Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

2011-01-30 Thread Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >Behalf Of cpol...@surewest.net >Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 5:02 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64 > >Sorin Srbu wrote: > >&g

Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

2011-01-28 Thread cpolish
Les Mikesell wrote: > Are there guidelines about what are reasonable results or will the > 'Smart Health Status' tell you enough after the tests run? In a recent study[1] of a large population of hard drives these assertions stood out: [A]fter their first scan error, drives are 39 times more

Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

2011-01-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/28/2011 10:02 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote: > Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> Anyway, I get a bad block message when running fsck, and am not sure >> whether this is a interface problem between the chair and the monitor or >> something with the tech preview. > > > Having just live through this

Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

2011-01-28 Thread cpolish
Sorin Srbu wrote: > Anyway, I get a bad block message when running fsck, and am not sure > whether this is a interface problem between the chair and the monitor or > something with the tech preview. Having just live through this issue, I recommend you run the extended (long) SMART test on

Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

2011-01-28 Thread Giuseppe Tanzilli - ServerPlan
nt: Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:09 PM >> To: 'CentOS mailing list' >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64 >> >>> For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on >> CentOS 5.5, how has it panned out? Does it perform as expec

Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

2011-01-27 Thread Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >Behalf Of compdoc >Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:09 PM >To: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64 > >>For those of you tha

Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

2011-01-27 Thread Jerry Franz
On 01/27/2011 07:37 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 27 January 2011 15:06, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on CentOS >> 5.5, how has it panned out? Does it perform as expected? How do you feel the >> stability, creation of the FS a

Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

2011-01-27 Thread Blake Hudson
Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64 From: compdoc To: 'CentOS mailing list' Date: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:08:46 AM >> For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on CentOS > 5.5, how has it panned out?

Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

2011-01-27 Thread compdoc
>For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on CentOS 5.5, how has it panned out? Does it perform as expected? How do you feel the stability, creation of the FS and the administration of it is? Ideas and comments welcome. I've recently been using ext4 because I have servers

Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

2011-01-27 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:37 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 27 January 2011 15:06, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on CentOS >> 5.5, how has it panned out? Does it perform as expected? How do you feel the >> stability, creation o

Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

2011-01-27 Thread James Hogarth
On 27 January 2011 15:06, Sorin Srbu wrote: > Hi all, > > For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on CentOS > 5.5, how has it panned out? Does it perform as expected? How do you feel the > stability, creation of the FS and the administration of it is? Ideas and > comments

[CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

2011-01-27 Thread Sorin Srbu
Hi all, For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on CentOS 5.5, how has it panned out? Does it perform as expected? How do you feel the stability, creation of the FS and the administration of it is? Ideas and comments welcome. Thanks. -- BW, Sorin ---