On Sunday 31 August 2008 22:31, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >We should be talking live. Why don't your join the #centos-social on
> > freenode so we can chat real time?
>
> Robert,
> Just got back from my trip and reading that Tutorial, it went on to state
> what I now find to be two distinct
>We should be talking live. Why don't your join the #centos-social on freenode
>so we can chat real time?
Robert,
Just got back from my trip and reading that Tutorial, it went on to state
what I now find to be two distinct opposite thoughts. Its says at
http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/chun
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 2:56 AM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where is the correct place to control what traffic is masq'ed out?
> This is what I have, but I was told the Forward chain isn't the right place
> to do this?
>
> iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o $WAN -j MASQUERADE
> i
On Friday 29 August 2008 18:38, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >No port or packet types are needed as everything needs to be MASQed.
>
> Sorry, I wasn't clear. I only want ports 80/443 translated for internal
> clients so I do need a rule of some sorts.
We should be talking live. Why don't your joi
>No port or packet types are needed as everything needs to be MASQed.
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I only want ports 80/443 translated for internal clients
so I do need a rule of some sorts.
Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.c
On Friday 29 August 2008 17:52, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >Postrouting is the correct one. After everything is routed it is MASQ
> > before leaving the interface.
>
> That makes sense, but I am stuck at making the transition, should I simply
> pull the port specifications from my third line i
>Postrouting is the correct one. After everything is routed it is MASQ before
>leaving the interface.
That makes sense, but I am stuck at making the transition, should I simply
pull the port specifications from my third line in the FORWARD chain to the
first line in the POSTROUTING chain?
iptabl
On Friday 29 August 2008 17:26, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Where is the correct place to control what traffic is masq'ed out?
> This is what I have, but I was told the Forward chain isn't the right
> place to do this?
>
> iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o $WAN -j MASQUERADE
> iptables -A FORWAR
Where is the correct place to control what traffic is masq'ed out?
This is what I have, but I was told the Forward chain isn't the right place to
do this?
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o $WAN -j MASQUERADE
iptables -A FORWARD -i $WAN -o $LAN -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j
ACCEPT
iptab
9 matches
Mail list logo
