Filipe Brandenburger wrote on Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:29:06 -0400:
> $ du -h test.txt
> 8.0K test.txt
and just "du test.txt"? e.g. without "translation"?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
Robert Nichols wrote:
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> Found it! It's not related to CentOS 4 or 5 (I found a C4 machine in
>> which small files took 8kb of diskspace and a C5 machine in which
>> small files took 4kb). It's related to SELinux being enabled or not.
>> Casually most of my C4 machines
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Found it! It's not related to CentOS 4 or 5 (I found a C4 machine in
> which small files took 8kb of diskspace and a C5 machine in which
> small files took 4kb). It's related to SELinux being enabled or not.
> Casually most of my C4 machines had SELinux disabled and mo
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 17:29, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
> If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
> file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
> I'm using.
Found it! It's not related to CentOS 4 or 5 (I found a C4 machine in
which sm
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 17:29 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed something unusual today.
>
> If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
> file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
> I'm using.
>
> I tried this on severa
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed something unusual today.
>
> If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
> file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
> I'm using.
>
> I tried this on several CentOS 5 machines, both x86_64 and
On Wed, March 11, 2009 5:51 pm, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed something unusual today.
>>
>> If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
>> file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
>> I'm u
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> $ echo test >test.txt
>> $ ls -l test.txt
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 filbranden filbranden 5 Mar 11 17:24 test.txt
>> $ du -h test.txt
>> 8.0K test.txt
>
>> I could not find any differences that would explain the behaviour.
>> Have you seen this before? Can you reproduce it on
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hello,
I noticed something unusual today.
If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
I'm using.
I tried this on several CentOS 5 machine
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed something unusual today.
>
> If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
> file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
> I'm using.
>
> I tried this on several CentOS 5 machines, both x86_64 an
Hello,
I noticed something unusual today.
If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
I'm using.
I tried this on several CentOS 5 machines, both x86_64 and i386:
$ echo test >test.txt
$ ls -l test.txt
11 matches
Mail list logo
