schrieb Leon Fauster:
i would suggest to using view clauses to divide such configurations ...
I think that's overkill. allow-recursion{} is perfectly sufficient for
this purpose. Views are only needed if you want to return different
results for the same query from different
Am 28.03.2013 um 19:29 schrieb John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com:
On 3/28/2013 11:11 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On 03/28/2013 02:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
Yes. That's basically it.
k, thanks, looks like its working!
i would suggest to using view clauses to divide such configurations
I have 2 CentOS servers that are both authoritative DNS for several
domains and local resolvers.As configured, they are publicly visible
resolvers, which I've known for awhile is not a good thing.
whats the appropriate way of configuring the bind on CentOS 5.current to
not allow recursion
On 03/28/2013 02:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
is it as simple as adding allow-recursion{} with the appropriate private
subnets and localhost to named.conf ?
Yes. That's basically it.
--
Jorge
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 3/28/2013 11:11 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On 03/28/2013 02:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
is it as simple as adding allow-recursion{} with the appropriate private
subnets and localhost to named.conf ?
Yes. That's basically it.
k, thanks, looks like its working!
--
john r pierce
Hello,
I just get a server with CentOS 6.4, I have install Webmin and
Vitualmin running OK, but I can't run correctly DNS server.
I set hostname: dns.maca.li
Resolution order: Host file, DNS
DNS servers: 127.0.0.1 and 91.121.137.55
Search Domain: maca.li
When I creta virtual server with
It's just saying the records don't match from your parent nameserver.
[root@janus ~]# dig ns maca.li +trace
; DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-20.P1.el5 ns maca.li +trace
;; global options: printcmd
. 3600IN NS i.root-servers.net.
. 3600IN
Hi,
Actually, the website is found, but when I create new virtual servers
withs virutalmin, noone can be access.
I have already try
ns.maca.li. IN A 91.121.137.55
NS INNSmaca.li.
But it do nothing,
Thanks,
Ernesto
Quoting Banyan He ban...@rootong.com:
Hi
what do they access to? How to access? How's the verification being
handled here?
Maybe a capture on port 53 explains everything.
Banyan He
Blog: http://www.rootong.com
Email: ban...@rootong.com
On 3/19/2013 1:15 AM, Weplica wrote:
Hi,
Actually, the website is found, but when I
Hi
Does anyone know if its possible to set a search domain within anaconda to use
during kickstart?
I'd rather not have to set a FQDN for a certain service as its location
specific that is dependent on SSL and therefore the certs.
I cant see anything in the docs listed but i thought i'd ask
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 16:43 +, Tom Brown wrote:
Hi
Does anyone know if its possible to set a search domain within anaconda to
use during kickstart?
I'd rather not have to set a FQDN for a certain service as its location
specific that is dependent on SSL and therefore the certs.
Actually, my kickstarts run with the DNS info provided by my DNCP
server. The only thing that I've had to do is copy the
created /etc/resolv.conf file into the newly-built tree so that it's
available to the system for running post scripts.
thanks for the reply - these are statically
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 17:04 +, Tom Brown wrote:
Actually, my kickstarts run with the DNS info provided by my DNCP
server. The only thing that I've had to do is copy the
created /etc/resolv.conf file into the newly-built tree so that it's
available to the system for running post
I could be the issue is thus (i have worked around it but its not clean enough
for my liking)
i have a service that runs under SSL that is a global service that resolves
locally - That is in dc A the IP is different to dc B however the service sits
behind the same SSL certs that are non
On 02/08/2013 11:09 AM, Ed Morrison wrote:
For whatever reason I can not get dns caching to work on any of my
centos boxes. Running Centos 5 and 6. Any thoughts on why these will
not run? The services start fine but when telling to perform a dig
using itself as the resolver the queries fail
On 02/09/2013 07:01 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
Check the following line in /etc/named.conf and make sure you have both
ip addresses:
I'm sorry. I thought you were running BIND. I'm on that list too...got
to pay more attention next time!
Anyway, check the bind (no pun intended!) address doing
On 02/08/2013 03:09 PM, Ed Morrison wrote:
The services start fine but when telling to perform a dig using itself
as the resolver the queries fail
Check the following line in /etc/named.conf and make sure you have both
ip addresses:
listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 192.168.1.6; };
Also, if
Hi All:
For whatever reason I can not get dns caching to work on any of my
centos boxes. Running Centos 5 and 6. Any thoughts on why these will
not run? The services start fine but when telling to perform a dig
using itself as the resolver the queries fail (See below).
