Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Gilbert Sebenste
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:44 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Gilbert Sebenste
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:44 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
On one
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Michael A. Peters
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 8:57 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Minor version upgrades (eg 5.2
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Yum upgrade or yum update? What's the take on that one here on the list?
Oh God, Not Again!
upgrade and update do exactly the same, except if *YOU* yourself turned
off obsoletes=1 in /etc/yum.conf. There is *NO* difference.
Ralph
pgpVyeA6g4iwZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Mike A. Harris
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:31 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
I did the update by yum -y update and for whatever
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Christian Wahlgren
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:37 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
2009/4/1 Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
d2009/4/1 Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
The caution about first updating glibc (?) is important. I recall from
the update to 5.2, there is a difference, between yum upgrade and
yum update.
No, there is not. Except if you fiddled with the configuration and
Christian Wahlgren wrote:
But when I looked in the Release Notes for CentOS-5.3, it doesn't mention
yum update glibc at all, so maybe that upstream bug has been solved
for CentOS-5.3?
Ummm. It does. In the Known Issues section.
Ralph
pgpSP072szgj9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On one mirror that I tried, at least.
So, is it live yet? :-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
On one mirror that I tried, at least.
So, is it live yet? :-)
Almost. Another several more hours before they all sync, and then we're
good to go.
BTW, how does this work? If I want to go from 5.2 to 5.3, can I just
type yum upgrade? If so, what
On 31-Mar-09, at 10:44 AM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
On one mirror that I tried, at least.
So, is it live yet? :-)
Almost. Another several more hours before they all sync, and then
we're
good to go.
BTW, how does this work? If I want to go
thus Gilbert Sebenste spake:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
On one mirror that I tried, at least.
So, is it live yet? :-)
Yap. I'm seeding ISO images for four hours already.
My machine at home (this one) is 5.3 already (clean install from DVD):
[t...@dragon ~]$ uname -a
Linux
on 3-31-2009 10:41 AM Florin Andrei spake the following:
On one mirror that I tried, at least.
So, is it live yet? :-)
The announcement will tell you if it is live. Prior updates seem to have been
done like this;
Packages and ISO's are synced to mirrors. Maybe packages first, then ISO's.
At Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:44:00 -0500 (CDT) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
On one mirror that I tried, at least.
So, is it live yet? :-)
Almost. Another several more hours before they all sync, and then we're
good to go.
For 5.x to 5.3, you must:
# yum update glibc
# yum update
You need to update glibc first (upstream bug I believe).
d
if this is so, is there a link to this on upstream website that someone
already has booked?
please share
- rh
___
RobertH wrote:
For 5.x to 5.3, you must:
# yum update glibc
# yum update
You need to update glibc first (upstream bug I believe).
if this is so, is there a link to this on upstream website that someone
already has booked?
On 31-Mar-09, at 11:46 AM, RobertH wrote:
For 5.x to 5.3, you must:
# yum update glibc
# yum update
You need to update glibc first (upstream bug I believe).
d
if this is so, is there a link to this on upstream website that
someone
already has booked?
please share
- rh
I
On 31-Mar-09, at 12:15 PM, dnk wrote:
On 31-Mar-09, at 11:46 AM, RobertH wrote:
For 5.x to 5.3, you must:
# yum update glibc
# yum update
You need to update glibc first (upstream bug I believe).
d
if this is so, is there a link to this on upstream website that
someone
already has
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:44:00 -0500 (CDT) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
On one mirror that I tried, at least.
So, is it live yet? :-)
Almost. Another several
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
You don't need to change anything. 'yum update' will update things,
within a given major release (eg 4.x or 5.x). It will happen
automagically. Going from 4.x to 5.x requires using the installer (eg
the ISOs and a reboot with the installer CD/DVD). I
On Mar 31, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Gilbert Sebenste seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu
wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
You don't need to change anything. 'yum update' will update things,
within a given major release (eg 4.x or 5.x). It will happen
automagically. Going from 4.x to
21 matches
Mail list logo
