On 12/08/2014 08:35 PM, David McGuffey wrote:
I'll still get ready for another failure. Will read up on the best
methods to have an encrypted filesystem on top of raid-1.
I'm pretty sure that if you tell the Fedora installer to build an
encrypted RAID1 system, you'll get exactly what I describ
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 21:11 -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 16:46 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 12/04/2014 05:45 AM, David McGuffey wrote:
>
> > In practice, however, there's a bunch of information you didn't provide,
> > so some of those steps are wrong.
> >
> > I'm n
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 16:46 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 12/04/2014 05:45 AM, David McGuffey wrote:
> In practice, however, there's a bunch of information you didn't provide,
> so some of those steps are wrong.
>
> I'm not sure what dm-0, dm-2 and dm-3 are, but they're indicated in your
>
On 12/04/2014 05:45 AM, David McGuffey wrote:
md0 is made up of two 250G disks on which the OS and a very large /var
partions resides for a number of virtual machines.
...
Challenge is that disk 0 of md0 is the problem and it has a 524M /boot
partition outside of the raid partition.
Assuming
Thanks for all the responses. A little more digging revealed:
md0 is made up of two 250G disks on which the OS and a very large /var
partions resides for a number of virtual machines.
md1 is made up of two 2T disks on which /home resides.
Challenge is that disk 0 of md0 is the problem and it ha
Hi David,
Am 03.12.2014 um 02:14 schrieb David McGuffey :
> This is an automatically generated mail message from mdadm
> running on desk4
>
> A DegradedArray event had been detected on md device /dev/md0.
>
> Faithfully yours, etc.
>
> P.S. The /proc/mdstat file currently contains the following
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 12/03/2014 03:24 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
>
>> OTOH, I had a perfectly good drive get kicked out of my RAID-1
>> array a fewyears ago just because, well, I guess I could say
>> "it felt like it".
>>
>
> I've seen that too several times on my h
On 12/03/2014 03:24 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
OTOH, I had a perfectly good drive get kicked out of my RAID-1
array a fewyears ago just because, well, I guess I could say
"it felt like it".
I've seen that too several times on my home "server".
Once in a while (usually on one of the first days I'm o
On 12/2/2014 6:24 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
In reality, I had (in my ignorance) purchased a pair of WD
drives that aren't intended to be used in a RAID array, and
once in a long while (that was actually the only such instance
in the 4-5 years I've had that RAID array) it doesn't respond to
some HD co
On 2014-12-03, David McGuffey wrote:
>
> Appears to me that device 0 (/dev/dm-2) on md0 has been removed because
> of problems.
That looks about right. There may be more error messages in your system
logs (e.g., /var/log/messages, dmesg), which might tell you more about
the nature of the failure
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:14:19PM -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
> Received the following message in mail to root:
>
> Message 257:
> >From root@desk4.localdomain Tue Oct 28 07:25:37 2014
> Return-Path:
> X-Original-To: root
> Delivered-To: root@desk4.localdomain
> From: mdadm monitoring
> To: r
On 02/12/14 08:14 PM, David McGuffey wrote:
Received the following message in mail to root:
Message 257:
From root@desk4.localdomain Tue Oct 28 07:25:37 2014
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: root
Delivered-To: root@desk4.localdomain
From: mdadm monitoring
To: root@desk4.localdomain
Subject: Degra
Received the following message in mail to root:
Message 257:
>From root@desk4.localdomain Tue Oct 28 07:25:37 2014
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: root
Delivered-To: root@desk4.localdomain
From: mdadm monitoring
To: root@desk4.localdomain
Subject: DegradedArray event on /dev/md0:desk4
Date: Tue, 28
13 matches
Mail list logo