Any help would be
Am 08.02.2013 um 20:09 schrieb Ed Morrison edward.morri...@gmail.com:
For whatever reason I can not get dns caching to work on any of my
centos boxes. Running Centos 5 and 6. Any thoughts on why these will
not run? The services start fine but when telling to perform a dig
using itself as
Am Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:18:19 -0700
schrieb John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com:
On 08/16/12 9:54 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Aug 17 07:41:38 mx2 named[6873]: client 205.145.64.200#53: query
(cache) 'ripe.net/ANY/IN' denied
Aug 17 07:41:38 mx2 named[6873]: client 204.10.45.5#53: query
(cache)
On 17.8.2012 8.18, John R Pierce wrote:
meh, if its coming from lots of random hosts, then fail2ban style
techniques won't work. I assume this is an authoritative name server?
does it have recursive queries disabled so it can only return results
for the domain(s) its authoritative for ?
Yes,
From: Jussi Hirvi listmem...@greenspot.fi
On 17.8.2012 8.18, John R Pierce wrote:
meh, if its coming from lots of random hosts, then fail2ban style
techniques won't work. I assume this is an authoritative name server?
does it have recursive queries disabled so it can only return results
On 17.8.2012 15.04, John Doe wrote:
Maybe it is this:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/03/how-anonymous-plans-to-use-dns-as-a-weapon/
Interesting idea. In that case the ip's in my logs would point to the
targets of the attact. I checked a few of them, and they look more like
hijacked
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
On 17.8.2012 15.04, John Doe wrote:
Maybe it is this:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/03/how-anonymous-plans-to-use-dns-as-a-weapon/
Interesting idea. In that case the ip's in my logs would point to the
targets of the attact. I checked a few of them, and they look
Looks like one of my name servers (CentOS 5) gets a lot of malicious
queries. The cpu load is constantly about 3 %. I put on stricter limits
on who is allowed recursive queries, but this does not affect the CPU
load. I also updated bind.
I temporarily turned on querylog (command: rndc
On 08/16/12 9:54 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Aug 17 07:41:38 mx2 named[6873]: client 205.145.64.200#53: query (cache)
'ripe.net/ANY/IN' denied
Aug 17 07:41:38 mx2 named[6873]: client 204.10.45.5#53: query (cache)
'ripe.net/ANY/IN' denied
Aug 17 07:41:38 mx2 named[6873]: client 78.40.35.212#53:
On 26/07/2012 02:40, David McGuffey wrote:
On Jul 25, 2012, at 21:27, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com
wrote:
DNS lookups default to using 53/udp, and only use 53/tcp for zone
transfers. could it be 53/udp is being lost/blocked between this host
and your ns1 ?
Unfortunately
On Wednesday 25 July 2012 17:47, the following was written:
I used dig from the email svr command line with the primary DNS svr up
and (naturally) it pulled from there as normal. Then I downed the
primary DNS svr, saw the nagios check fail and tried again. The same
dig lookup was
I'm a bit baffled by this and I'm looking for ideas...
background:
two DNS servers (ns1 ns2)(64bit CentOS 5.8)
one email server (64bit CentOS 5.8 postfix 2.3.3)
one nagios server (64bit CentOS 5.8 nagios 3.3.1)
situation:
- all servers configured to use both DNS servers for lookups
- ns1
Does dig use libresolv or read directly from resolv.conf? Also do you have a
timeout configured in resolv.conf or are you relying on the os default?
On 25 Jul 2012, at 21:57, Steve Lindemann st...@marmot.org wrote:
I'm a bit baffled by this and I'm looking for ideas...
background:
two DNS
On 07/25/2012 10:57 PM, Steve Lindemann wrote:
I'm a bit baffled by this and I'm looking for ideas...
background:
two DNS servers (ns1 ns2)(64bit CentOS 5.8)
one email server (64bit CentOS 5.8 postfix 2.3.3)
one nagios server (64bit CentOS 5.8 nagios 3.3.1)
situation:
- all servers
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 07/25/2012 10:57 PM, Steve Lindemann wrote:
I'm a bit baffled by this and I'm looking for ideas...
