K, clear.
Still very much appreciative of your experience and insight.
I'm a wannabe who never has enough time amongst my duties to get my
sys-admin skills tight.
Cheers,
Mike
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:36 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
> On 17 Apr 2015 13:04, "Mike" <1100...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>
On 17 Apr 2015 13:04, "Mike" <1100...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:46 AM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
>
> > It wasn't the bind package directly but rather an issue with the libkrb5
> > libraries.
> >
> > This is the specific bug that fixed the issue:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.c
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:46 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
> It wasn't the bind package directly but rather an issue with the libkrb5
> libraries.
>
> This is the specific bug that fixed the issue:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087068
>
> I'll get the samba wiki updated to make this
On 17 Apr 2015 00:42, "Mike" <1100...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:03 PM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
>
> > This was required for kerberos secured updates prior to el7.1 and el6.6
...
> >
> > The problem in the underlying kerberos libraries was resolved so that
> > kerberos based upd
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:03 PM, James Hogarth
wrote:
> This was required for kerberos secured updates prior to el7.1 and el6.6 ...
>
> The problem in the underlying kerberos libraries was resolved so that
> kerberos based updates worked with gss again and spnego doesn't need to be
> compiled in.
On 16 Apr 2015 14:29, "Johnny Hughes" wrote:
>
> On 04/16/2015 06:33 AM, Mike wrote:
> > Hi Johnny,
> >
> > Thank you for your response. I thought to choose the sernet package
> > because of the following stated in Samba Readme:
> >
> > Samba packages shipped in some distributions like e. g. Fedo
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/16/2015 06:33 AM, Mike wrote:
>
>
> BUT .. If I was going to solve this problem, I would do so asking the
> sernet guys and I would rebuild the "bind" sources in CentOS with the
> proper configure switches so it would likely still meet
On 04/16/2015 06:33 AM, Mike wrote:
> Hi Johnny,
>
> Thank you for your response. I thought to choose the sernet package
> because of the following stated in Samba Readme:
>
> Samba packages shipped in some distributions like e. g. Fedora, RHEL may
> not be able to be used as Samba AD DC, becaus
Hi Johnny,
Thank you for your response. I thought to choose the sernet package
because of the following stated in Samba Readme:
Samba packages shipped in some distributions like e. g. Fedora, RHEL may
not be able to be used as Samba AD DC, because the distribution relies on
MIT Kerberos which is
On 04/16/2015 12:53 AM, Mike wrote:
> CentOS 7.1503 installed.
> Installed Samba 4 from sernet: Version 4.1.17-SerNet-RedHat-11.el7 (to be
> configured).
>
> The samba wiki Readme First page states, "Some distributions like . . . Red
> Hat Enterprise Linux (and clones), ship BIND9 packages with di
CentOS 7.1503 installed.
Installed Samba 4 from sernet: Version 4.1.17-SerNet-RedHat-11.el7 (to be
configured).
The samba wiki Readme First page states, "Some distributions like . . . Red
Hat Enterprise Linux (and clones), ship BIND9 packages with disabled
GSS-SPNEGO option, which is required for
11 matches
Mail list logo
