I just had an IBM in a remote location with a hardware raid1 have both
drives go bad. With local machines I probably would have caught it
from the drive light before the 2nd one died... What is the state of
the art in linux software monitoring for this? Long ago when that
box was set up I
On 25/08/14 04:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I just had an IBM in a remote location with a hardware raid1 have both
drives go bad. With local machines I probably would have caught it
from the drive light before the 2nd one died... What is the state of
the art in linux software monitoring for
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 16:03
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Hardware raid health?
I just had an IBM in a remote location with a hardware raid1 have
On 25/08/14 04:11 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 16:03
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Hardware raid health?
I just had an IBM
On 8/25/2014 1:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I just had an IBM in a remote location with a hardware raid1 have both
drives go bad. With local machines I probably would have caught it
from the drive light before the 2nd one died... What is the state of
the art in linux software monitoring for
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Hardware raid health?
I just had an IBM in a remote location with a hardware
raid1 have both
drives go bad. With local machines I probably would have caught it
from the drive light before the 2nd one died... What is
the state of
the art in linux
On 2014-08-25, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
IF megacli64 works for this raid controller, then I tweaked some python
scripts I found online and use these two scripts.. these live in
/root/bin as they are only for root's use.
They can probably go anywhere, since a normal user
7 matches
Mail list logo
