RE: [CentOS] Expandable network storage

2007-12-17 Thread Bleier Thomas
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:52 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Expandable network storage I want to thank everyone who has provided insight into my thread about clustering MySql. I kind of just sat back and watched it develop. I learned a lot from it all. I have been reading all

Re: [CentOS] Expandable network storage

2007-12-17 Thread Nicolas Sahlqvist
Hi Thomas, On Dec 17, 2007 10:56 AM, Bleier Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm currently thinking about similar configurations, and (also for cost reasons :-) am also thinking about GNBD with two standard servers as a poor man redundant storage - but I'm wondering if that gives

Re: [CentOS] Expandable network storage

2007-12-17 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Mon Dec 17 04:56:57 2007 Subject: RE: [CentOS] Expandable network storage Hi all, I'm currently thinking about similar configurations, and (also for cost reasons :-) am also thinking about GNBD with two

Re: [CentOS] Expandable network storage

2007-12-15 Thread Jure Pečar
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:51:32 -0500 Steve Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't really want to go the route of Fibre channels and ISCSI, and would prefer to use common hardware (which sort of suggests GNBD). Also take a look at ATA over Ethernet (aoe), either from coraid.com or

[CentOS] Expandable network storage

2007-12-14 Thread Steve Campbell
I want to thank everyone who has provided insight into my thread about clustering MySql. I kind of just sat back and watched it develop. I learned a lot from it all. I have been reading all of the documentation on clustering provided by Centos/Red Hat, and find I travel in circles. I read one