Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:52 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Expandable network storage
I want to thank everyone who has provided insight into my thread about
clustering MySql. I kind of just sat back and watched it develop. I
learned a lot from it all.
I have been reading all
Hi Thomas,
On Dec 17, 2007 10:56 AM, Bleier Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently thinking about similar configurations, and (also for cost
reasons :-) am also thinking about GNBD with two standard servers as a
poor man redundant storage - but I'm wondering if that gives
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Mon Dec 17 04:56:57 2007
Subject: RE: [CentOS] Expandable network storage
Hi all,
I'm currently thinking about similar configurations, and (also for cost
reasons :-) am also thinking about GNBD with two
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:51:32 -0500
Steve Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't really want to go
the route of Fibre channels and ISCSI, and would prefer to use common
hardware (which sort of suggests GNBD).
Also take a look at ATA over Ethernet (aoe), either from coraid.com or
I want to thank everyone who has provided insight into my thread about
clustering MySql. I kind of just sat back and watched it develop. I
learned a lot from it all.
I have been reading all of the documentation on clustering provided by
Centos/Red Hat, and find I travel in circles. I read one
5 matches
Mail list logo