> I've got a WD My Passport Ultra 1TB (USB) plugged into my router...
Have you gone to the drive's web interface on your local net? (http://[ip
of drive]) It has been my experience that these network storage devices
typically come pre-configured for smb/sftp/(and one other i can't
remember). Th
If your CentOS machine has graphics (Gnome etc), you should be able to point
your file browser at smb://ip_address/share_name
> On 23 Mar 2018, at 23:22, Christian, Mark wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 22:57 +, Tom Bishop wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 5:50 PM Eugene Poole wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 22:57 +, Tom Bishop wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 5:50 PM Eugene Poole wrote:
>
> > I've got a WD My Passport Ultra 1TB (USB) plugged into my router and I
> > have 4 Windows machines, all running Windows 7, and all 4 machines can
> > see the device as drive 'Y'. I use t
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 5:50 PM Eugene Poole wrote:
> I've got a WD My Passport Ultra 1TB (USB) plugged into my router and I
> have 4 Windows machines, all running Windows 7, and all 4 machines can
> see the device as drive 'Y'. I use this device several ways, i.e. all my
> Windows machines use the
I've got a WD My Passport Ultra 1TB (USB) plugged into my router and I
have 4 Windows machines, all running Windows 7, and all 4 machines can
see the device as drive 'Y'. I use this device several ways, i.e. all my
Windows machines use the same Firefox bookmarks and cookies
I've got 5 machines
try to start gnome-session-properties and uncheck launching at-spi d-bus
launcher at system startup
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> I have a laptop that hangs up on shutdown saying that at-spi-bus-launcher
> is still running.
>
> Since I have no use for at-spi-bus-launcher an
I have a laptop that hangs up on shutdown saying that at-spi-bus-launcher is
still running.
Since I have no use for at-spi-bus-launcher anyway, I would like to get rid of
it, but attempting to remove the at-spi2-core rpm wants to remove 99% of my
desktop as well.
The only way that I can see to
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 03:53:41PM -0700, Kay Schenk wrote:
> All my users are starting X with startx and the default .xinitrc. Is
> this the problem?
Yes. It's typically set up in /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession, and startx
doesn't use it.
--
Jonathan Billings
I did some research and see a LOT of folks would love to get rid of
their .xsession-errors file and I'm in the opposite situation -- where
is mine? Do I have to install or enable something special to get this back.
All my users are starting X with startx and the default .xinitrc. Is
this the probl
Thank you Les, I will try it.
Kosuke Yagi
2014/07/28 23:43、Les Mikesell :
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Kosuke Yagi wrote:
>>
>> Does any one success to connect CentOS7 via xdmcp?
>> I've tried, but not yet succeeded.
>>
>> 1) CentOS7 with Development and Creative workstation
>> 2) Dis
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Kosuke Yagi wrote:
>
> Does any one success to connect CentOS7 via xdmcp?
> I've tried, but not yet succeeded.
>
> 1) CentOS7 with Development and Creative workstation
> 2) Disabled SELinux by editing /etc/selinux/config
> 3) Disabled firewalld by systemctl disable
Dear all,
Does any one success to connect CentOS7 via xdmcp?
I've tried, but not yet succeeded.
1) CentOS7 with Development and Creative workstation
2) Disabled SELinux by editing /etc/selinux/config
3) Disabled firewalld by systemctl disable firewalld
4) Enabled xdmcp by editing /etc/gdm/custom.
On 23/12/2013 5:43 PM, Peter Eckel wrote:
>> But, When my server handle a big file ..
>> Maybe, It's use more Ram memory.
> No. Don't worry.
Thank You friend.
I understood!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf
> But, When my server handle a big file ..
> Maybe, It's use more Ram memory.
No. Don't worry.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cent
On 19/12/2013 10:05 PM, ken wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 06:31 PM Peter wrote:
>> On 12/19/2013 12:33 AM, JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>>> But, When my server handle a big file ..
>>> Maybe, It's use more Ram memory.
>>> so, what you thinking now ? :D
>> I'm thinking that you have no idea what you're talking ab
On 12/18/2013 06:31 PM Peter wrote:
> On 12/19/2013 12:33 AM, JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>>
>> But, When my server handle a big file ..
