-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 6:38 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
here is a bit more trivia for those
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Robert Spangler
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 12:42 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
If your torrent has distributed hash
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Michael A. Peters
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:56 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
I think my ISP at home has done
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of William L. Maltby
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 3:26 AM
To: CentOS General List
Subject: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
For those who may forget, usin torrents
For those who may forget, usin torrents to download and share the new
images will get you faster downloads (if enough folks participate) if
you have a fat pipe and alleviate the load on the CentOS servers.
I have a chubby pipe (~ 1.2MB/sec) and got the stuff really quickly
earlier today.
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 09:14 +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
snip
Hi there,
there's really some traffic going on torrent-wise:
[View: main]
CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-DVD
done 3787,1 MB Rate: 928,2 / 0,0 KB Uploaded: 142450,0 MB
[View: main]
CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD
done 4346,3 MB
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of William L. Maltby
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:47 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
For those who are insatiably curious
Sorin Srbu wrote:
According to wifey, I'm one of those insatiably curious ones. ;-) Anyway,
that's a lot of data being shuffled! You don't see that kind of TB-amounts
everyday, at least I don't.
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:07 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
Sorin Srbu wrote:
According to wifey
Sorin Srbu wrote:
That's dedication... I decap my bt-client after work hours (from 1700hrs to
0700 weekdays, and full speed continuesly over the weekends). I wonder if
the ridiculously high 40k-share ratio Azureus reports here has something to
do with this. Hmm...
the machines seeding at
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:34 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
Sorin Srbu wrote:
That's dedication... I
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Sorin Srbu wrote:
According to wifey, I'm one of those insatiably curious ones. ;-) Anyway,
that's a lot of data being shuffled! You don't see that kind of TB-amounts
everyday, at least I don't.
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main
John R Pierce wrote:
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps.
geez, makes me wonder if I should even bother to leave mine running with
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps.
geez, makes me
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps.
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a
peer?
yes, which is why I said all these machines were locaed inside hosting
DC's - which normally have good connectivity. One on the East coast US,
one on the West Coast, one in Germany, one in
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 22:19 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a
peer?
yes, which is why I said all these machines were locaed inside hosting
DC's - which normally have good connectivity. One on
on 4-2-2009 1:36 PM Marko Vojinovic spake the following:
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
in the early
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 21:26, William L. Maltby wrote:
If your torrent has distributed hash table capability, I suggest that
you also use that feature.
Happy sharing!
So what is everyone using for their torrent?
What is the best?
--
Regards
Robert
Linux User #296285
Robert Spangler wrote:
So what is everyone using for their torrent?
What is the best?
(rtorrent) ftw!
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 18:41 -0400, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 21:26, William L. Maltby wrote:
If your torrent has distributed hash table capability, I suggest that
you also use that feature.
Happy sharing!
So what is everyone using for their torrent?
What
For those who may forget, usin torrents to download and share the new
images will get you faster downloads (if enough folks participate) if
you have a fat pipe and alleviate the load on the CentOS servers.
I have a chubby pipe (~ 1.2MB/sec) and got the stuff really quickly
earlier today.
If your
22 matches
Mail list logo
