-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 6:02 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Glibc sources?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:47 PM, ANDY KENNEDY andy.kenn...@adtran.com
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of ANDY KENNEDY
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 1:32 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Glibc sources?
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:34 PM, ANDY KENNEDY andy.kenn...@adtran.com wrote:
De-ignorant me please: How does one discern the package name EPEL from
mock?
Oh, never mind. I see this is some add-on repo site. Like I said, a
little light will do :).
It's not just 'some' third party repo -
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:47 PM, ANDY KENNEDY andy.kenn...@adtran.com wrote:
How do I tell rpmbuild to build the i686 version of the library in place of
the x86_64? I've
done some looking around on the web and I have found something about:
setarch i686 mock -r something ... rebuild my.rpm
apologies for last top post :-(
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Okay, thanks. I really don't need _EXACT_ match, but close. Again, my
aim is to equip GlibC with some logging facilities IF anyone is using the
gethostbyname(). Given the help from this list, I was able to rebuild
GlibC for CentOS and am testing my stuff now.
I appreciate your help on
Hi Andy,
mock is part of EPEL and is almost certainly what you want to use.
Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289
Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382
DealMax Pty LtdGitHub: @tartansandal
Suite 1416
401 Docklands
snip
The list of packages that were in the mock build root for our build of
the glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.x86_64.src.rpm is here:
http://ur1.ca/ju24m
To get close to an exact match, you need to use mock and use the
packages listed above (and only those versions) if you are trying to
I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for
testing with
gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the
latest exploit for
the product we are shipping targeted for RHEL and CentOS. To do so, I want
to equip
gethostbyname()
On 28 February 2015 at 05:49, ANDY KENNEDY andy.kenn...@adtran.com wrote:
I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for
testing with
gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the
latest exploit for
the product we are shipping
On 03/02/2015 10:38 AM, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for
testing with
gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the
latest exploit for
the product we are shipping targeted for RHEL and CentOS. To do so,
On 03/02/2015 11:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/02/2015 10:38 AM, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for
testing with
gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the
latest exploit for
the product we are
On 28 February 2015 at 05:49, ANDY KENNEDY andy.kenn...@adtran.com wrote:
I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for
testing with
gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the
latest exploit for
the product we are shipping targeted
On 02/27/2015 12:49 PM, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
All,
Please excuse any ignorance in this e-mail as I am not a RH/CentOS/Fedora
user and may
blunder my way through the correct terminology for my request.
No problem.
I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for
All,
Please excuse any ignorance in this e-mail as I am not a RH/CentOS/Fedora user
and may
blunder my way through the correct terminology for my request.
I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for
testing with
gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are
On 27 February 2015 at 13:49, ANDY KENNEDY andy.kenn...@adtran.com wrote:
All,
Please excuse any ignorance in this e-mail as I am not a RH/CentOS/Fedora
user and may
blunder my way through the correct terminology for my request.
I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 06:49:23PM +, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
But, when looking through the source code for this version on the CentOS
servers I only see:
http://vault.centos.org/6.6/updates/Source/SPackages/
[ ] glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.src.rpm27-Jan-2015 23:13 15M
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:49:23 +
ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
Compiled on a Linux 2.6.32 system on 2015-01-27.
glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.src.rpm 27-Jan-2015 23:13 15M
The date on that rpm matches the compiled on date that you posted.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~
18 matches
Mail list logo