>> Maybe, It's use more Ram memory.
>> so, what you thinking now ? :D
>
> I'm thinking that you have no idea what you're talking about and you're
> trying to solve a non
On 12/19/2013 12:33 AM, JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>
> But, When my server handle a big file ..
> Maybe, It's use more Ram memory.
> so, what you thinking now ? :D
I'm thinking that you have no idea what you're talking about and you're
trying to solve a non-issue.
Peter
__
On 19/12/2013 1:44 AM, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2013-12-18, JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>>
>> My PostFix server is running good now,
>> but, When I send many email from my server,
>> PostFix make log file big. now my log file is 30MB .. :(
>> so, I want to disable log reporting it.
>> Just, can you tell
On 2013-12-18, JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>
>
> My PostFix server is running good now,
> but, When I send many email from my server,
> PostFix make log file big. now my log file is 30MB .. :(
> so, I want to disable log reporting it.
> Just, can you tell me, can i make it disable ?
> If yes, Please tell
On 12/18/2013 06:03 AM JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>
> On 18/12/2013 4:57 PM, ken wrote:
>> On 12/18/2013 05:47 AM Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>> Am 18.12.2013 11:26, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
My PostFix server is running good now,
but, When I send many email from my server,
PostFix make log file b
On 18/12/2013 5:23 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 11:49 PM, JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>> If my file is very big, do i loss my server performance ?
>> My vps is 512 MB RAM.. So ?
> You're newer to a lot more than just Linux if you think that log files
> use up RAM.
>
> RAM != Disk space.
>
>
> Peter
>
On 12/18/2013 11:49 PM, JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>
> If my file is very big, do i loss my server performance ?
> My vps is 512 MB RAM.. So ?
You're newer to a lot more than just Linux if you think that log files
use up RAM.
RAM != Disk space.
Peter
___
C
Hi,
Wednesday, December 18, 2013, 11:26:26 AM, you wrote:
> When I send many email from my server, PostFix make log file big.
> now my log file is 30MB .. :(
> so, I want to disable log reporting it.
You shouldn't disable logging, you should run logrotate so that it
takes care of old log files a
On 18/12/2013 4:57 PM, ken wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 05:47 AM Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> Am 18.12.2013 11:26, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
>>> My PostFix server is running good now,
>>> but, When I send many email from my server,
>>> PostFix make log file big. now my log file is 30MB .. :(
>>> so, I want to
On 12/18/2013 05:47 AM Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 18.12.2013 11:26, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
>> My PostFix server is running good now,
>> but, When I send many email from my server,
>> PostFix make log file big. now my log file is 30MB .. :(
>> so, I want to disable log reporting it.
>> Just, can yo
On 18/12/2013 4:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 18.12.2013 11:26, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
>> On 18/12/2013 4:00 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>> Am 18.12.2013 09:31, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
How can I disable PostFix maillog ( /var/log/maillog ) ?
>>> May I ask why you like to do so? That's not a
Am 18.12.2013 11:26, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
> My PostFix server is running good now,
> but, When I send many email from my server,
> PostFix make log file big. now my log file is 30MB .. :(
> so, I want to disable log reporting it.
> Just, can you tell me, can i make it disable ?
> If yes, Please te
On 18/12/2013 4:00 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 18.12.2013 09:31, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
>> How can I disable PostFix maillog ( /var/log/maillog ) ?
> May I ask why you like to do so? That's not a clever idea.
>
> If you don't want to run Postfix, then switch it off. If you run it on
> purpose,
Am 18.12.2013 09:31, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
> How can I disable PostFix maillog ( /var/log/maillog ) ?
May I ask why you like to do so? That's not a clever idea.
If you don't want to run Postfix, then switch it off. If you run it on
purpose, then you should have a possibility to see what it does.
How can I disable PostFix maillog ( /var/log/maillog ) ?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 07/29/2013 08:53 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Gstreamer depends on later glib and gtk that
> CentOS 6 does not have.
>
> Suggestions?
What's wrong with the gstreamer in CentOS already?
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
Gstreamer depends on later glib and gtk that
CentOS 6 does not have.
Suggestions?
