On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:52:52AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Darryl Ross wrote:
>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>> So looks like I am stuck with IPv4 no matter what. Unless there is some
>>> magic glue in rc.sysinit.
>>>
>>
>> Build a custom kernel and remove ipv4 support (or make it
Darryl Ross wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So looks like I am stuck with IPv4 no matter what. Unless there is some
magic glue in rc.sysinit.
Build a custom kernel and remove ipv4 support (or make it a module). It really
isn't that hard.
It really is not worth it.
The desire to disabl
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> So looks like I am stuck with IPv4 no matter what. Unless there is some
> magic glue in rc.sysinit.
Build a custom kernel and remove ipv4 support (or make it a module). It really
isn't that hard.
-D
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
Bad news...
Barry Brimer wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:09:21AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 2
Hey, wait a minute, I have in my /etc/modprobe.conf: alias net-pf-2 off
WHAT GIVES HERE
It's probab
Barry Brimer wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stephen Harris wrote:
>> It's probably compiled into the kernel directly and not as a module.
>
> I'm not convinced .. you can start without network .. although that may
> just load the interfaces .. I would chkconfig network off and boot
> again. If net-
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:09:21AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 2
Hey, wait a minute, I have in my /etc/modprobe.conf: alias net-pf-2 off
WHAT GIVES HERE
It's probably compiled into the kernel direct
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:09:21AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 2
>
> Hey, wait a minute, I have in my /etc/modprobe.conf: alias net-pf-2 off
>
> WHAT GIVES HERE
It's probably compiled into the kernel directly and not as a module.
--
rgds
Steph
Nope.
Barry Brimer wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Barry Brimer wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Barry Brimer wrote:
Quoting Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I want to seriously work with IPv6 and not have stray IPv4 functions
messing with
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Barry Brimer wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Barry Brimer wrote:
Quoting Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I want to seriously work with IPv6 and not have stray IPv4 functions
messing with me.
So in /etc/sysconfig/n
Barry Brimer wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Barry Brimer wrote:
Quoting Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I want to seriously work with IPv6 and not have stray IPv4 functions
messing with me.
So in /etc/sysconfig/network, I commented out NETWORKING=yes. I have
NE
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Barry Brimer wrote:
Quoting Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I want to seriously work with IPv6 and not have stray IPv4 functions
messing with me.
So in /etc/sysconfig/network, I commented out NETWORKING=yes. I have
NETWORKING_IPV6=yes.
Barry Brimer wrote:
Quoting Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I want to seriously work with IPv6 and not have stray IPv4 functions
messing with me.
So in /etc/sysconfig/network, I commented out NETWORKING=yes. I have
NETWORKING_IPV6=yes.
In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts I altered ifc
Quoting Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I want to seriously work with IPv6 and not have stray IPv4 functions
> messing with me.
>
> So in /etc/sysconfig/network, I commented out NETWORKING=yes. I have
> NETWORKING_IPV6=yes.
>
> In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts I altered ifcfg-eth0, setti
I want to seriously work with IPv6 and not have stray IPv4 functions
messing with me.
So in /etc/sysconfig/network, I commented out NETWORKING=yes. I have
NETWORKING_IPV6=yes.
In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts I altered ifcfg-eth0, setting
BOOTPROTO=none. That was enough for eth0 to only h
14 matches
Mail list logo