background:
two DNS servers (ns1 ns2)(64bit CentOS 5.8)
one email server (64bit CentOS 5.8 postfix
On 7/25/2012 3:21 PM, Tom Brown wrote:
Does dig use libresolv or read directly from resolv.conf? Also do you have a
timeout configured in resolv.conf or are you relying on the os default?
dig uses resolv.conf and no timeouts are configured there. I don't know
there the OS would have a
On 07/25/12 1:57 PM, Steve Lindemann wrote:
Anyone have any ideas for why nagios would have trouble testing smtp on
the email server when the primary dns goes offline? I'm not even sure
where to look or who else would make sense to ask the question of on
this one. I'd appreciate any insight
dig uses resolv.conf and no timeouts are configured there. I don't know
there the OS would have a default configured or what it is. Another
reply indicated there would be a 5 second delay. That seems a bit high
to me.
I used dig from the email svr command line with the primary DNS svr up
On 7/25/2012 3:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 07/25/12 1:57 PM, Steve Lindemann wrote:
Anyone have any ideas for why nagios would have trouble testing smtp on
the email server when the primary dns goes offline? I'm not even sure
where to look or who else would make sense to ask the question
On 7/25/2012 3:58 PM, Tom Brown wrote:
dig uses resolv.conf and no timeouts are configured there. I don't know
there the OS would have a default configured or what it is. Another
reply indicated there would be a 5 second delay. That seems a bit high
to me.
I used dig from the email svr
DNS lookups default to using 53/udp, and only use 53/tcp for zone
transfers. could it be 53/udp is being lost/blocked between this host
and your ns1 ?
Unfortunately that is a common misconception.
Tcp is used far more often than only as stated such as for size of request
exceeding udp response
On Jul 25, 2012, at 21:27, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
DNS lookups default to using 53/udp, and only use 53/tcp for zone
transfers. could it be 53/udp is being lost/blocked between this host
and your ns1 ?
Unfortunately that is a common misconception.
Tcp is used
No idea where else to ask this and get a real qualified answer but here.
Not exactly pure centos questionbut...
I am adding blacklists to my postfix smtpd settings.
I have the inkling that after the first lookup for a domain or ip that
my dns caches the result and I no longer bother the RBL
On 04/04/2012 08:48 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
No idea where else to ask this and get a real qualified answer but here.
Not exactly pure centos questionbut...
I am adding blacklists to my postfix smtpd settings.
I have the inkling that after the first lookup for a domain or ip that
my dns
On 4/5/2012 12:52 AM, Nataraj wrote:
On 04/04/2012 08:48 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
No idea where else to ask this and get a real qualified answer but here.
Not exactly pure centos questionbut...
I am adding blacklists to my postfix smtpd settings.
I have the inkling that after the first
Hi,
I do have a domain and a couple of different ip networks.
E.g. domainname.de and 172.17.0.0/16 and 192.168.200.0/24
In our old dns files I only have a reverse master zone for the
172.17.-lans, but also 192.168.200.x addresses in the forward zone config.
My question: dose maybe someone
Hi Götz,
My question: dose maybe someone forgot the 192.168.200.x reverse zone
files and config
probably.
and can I just create a file like that for the 172.17
hosts and adding the config for the reverse zone to my named.conf?
Yes, *if* you either have the only DNS in your network (not a
Hi all
How can I know the refresh rate of the dns server?
Thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
What do you mean by refresh rate of the dns server? Like TTL length of records?
Or..?
Aly
--Original Message--
From: ann kok
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: centos@centos.org
ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] dns question
Sent: Mar 22, 2011 9:13 AM
Hi all
How can I
As was previously mentioned, you need to be more clear about what
you're asking. There are multiple related concepts. Look up a
description of the SOA record, in particular the refresh, retry,
expire, and minimum TTL fields. The first three affect how DNS
secondary servers behave. The last
On 03/22/11 6:13 AM, ann kok wrote:
Hi all
How can I know the refresh rate of the dns server?
http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596001582
http://www.isc.org/software/bind/documentation
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ann kok said the following on 22/03/11 14:13:
How can I know the refresh rate of the dns server?
$ dig www.google.com
...
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.google.com. 515949 IN CNAME www.l.google.com.
www.l.google.com. 300 IN
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Phil Savoie psavoie1...@rogers.com wrote:
On 11/18/2010 07:09 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
Box is fully updated CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). DHCP is from the ADSL modem
192.168.1.1. After I update the DNS settings and restart the network,
the DNS changes do not hold. I have
On Thursday 18 November 2010 12:25, John Hodrien wrote:
DHCP will always over write the resolv.conf file when started.