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Nov 19, 2012, at 11:14, I wrote:
> We use automounted user home directories on our CentOS 6.3 desktops, and on
> the desktops on which we start apache, I have noticed that all 900+ home
> directories listed in NIS get (and stay!) mounted. If I don't start apache,
> this doesn't happen.
Aft
On Nov 19, 2012, at 16:43, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> For me, it's a gnome thing, not apache.
Well, it's a combination of both. Gnome by itself doesn't do this; it only
happens when you add apache to the mix.
I set the init level to 3 on one of my test systems and rebooted. I also
configured
Alfred von Campe wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 15:37, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Ah, no. If it's running GUI, which none of our servers are, it wants
>> *everyone* who isn't nologin mounted. Including people who've never been
>> on that machine, nor will be.
>
> When you say "*it* wants", are you
On Nov 19, 2012, at 15:37, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ah, no. If it's running GUI, which none of our servers are, it wants
> *everyone* who isn't nologin mounted. Including people who've never been
> on that machine, nor will be.
When you say "*it* wants", are you referring to apache or the GUI ma
On Nov 19, 2012, at 15:22, Mike Burger wrote:
> Unless you've removed it from each and every Linux system (desktop
> included), /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf contains the following:
I have removed this on one of our test systems, rebooted, and it's still
automounting all home directories.
Alfred
On 11/19/12 12:37 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ah, no. If it's running GUI, which none of our servers are, it wants
> *everyone* who isn't nologin mounted. Including people who've never been
> on that machine, nor will be.
as an aside... while I don't use automounted home directories anymore,
Nux! wrote:
> On 19.11.2012 20:00, Alfred von Campe wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 2012, at 12:02, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I've also seen gnome want to mount *everybody*
>>
>> FWIW, I also have this issue (mounting all home directories) on one
>> of our servers. But only those running 6.3; the syst
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 11:20, Nux! wrote:
>
>> Instead of omitting LoadModule you could try to leave it enabled, but
>> specify a different userdir, i.e. not under /home.
>
> There is no reference to /home anywhere that I can find. I assume that
> apache just expands ~ to list all home directories
On 19.11.2012 20:00, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 12:02, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Not the way I'd do it: where I've worked, and work, we have apache
>> running
>> on servers, so we can guarantee their working ->correctly<-, and the
>> developers have directories that they can
On Nov 19, 2012, at 12:02, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Not the way I'd do it: where I've worked, and work, we have apache running
> on servers, so we can guarantee their working ->correctly<-, and the
> developers have directories that they can put things in and test that way.
Well, all we need to
Alfred von Campe wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 11:29, Mike Burger wrote:
>
>> If I may...why are you running Apache on your desktops?
>
> The products we develop need access to a web server, and some developers
> need a web server to test with. It's all just on our internal network;
> nothing is ex
On Nov 19, 2012, at 11:20, Nux! wrote:
> Instead of omitting LoadModule you could try to leave it enabled, but
> specify a different userdir, i.e. not under /home.
There is no reference to /home anywhere that I can find. I assume that apache
just expands ~ to list all home directories and then
On Nov 19, 2012, at 11:29, Mike Burger wrote:
> If I may...why are you running Apache on your desktops?
The products we develop need access to a web server, and some developers need a
web server to test with. It's all just on our internal network; nothing is
exposed to the Internet.
Alfred
_
> We use automounted user home directories on our CentOS 6.3 desktops, and
> on the desktops on which we start apache, I have noticed that all 900+
> home directories listed in NIS get (and stay!) mounted. If I don't start
> apache, this doesn't happen.
>
> We don't need access to home directories
On 19.11.2012 16:14, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> We use automounted user home directories on our CentOS 6.3 desktops,
> and on the desktops on which we start apache, I have noticed that all
> 900+ home directories listed in NIS get (and stay!) mounted. If I
> don't start apache, this doesn't happen.
We use automounted user home directories on our CentOS 6.3 desktops, and on the
desktops on which we start apache, I have noticed that all 900+ home
directories listed in NIS get (and stay!) mounted. If I don't start apache,
this doesn't happen.
We don't need access to home directories from ap
Hello,
I have a server working on centos 5.7-64 minimal installation. I have
3 separate physical drives:
120 gb ssd, 2x 3tb disks for storage.
