On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Joseph L.
Casale wrote:
> Anyone got any experience/suggestions for a way to store a directory of
> sensitive information on a CentOS box? This directory contains many scripts
> and output files, I need it backed up but not unencrypted and don't want
> to store it i
>If you want to backup the directory while it is still encrypted (not
>mounted), look for encfs.
>
>But I prefer luks myself (uses dm-crypt).
I see, looking at all of these, it looks like luks uses built-in modules
and tools whereas the others need fuse or something like it. The luks option
looks
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 05:23:48PM +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Anyone got any experience/suggestions for a way to store a directory of
> sensitive information on a CentOS box? This directory contains many scripts
> and output files, I need it backed up but not unencrypted and don't want
> to s
I use encfs, http://www.arg0.net/encfs, and it's working fine.
Daniel.
* Joseph L. Casale [08/10/2009 13:26]:
> Anyone got any experience/suggestions for a way to store a directory of
> sensitive information on a CentOS box? This directory contains many scripts
> and output files, I need it back
Anyone got any experience/suggestions for a way to store a directory of
sensitive information on a CentOS box? This directory contains many scripts
and output files, I need it backed up but not unencrypted and don't want
to store it in a tar file type archive as when it needs to be accessed and
hav
5 matches
Mail list logo