Thanks for your reply re. TLS
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Patrick Laimbock wrote:
> It's unclear what you mean. I saw a new message on the ML and responded to
> it. Where did this 'threading breaking' take place?
My mistake; apologies to to other list members.
I had replied to an existing message, to
On 15-04-16 13:14, g wrote:
On 04/15/16 04:29, Patrick Laimbock wrote:
On 15-04-16 00:39, Andrew Daviel wrote:
<<>>
Patrick,
'threading breaking' is against centos etiquette and netiquette.
replying thread breakers does nothing but encourage them to do so again.
many subscribers frown on
On 15-04-16 00:39, Andrew Daviel wrote:
We have a freeradius server using LDAP authentication against openldap.
We have had freeradius-3.0.4-6 on CentOS 7 successfully communicating
with openldap-servers-2.3.43 on CentOS 5.
We need some features in freeradius-3.0.12. When I build that on CentO
We have a freeradius server using LDAP authentication against openldap.
We have had freeradius-3.0.4-6 on CentOS 7 successfully communicating
with openldap-servers-2.3.43 on CentOS 5.
We need some features in freeradius-3.0.12. When I build that on CentOS
6, it initially works, but then deve
4 matches
Mail list logo