Importantly, no. PEERDNS=no is designed for exactly this purpose.
Thnx for the information and setting me straight.
--
Regards
Robert
Linux
The adventure of a life
Box is fully updated CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). DHCP is from the ADSL modem
192.168.1.1. After I update the DNS settings and restart the network,
the DNS changes do not hold. I have tried using this GUI, as a regular
user, after giving the root password, and, also, logged in as the root
user.
When I
On 11/18/2010 07:09 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
Box is fully updated CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). DHCP is from the ADSL modem
192.168.1.1. After I update the DNS settings and restart the network,
the DNS changes do not hold. I have tried using this GUI, as a regular
user, after giving the root password,
On Thursday 18 November 2010 07:09, Lanny Marcus wrote:
Box is fully updated CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). DHCP is from the ADSL modem
192.168.1.1. After I update the DNS settings and restart the network,
the DNS changes do not hold. I have tried using this GUI, as a regular
user, after giving the
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Robert Spangler wrote:
DHCP will always over write the resolv.conf file when started.
Importantly, no. PEERDNS=no is designed for exactly this purpose.
jh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
I am not using Samba 3.x. I am using Samba3x-3.3.8. As I understand it,
RHEL provided this branch so that Windows 7 could join a Samba domain.
That aside, It does not seems to me that the error message indicates that
it cannot resolve where the PDC is. What method is Windows 7 trying to use
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 08:13 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
I am not using Samba 3.x. I am using Samba3x-3.3.8. As I understand
it, RHEL provided this branch so that Windows 7 could join a Samba
domain.
That aside, It does not seems to me that the error message indicates
that it cannot resolve
I think as long as persist in chasing pointless ends, you will continue
to fail.
DNS AD are not at issue here. Samba 3 cannot provide AD services.
If resolution is a problem, it may be that you don't have nmb running on
your Samba server and you probably want it to be a wins server if it
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:34 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
I think as long as persist in chasing pointless ends, you will
continue
to fail.
DNS AD are not at issue here. Samba 3 cannot provide AD
services.
If resolution
I think you are being vague (similar error).
What is the exact error?
What is the output of 'testparm -sv' ?
Craig
Sorry for being to vague.
Here is the XP Pro error I get when I try to join the domain.
A domian controller for the domain admin could not be contacted.
Esure that the
Sorry for being to vague.
Here is the XP Pro error I get when I try to join the domain.
A domian controller for the domain admin could not be contacted.
Esure that the domain name is typed correctly.
If the name is correct, click on the Details for troubleshooting
information.
Details:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:03 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
I think you are being vague (similar error).
What is the exact error?
What is the output of 'testparm -sv' ?
Craig
Sorry for being to vague.
Here is the
On 07/08/2010 05:34 PM, Doug Coats wrote:
...
Has anyone been able to get Samba3x.3.3.8 to work as a PDC?
It worked for me in a test setup I had a month ago:
Made a copy of our main CentOS 5 server, replace samba with samba3x,
and I was able to join XP and W7 (with registry patch) to the
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:03 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
Here is the testparm -sv you requested.
For a short explaination of the IP's listed. We have two domains.
One served by 192.168.6.1 and one by 192.168.5.1. I am currantly
upgrading the 192.168.6. network to Windows 7. Or atleast
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 13:44 -0400, JohnS wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:03 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
Here is the testparm -sv you requested.
For a short explaination of the IP's listed. We have two domains.
One served by 192.168.6.1 and one by 192.168.5.1. I am currantly
His problem is WINS resolution doesn't tell the workstations which
computer is the domain controller and that is what he needs to fix
(first by designating a domain controller and then by making sure that
WINS is functioning well).
Craig
Thanks for all the help. I agree that WINS seems
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:50 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 13:44 -0400, JohnS wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:03 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
Here is the testparm -sv you requested.
For a short explaination of the IP's listed. We have two domains.
One served
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:58 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
His problem is WINS resolution doesn't tell the workstations
which
computer is the domain controller and that is what he needs to
fix
(first by designating a domain controller and then by
a 'network' is 192.168.x assuming that you are using class C subnet
masks (255.255.255.0) and so you should have a WINS server on EACH
network (192.168.4, 192.168.5, 192.168.6, etc.)
