On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Michael D. Berger
wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:49:29 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> [...]
>>
>> Good question. I don't have a hard rule of thumb, but I'd estimate that
>> any one file that takes more than 10 minutes to transfer is too big. So
>> transferri
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:49:29 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
[...]
>
> Good question. I don't have a hard rule of thumb, but I'd estimate that
> any one file that takes more than 10 minutes to transfer is too big. So
> transferring CD images over a high bandwidth local connection at 1
> MByte/sec
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 11/21/10 9:02 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 06:47:04 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Michael D. Berger
>>> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> > From decades of experience in many enviro
On 11/21/10 9:02 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 06:47:04 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Michael D. Berger
>> wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> > From decades of experience in many environments, I can tell you that
>> reliable transfer of large files
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Michael D. Berger
wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 06:47:04 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Michael D. Berger
>> wrote:
> [...]
>>
>>>From decades of experience in many environments, I can tell you that
>> reliable transfer of l
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 06:47:04 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Michael D. Berger
> wrote:
[...]
>
>>From decades of experience in many environments, I can tell you that
> reliable transfer of large files with protocols that require
> uninterrupted transfer is aw
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Michael D. Berger
wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:17:23 -0600, Jay Leafey wrote:
>
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
> [...]
>> This does ring a bell, but the circumstances were a bit different. In
>> our case we were transferring large files between "home" and a remote
>>
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:17:23 -0600, Jay Leafey wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
[...]
> This does ring a bell, but the circumstances were a bit different. In
> our case we were transferring large files between "home" and a remote
> site. SFTP/SCP transfers were stalling part-way through in an
> unpr
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 11/19/10 3:16 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my intranet, I sometimes transfer large files, about 4G,
to an CentOS old box that I use for a web server. I transfer
with ftp or sftp. Usually, before the file is complete, the
transfer "stalls". At that point, ping from th
On 11/20/2010 06:35 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 11/19/10 3:16 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
>> On my intranet, I sometimes transfer large files, about 4G,
>> to an CentOS old box that I use for a web server. I transfer
>> with ftp or sftp. Usually, before the file is complete, the
>> transfer "st
On 11/19/10 3:16 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On my intranet, I sometimes transfer large files, about 4G,
> to an CentOS old box that I use for a web server. I transfer
> with ftp or sftp. Usually, before the file is complete, the
> transfer "stalls". At that point, ping from the destination b
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Michael D. Berger
wrote:
> On my intranet, I sometimes transfer large files, about 4G,
> to an CentOS old box that I use for a web server. I transfer
> with ftp or sftp. Usually, before the file is complete, the
> transfer "stalls". At that point, ping from the
On 20/11/10 8:16 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On my intranet, I sometimes transfer large files, about 4G,
> to an CentOS old box that I use for a web server. I transfer
> with ftp or sftp.
Have you tried scp or rsync?
Regards,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
On my intranet, I sometimes transfer large files, about 4G,
to an CentOS old box that I use for a web server. I transfer
with ftp or sftp. Usually, before the file is complete, the
transfer "stalls". At that point, ping from the destination box
to the router fails. I then deactivate the net int
14 matches
Mail list logo