On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:12:17 +0200 wwp wrote:
> Hello James,
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:06:59 + James Pearson
> wrote:
>
> > wwp wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on
> > >>> EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ES
On 04/20/2017 09:06 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> wwp wrote:
They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on
EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be
released during the next cycle.
>>> Indeed, the latest RHEL 6 update f
Hello James,
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:06:59 + James Pearson
wrote:
> wwp wrote:
> >>>
> >>> They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on
> >>> EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be
> >>> released during the next cycle.
> >>>
> >>>
>
wwp wrote:
>>>
>>> They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on
>>> EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be
>>> released during the next cycle.
>>>
>>>
>> Indeed, the latest RHEL 6 update for firefox is the 52.1.0 ESR release:
>>
>> This updat
Hello Phelps,,
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:18:28 -0400 "Phelps, Matthew"
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> > For the record, I just checked and the released SRPM for EL7 has the
> > proper variables and sources and actually builds on EL6. It uses gtk2
> > from el
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> .
.
.
> >
>
> For the record, I just checked and the released SRPM for EL7 has the
> proper variables and sources and actually builds on EL6. It uses gtk2
> from el6 to build.
>
> They obviously felt more comfortable instead released th
On 03/09/2017 09:01 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 03/09/2017 07:35 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM,
On 03/09/2017 05:46 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> What I am not sure of is if EL7 will stay on the Current Release for the
>> next update or if it will shift back to ESR.
>
> Not quite sure what you mean - the current EL7 firefox 52.0 uses the
> Mozilla Firefox 52.0 ESR so
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/09/2017 07:35 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> >>>
> On Wed, Mar 8,
On 03/09/2017 07:35 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes
wrote:
> On 03/08/2017
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Johnny Hughes
Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> What I am not sure of is if EL7 will stay on the Current Release for the
> next update or if it will shift back to ESR.
Not quite sure what you mean - the current EL7 firefox 52.0 uses the
Mozilla Firefox 52.0 ESR source ...
James Pearson
___
On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Hi, Johnny,
>>>
>>> Johnny Hughes wrote:
I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed
that they have u
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Hi, Johnny,
> >
> > Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed
> >> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8
On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hi, Johnny,
>
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed
>> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to
>> the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left
On 03/08/2017 09:07 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 08.03.2017 um 15:40 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
>>
>> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed
>> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to
>> the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They
Hi, Johnny,
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed
> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to
> the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and EL6
> at the ESR level (45.8.0-2).
>
> EL7:
> ht
> Am 08.03.2017 um 15:40 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
>
> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed
> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to
> the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and EL6
> at the ESR level (45.8.0
I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed
that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to
the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and EL6
at the ESR level (45.8.0-2).
EL7:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0461.html
19 matches
Mail list logo