My linux installation is on ssd disk, and I want to make raid 1 for
these two 3tb disks and store data, like under /mnt/data.
Can you please tell me the
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:08 AM, erikmccaskey64 wrote:
>
> I just can find any solution...
> Please help!
> thanks..
What OS are you running? What hardware? Details might help (since
you cross-posted this to more than one OS group...).
___
CentOS mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/25/2011 05:11 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: erikmccaskey64
>> I just can find any solution...
>
> Dunno if selinux could do this, but you could also try to run wine
> from a specific user and then use iptables with --uid-owner to block
> access
From: erikmccaskey64
> I just can find any solution...
Dunno if selinux could do this, but you could also try to run wine
from a specific user and then use iptables with --uid-owner to block access...?
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
I just can find any solution...
Please help!
thanks..
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: wang suya
>I tryed "restorecon -Rv -n /var/www/html" but "bash: restorecon: command
>not found"
> message show up. Why?
Did you try as root?
If you did, did you su - instead of su?
Tip: locate restorecon
JD
___
CentOS mailing li
Hi Timo
I tryed "restorecon -Rv -n /var/www/html" but "bash: restorecon: command not
found"
message show up. Why?
Thanks
Wang
>thus wang suya spake:
>> Hi Timo
>>
>>Thank you but I tryed "yum install php-5.1.6-27.el5"
>> it said that "Package php-5.1.6-27.el5.i386 already installed and
thus wang suya spake:
> Hi Timo
>
>Thank you but I tryed "yum install php-5.1.6-27.el5"
> it said that "Package php-5.1.6-27.el5.i386 already installed and latest
> version Nothing to do"
> Do you know why?
Yes -- sorry, I need coffee, I didn't see it already was installed on
your machine.
Hi Timo
Thank you but I tryed "yum install php-5.1.6-27.el5"
it said that "Package php-5.1.6-27.el5.i386 already installed and latest
version Nothing to do"
Do you know why?
Thanks!
Wang
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>thus wang suya spake:
>> Hi Timo
>>Thank you very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus wang suya spake:
> Hi Timo
>Thank you very much for answer my question
> it comes:
> php-mbstring-5.1.6-27.el5
> php-common-5.1.6-27.el5
> php-5.1.6-27.el5
> php-ldap-5.1.6-27.el5
> php-cli-5.1.6-27.el5
You need to install
php-5.1.6-27.el5
Hi Timo
Thank you very much for answer my question
it comes:
php-mbstring-5.1.6-27.el5
php-common-5.1.6-27.el5
php-5.1.6-27.el5
php-ldap-5.1.6-27.el5
php-cli-5.1.6-27.el5
do you know what information for these?
Thanks
Wang
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>thus wang suya spa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus wang suya spake:
>
>Dear Everyone
>
> I met truble to setup centos Server. I installed centos lastest
> version, then
> installed apache lastest version and yum installed php lastest version. And
> looked
> at internet information to
Dear Everyone
I met truble to setup centos Server. I installed centos lastest version,
then
installed apache lastest version and yum installed php lastest version. And
looked
at internet information to set up httpd.conf, then I run
http://localhost/test.php
but forbbiton 403 error re
Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:53:49 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>
> Random thought (total guess): What happens if you use split on the zip
> file and try to get info zip to think it is a multi-part archive?
A multi-part archive is not the same as a single archive split
> The problem with x86 (32-bit) is that there's two different memory limits.
> The total amoumt of accessible memory is 4GB (2^32 Bytes) but the total
> amount of memory per process is limited to 2GB. That means that even on 64-
> bit system and more than 4GB of total memory a 32-bit process cannot
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:39:57PM -0500, Brian wrote:
> > And thus my question; does anyone _know_ of a Unix tool that can
> > access
> http://www.info-zip.org/UnZip.html
>
> Latest Release
> New features in UnZip 6.0, released 20 April 2009:
Hmm, interesting.
However, I think I found a sim
On Mar 13, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
> And thus my question; does anyone _know_ of a Unix tool that can
> access
> this?
