On May 9, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 1:14 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 05/09/2016 11:01 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> Thanks Gordon! Yes, I know, ZFS, of course. I hear it as you definitely
>>> will use zfs for "bricks" of distributed file system, right?
>
On 05/09/2016 11:46 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Yes, ZFS, and thanks a lot! For distributed file system "brick" boxes ZFS
(btrfs,...) may be a must, but only if distributed filesystem doesn't have
its own mechanism ensuring file integrity, right?
Ignore distributed filesystems for a moment. Is
On Mon, May 9, 2016 1:14 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 11:01 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> Thanks Gordon! Yes, I know, ZFS, of course. I hear it as you definitely
>> will use zfs for "bricks" of distributed file system, right?
>
>
> You could, I suppose, but I don't think its use case i
On 05/09/2016 11:01 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Thanks Gordon! Yes, I know, ZFS, of course. I hear it as you definitely
will use zfs for "bricks" of distributed file system, right?
You could, I suppose, but I don't think its use case is limited to
that. There aren't many spaces where I think y
On 05/08/2016 06:51 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
In the
past LSI would be my definite second choice, and 3ware was winning me only
by their transparent web interface.
3ware had a much more pleasant web UI and CLI, but their hardware was
terribly unreliable and their performance was pretty awful,
On Mon, May 9, 2016 11:12 am, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 05/08/2016 06:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> there are really only two choices today, Adaptec and Avago (formerly
>> LSI, they also control the former Areca product line).
>
> I don't believe that is correct. LSI acquired 3ware, and Avago a
On 05/08/2016 06:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
there are really only two choices today, Adaptec and Avago (formerly
LSI, they also control the former Areca product line).
I don't believe that is correct. LSI acquired 3ware, and Avago acquired
LSI. So, Avago owns the 3ware and LSI technology, b
Speaking from experience (I cannot go into detail on this point), and as
Digimer pointed out, LSI seems to be the only choice for enterprise level,
large scale deployments.
If your concern is extremely long term deployments with verifiable data
recovery options, software RAID is the only option, a
On Sun, May 8, 2016 8:42 pm, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/05/16 09:02 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:31 pm, Digimer wrote:
>>> On 08/05/16 08:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive som
On Sun, May 8, 2016 8:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/8/2016 6:10 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> Can we leave this thread just to thoughts I
>> solicited about which of hardware RAID card manufacturers will still
>> exists in close future.
>
>
> predicting the future? yeah, well.
>
>
> there are
On 08/05/16 09:02 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:31 pm, Digimer wrote:
>> On 08/05/16 08:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to
come
in your estimate. First
On 5/8/2016 6:10 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Can we leave this thread just to thoughts I
solicited about which of hardware RAID card manufacturers will still
exists in close future.
predicting the future? yeah, well.
there are really only two choices today, Adaptec and Avago (formerly
LSI, t
On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:55 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/8/2016 5:31 PM, Digimer wrote:
>> "Hardware RAID" can very well include a controller with dedicated parity
>> processing, battery/flash backed write caching and other tangible
>> benefits.
>
> Yes, battery/flash write-back cache provides som
On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:31 pm, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/05/16 08:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to
>>> come
>>> in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have
>>> pas
On 5/8/2016 5:31 PM, Digimer wrote:
"Hardware RAID" can very well include a controller with dedicated parity
processing, battery/flash backed write caching and other tangible benefits.
Yes, battery/flash write-back cache provides some performance benefit in
write intensive workloads.but al
On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:12 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to
>> come
>> in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have
>> passed away. After multiple acquisitions and be
On 08/05/16 08:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to come
>> in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have
>> passed away. After multiple acquisitions and becoming part
On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to come
in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have
passed away. After multiple acquisitions and becoming part of LSI and
getting bought with LSI, it probably bec
Dear Experts,
one of the RAID threads today prompted me ask everybody.
Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to come
in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have
passed away. After multiple acquisitions and becoming part of LSI and
getting boug
19 matches
Mail list logo
