On 24/9/10 2:16 PM, "Warren Young" wrote:
> On 9/24/2010 10:54 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>> Until Cygwin's developers decide the join the rest of the window's
>> universe in having an *uninstaller* it will remain "not installed -
>> ever" on many people's systems, including mine. It is completely
On 9/24/2010 10:54 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> Until Cygwin's developers decide the join the rest of the window's
> universe in having an *uninstaller* it will remain "not installed -
> ever" on many people's systems, including mine. It is completely
> unacceptable that it is happy to install, but
On 24 September 2010 18:04, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> No Windows functionalities are lost by installing Cygwin.
> Cygwin has the SAME uninstall that Windows does: install CentOS.
cwrsync comes with an uninstallable package and works OK, makes
copying loads of files across Windows boxen bearable.
- Original Message -
| On 9/24/2010 12:08 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
| > It was funny, but it would have been more efficient to use tar over
| > netcat instead of CP or rsync to initially populate the directory.
| > It would be a steady data stream to the network and wouldn't beat up
| >
On 9/24/2010 12:08 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> It was funny, but it would have been more efficient to use tar over netcat
> instead of CP or rsync to initially populate the directory. It would be a
> steady data stream to the network and wouldn't beat up on the file system as
> bad as rsync w
On 9/24/2010 11:54 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
>>> On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoeler
>>> wrote:
Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :)
>>> Although I read the article
It was funny, but it would have been more efficient to use tar over netcat
instead of CP or rsync to initially populate the directory. It would be a
steady data stream to the network and wouldn't beat up on the file system as
bad as rsync would.
Good read none the less. :)
- Original Mess
> > Until Cygwin's developers decide the join the rest of the window's
> > universe in having an *uninstaller* it will remain "not installed -
> > ever" on many people's systems, including mine.
>
> IMO, a windows system with Cygwin and Cygwin tools isn't
> really a Windows system anymore;
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 09:54 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 09/24/2010 08:37 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> > On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoeler
> > wrote:
> >> Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
> >> their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger
On 09/24/2010 08:37 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
>> Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
>> their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :)
>>
> Although I read the article with
> May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/
VERY nice! Thank you for the link!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 9/24/2010 10:37 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>> Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
>> their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :)
> Although I read the article with some amusement,
On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
> their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :)
Although I read the article with some amusement, I have to wonder
what's wrong with rsync (has a Win
with a post-it
note sayin - This is why I use linux :)
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Timo Schoeler
Sent: 24 September 2010 14:23
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] In the press, once again
May be a little bit off
* Timo Schoeler (timo.schoe...@riscworks.net) wrote:
> May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/
>
> Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
> their own tools are not able to handle co
thus Tom Bishop spake:
> +1 Just Awesome.ROFL.too funny :)
>
>
> Thanks for the link
Maybe stuff for then next newsletter...?
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Timo Schoeler
> wrote:
>
>> May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.u
+1 Just Awesome.ROFL.too funny :)
Thanks for the link
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Timo Schoeler
wrote:
> May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/
>
> Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS mach
May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/
Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :)
Cheers,
Timo
18 matches
Mail list logo