---
http://www.info-zip.org/UnZip.html
Latest Release
New features in UnZip 6.0, released 20 April 2009:
• Support PKWARE ZIP64 extensions, allo
Martin Jungowski wrote:
> The problem with x86 (32-bit) is that there's two different memory limits.
> The total amoumt of accessible memory is 4GB (2^32 Bytes) but the total
> amount of memory per process is limited to 2GB.
actually, thats 3GB per-process limit in 32bit Linux.
___
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:49:06PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > I have a zip file. ?It is over 2Gb in size:
> > This is because the info-zip utilities can't handle ZIP files over 2Gb in
> > size.
> > Anyone have any recommendatio
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:39:28AM +, Martin Jungowski wrote:
> The total amoumt of accessible memory is 4GB (2^32 Bytes) but the total
> amount of memory per process is limited to 2GB. That means that even on 64-
> bit system and more than 4GB of total memory a 32-bit process cannot
> access
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> I have a zip file. It is over 2Gb in size:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 sweh sweh 2383956582 Mar 13 13:44 test.zip
>
> The standard "unzip" program barfs:
> % unzip -l test.zip
> Archive: test.zip
> End-of-central-directory signature not found.
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 07:28:11PM -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
> Random thought (total guess): What happens if you use split on the zip
> file and try to get info zip to think it is a multi-part archive?
The manpage says multi-part archives aren't supported, and in tests it
doesn't look like it e
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:20:43 -0500 Stephen Harris wrote:
> Nope; standard 32bit Windows XP vs 32bit CentOS 5
>
> (bit-width shouldn't matter 32bit OS's can handle large files for over a
> decade)
The problem with x86 (32-bit) is that there's two different memory limits.
The total amoumt of acces
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:31:35PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 19:20 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > (bit-width shouldn't matter 32bit OS's can handle large files for over
> > a decade)
>
> tell that to Outlook
That's an application, not an OS (and Outlook 2007 handle
At Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:53:49 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> I have a zip file. It is over 2Gb in size:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 sweh sweh 2383956582 Mar 13 13:44 test.zip
>
> The standard "unzip" program barfs:
> % unzip -l test.zip
> Archive: test.zip
> End-of-central-directory signa
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 19:20 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:07:57PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 18:53 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > > I have a zip file. It is over 2Gb in size:
> > > The standard "unzip" program barfs:
> > > This is because the
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:07:57PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 18:53 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > I have a zip file. It is over 2Gb in size:
> > The standard "unzip" program barfs:
> > This is because the info-zip utilities can't handle ZIP files over 2Gb in
> > size.
> >
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 18:53 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote:
> I have a zip file. It is over 2Gb in size:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 sweh sweh 2383956582 Mar 13 13:44 test.zip
>
> The standard "unzip" program barfs:
> % unzip -l test.zip
> Archive: test.zip
> End-of-central-directory signature not fo
I have a zip file. It is over 2Gb in size:
-rw-r--r-- 1 sweh sweh 2383956582 Mar 13 13:44 test.zip
The standard "unzip" program barfs:
% unzip -l test.zip
Archive: test.zip
End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not
a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk o
Am Montag, den 09.11.2009, 15:00 +0100 schrieb Dhiraj Chatpar:
> I am not able to install this which i used to in debian.. i am now
> using centos. can you please tell me how to install apt-get install
> libnet-server-perl on centos?
>
> PLEASE HELP
>
>
man yum
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/yu
I am not able to install this which i used to in debian.. i am now using
centos. can you please tell me how to install apt-get install
libnet-server-perl on centos?
PLEASE HELP
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
Sam Acosta wrote:
> Thanks Kai,
>
> Yeah, the ultimate thing I can do is to reboot.
>
> I do still have one problem with the High Availability feature of CentOS
> with Asterisk.
>
> Still in progress exploring the solution.
>
> Good day.
I rarely use server consoles directly after they are i
From: Sam Acosta
> But how could I reload the grub config file after boot. Of course, I just
> could easily re-start our server without prior scheduling...
Maybe check SVGATextMode
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.ce
>
>From: Sam Acosta
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Sent: Mon, November 9, 2009 7:06:42 AM
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] How Can I change CentOS CLI Screen Resolution to smaller
>text (without GUI)?
