Mark Weaver wrote:
umair shakil wrote:
Dear Salam,
Well i have used the command on shell "updatedb" it will allow you to
make fast
searching.
Regards,
Umair Shakil
ETD
um... what?
Peace, peace. He appears to have read between the lines and come to
conclusion the OP was trying to impr
On Saturday 22 September 2007, umair shakil wrote:
> Dear Salam,
>
> No it doesnot slow down the system
>
> Regards,
>
> Umair Shakil
> ETD
>
> On 9/21/07, Feizhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > umair shakil wrote:
> > > Dear Salam,
> > >
> > > Well i have used the command on shell "updatedb" it wi
Dear Salam,
No it doesnot slow down the system
Regards,
Umair Shakil
ETD
On 9/21/07, Feizhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> umair shakil wrote:
> > Dear Salam,
> >
> > Well i have used the command on shell "updatedb" it will allow you to
> > make fast
> > searching.
>
> and slow down the whole
umair shakil wrote:
Dear Salam,
Well i have used the command on shell "updatedb" it will allow you to
make fast
searching.
Regards,
Umair Shakil
ETD
um... what?
--
Mark
"If you have found a very wise man, then you've found
a man that at one time was an idiot and lived long enough
to lea
Brian Mathis wrote:
On 9/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That or run buzzsaw (win) which is a continuous defragmenter (well,
when the system is idle that is) that runs in the background and only
costs $10. Pagedefrag from sysinternals doesn't hurt either (and it's free
off
On 9/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That or run buzzsaw (win) which is a continuous defragmenter (well,
> when the system is idle that is) that runs in the background and only
> costs $10. Pagedefrag from sysinternals doesn't hurt either (and it's free
> off ms' website).
IME defragging is highly needed in busy servers that use a lot of disk.
Every single one of my clients have seen server performance tank when
fragmentation goes over 15% or so..including the workstations. In vista
it's still necessary.
John R Pierce wrote:
you're in luck cause you don't d
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 01:48:07AM -0400, Peter Arremann wrote:
> the filesystem doesn't get that full and if you really want to defrag, copy
> the data off and back on. Its the best way to do it.
This is, in fact, the historically correct answer as well. Backup, newfs,
restore. aka "Nuke it fr
umair shakil wrote:
Dear Salam,
Well i have used the command on shell "updatedb" it will allow you to
make fast
searching.
and slow down the whole box during updatedb :-)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
On Thursday 20 September 2007, Al Sparks wrote:
> Why? What's different between NTFS and ext2/3 that defragging is
> needed in one but not the other?
>=== Al
And this is the right question to ask...
Anyway - the answer about defragging, if you really care to understand it, is
pretty length.
Dear Salam,
Well i have used the command on shell "updatedb" it will allow you to make
fast
searching.
Regards,
Umair Shakil
ETD
On 9/21/07, Al Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A couple of questions. Are there any linux tools that can de-frag an
> ext2/3 partition?
>
> Are there any adva
On 9/20/07, Al Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why? What's different between NTFS and ext2/3 that defragging is
> needed in one but not the other?
Mostly it has to do with the way information is ordered and written to
the filesystem. The old FAT filesystem (and to a lesser extent NTFS)
was s
ther I just like the products.
Geoff
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld.
-Original Message-
From: John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:38:40
To:CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Disk De-Fraging in Linux
>> you're in luck cause you do
Al Sparks wrote:
Al Sparks wrote:
A couple of questions. Are there any linux tools that can de-frag an
ext2/3 partition?
ext2, yes. ext3, no. And it is called a filesystem. A partition is a
completely different thing. none for ext3 because it was not really
necessary for ext2 and so the too
you're in luck cause you don't defrag an ext2/3 partition at all. defrag
is for windows file systems. Ext file systems are a different animal
all-together.
Why? What's different between NTFS and ext2/3 that defragging is
needed in one but not the other?
IMHO, defragging is highly o
> Al Sparks wrote:
>> A couple of questions. Are there any linux tools that can de-frag an
>> ext2/3 partition?
>>
>> Are there any advantages to doing so if you're running hardware RAID5?
>>
>> Are there advantages / disadvantages if you're running LVM?
>>=== Al
>
> you're in luck cause you
Al Sparks wrote:
A couple of questions. Are there any linux tools that can de-frag an
ext2/3 partition?
Are there any advantages to doing so if you're running hardware RAID5?
Are there advantages / disadvantages if you're running LVM?
=== Al
you're in luck cause you don't defrag an ext2/3
A couple of questions. Are there any linux tools that can de-frag an
ext2/3 partition?
Are there any advantages to doing so if you're running hardware RAID5?
Are there advantages / disadvantages if you're running LVM?
=== Al
___
CentOS mailing lis
18 matches
Mail list logo