Cross network browsing is somewhat of a hit or miss and not reliable...
for a number of reasons such as the
On 7/8/2010 1:15 PM, Craig White wrote:
a 'network' is 192.168.x assuming that you are using class C subnet
masks (255.255.255.0) and so you should have a WINS server on EACH
network (192.168.4, 192.168.5, 192.168.6, etc.)
I thought the point of WINS was to have a single address that would
I do think that I have hit upon an issue. The WINS data for samba is kept
in /var/cache/samba.dat but it is updated dynamically with nmdb. It has
dated data. When I moved the server I changed the server name slightly and
so the WINS data points to the old name at the current IP. In fact
Doug Coats wrote:
I do think that I have hit upon an issue. The WINS data for samba is
kept in /var/cache/samba.dat but it is updated dynamically with nmdb.
It has
dated data. When I moved the server I changed the server name slightly
and so the WINS data points to the old name at the
With the WINS data cleared. for the past 20 min. (I did it before I wrote
about it) Neither PDC has reported to WINS. So no wonder my PC's can't find
their domain.
So how do I make sure that 192.168.6.1 is added to wins.dat. I could do it
manually but I would rather it communicate the way that
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 13:41 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
I agree that preferred master should have been set to yes. I made
that change with but still no joy.
I don't mean to be contrary but our cross subnet browsing has been
working since 2003 when we set up this network. It has been very
Um, does a timing issue come into play here? If the local clock is not
within a few seconds, we can't connect to AD (we are going through
kerborous). Is there time data in the cache?
mark
Both the XP box and the Windows 7 use the PDC server as their time server so
they are set to
---
Ok since you say the interdomain networking is functioning (triangle
routing) have a read at this:
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/domain-member.html#id2573732
John
all else that fails put that machine on another known working Subnet and
have a go at that.
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 13:43 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 7/8/2010 1:15 PM, Craig White wrote:
a 'network' is 192.168.x assuming that you are using class C subnet
masks (255.255.255.0) and so you should have a WINS server on EACH
network (192.168.4, 192.168.5, 192.168.6, etc.)
I
On 7/8/2010 1:52 PM, Doug Coats wrote:
With the WINS data cleared. for the past 20 min. (I did it before I
wrote about it) Neither PDC has reported to WINS. So no wonder my PC's
can't find their domain.
So how do I make sure that 192.168.6.1 is added to wins.dat. I could do
it manually but
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 13:52 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
With the WINS data cleared. for the past 20 min. (I did it before I
wrote about it) Neither PDC has reported to WINS. So no wonder my
PC's can't find their domain.
So how do I make sure that 192.168.6.1 is added to wins.dat. I could
On 7/8/2010 2:12 PM, Craig White wrote:
I thought the point of WINS was to have a single address that would
collate the names/addresses from all your networks.
The important thing is to get the WINS working on EACH network. It's
also easiest to have your PDC be the WINS server - period.
I just did a checkconfig on the PDC in question 192.168.6.1. And I noticed
something that might be nothing but it puzzles me. The nmb service is set
to off at all run levels. If I check the nmb status it says that it is
stopped. Doesn't Samba need that for net-bios support? I am probably
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:12 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
As I said in another post I changed the machine name to an entirely
different format and I didn't copy any domain information from the
prior machine(meaning I didn't try to migrate the information placed
in the smbpasswd). Since all the
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:29 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
WINS is a broadcast based protocol and thus it only works on the local
network and each subnet/network MUST necessarily have master browser
elections. The WINS server on each subnet would serve as a clearing
house for name resolution
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:36 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
I just did a checkconfig on the PDC in question 192.168.6.1. And I
noticed something that might be nothing but it puzzles me. The nmb
service is set to off at all run levels. If I check the nmb status
it says that it is stopped. Doesn't
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:36 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
I just did a checkconfig on the PDC in question 192.168.6.1. And I
noticed something that might be nothing but it puzzles me. The nmb
service is set to off at all run levels. If I check the nmb status
it says that it is stopped. Doesn't
Doug Coats wrote:
mark wrote:
Um, does a timing issue come into play here? If the local clock is not
within a few seconds, we can't connect to AD (we are going through
kerborous). Is there time data in the cache?
Both the XP box and the Windows 7 use the PDC server as their time server
so
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