>
>Thanks for the inputs guys...
>
>
>But how could I reload the grub c
Thanks Kai,
Yeah, the ultimate thing I can do is to reboot.
I do still have one problem with the High Availability feature of CentOS
with Asterisk.
Still in progress exploring the solution.
Good day.
Sam
WEB: www.SamAcosta.net * E-MAIL: m...@samacosta.info
-
Sam Acosta wrote on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:06:42 +0800:
> But how could I reload the grub config file after boot.
You can't.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing l
Thanks for the inputs guys...
But how could I reload the grub config file after boot. Of course, I just
could easily re-start our server without prior scheduling...
Sam
WEB: www.SamAcosta.net * E-MAIL: m...@samacosta.info
-
NOTE: The information contained in this
On Sunday 08 November 2009 20:59, Sam Acosta wrote:
> I'd like to view the Screen resolution in smaller text on my server
> terminal. The server is not installed with any GUI so it's in plain text
> mode.
Try adding 'vga=795' to the end of the kernel line in grub.conf file.
--
Regards
Rob
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to view the Screen resolution in smaller text on my server
> terminal. The server is not installed with any GUI so it's in plain text
> mode.
Google for linux vga modes
Barry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cen
Hi,
I'd like to view the Screen resolution in smaller text on my server
terminal. The server is not installed with any GUI so it's in plain text
mode.
Thanks.
Sam
-
NOTE: The information contained in this document and its attachments, if
any, may be confidential
On 10/7/09, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Now I got another modem but this modem is hardcore the DSL login
>> How can I not use this DSL login and use linux box to ppp0e login and pw
>
> I've just gotten DSL for the first time myself (I've had cable
> before)...but the DSL modem I got from Verizon
up my phone service, I'll have the outside line fixed so I have
dialtone
mark
>
> --- On Mon, 10/5/09, Robert Heller wrote:
>
>> From: Robert Heller
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] how can i configure linux as ppp
>> To: "CentOS mailing list"
>>
Now I got another modem but this modem is hardcore the DSL login
How can I not use this DSL login and use linux box to ppp0e login and pw
thank you
--- On Mon, 10/5/09, Robert Heller wrote:
> From: Robert Heller
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] how can i configure linux as ppp
> To
At Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:21:59 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> My DSL modem has problem. I would like to use linux as ppp.
> How can I configure it?
Well, you need ppp and wvdial installed (should be on your install
disk(s)).
With these installed, you can configure it wi
Hi
My DSL modem has problem. I would like to use linux as ppp.
How can I configure it?
Thank you
__
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo!
Answers and share what you know at http://ca.ans
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>
>> It has nothing todo with "he doesn't want anyone elses parts in the
>> system he sells and warranties because he doesn't want to be be
>> responsible for fixing ensuing problems. he's selling stuff he
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
It has nothing todo with "he doesn't want anyone elses parts in the
system he sells and warranties because he doesn't want to be be
responsible for fixing ensuing problems. he's selling stuff he knows
works"
I'm confused. Aren't you the same person who just put together so
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:17 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>
>> I got the components cheaper from another supplier /
>> importer / retailer than from Dell directly. And really, how can
>> KingMax RAM or Seagate HDD's from one supplier be better than from
>> anot
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:28 PM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 18:38 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>
>
>> I'm sitting with a very expensive paper weight right now, and I don't
>> know what todo. The same websites are running very well on a machine
>> with a Gi
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I'm sitting with a very expensive paper weight right now, and I don't
know what todo. The same websites are running very well on a machine
with a Gigabyte G31MX-S motherboard + 4GB DDRII 800 RAM + C2D 6750
CPU. This is what baffles me, how can the same load on a slower
machine
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I got the components cheaper from another supplier /
importer / retailer than from Dell directly. And really, how can
KingMax RAM or Seagate HDD's from one supplier be better than from
another supplier? I only use the recommended types, i.e ECC (non
registered), and Seagate RAI
Rob Townley wrote:
> i have some several year old DL360's and ML370's and love em -
> especially hw raid, but i my local supplier hasn't had any for several
> months. Uptil a few months ago, password reset info on ebay was sent
> in the clear, so i have a very hard time trusting ebay. It would b
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
