Re: [CentOS] Keepalived vrrp problem

2015-09-30 Thread Tim Dunphy
Guys, I actually found a solution to this. After much googling I was able to come up with this: vrrp_instance VI_1 { interface eth1 state MASTER virtual_router_id 51 priority 101 # 101 on master, 100 on backup *dont_track_primary* vrrp_unicast_bind 10.40.116.30 # Internal IP

Re: [CentOS] Keepalived vrrp problem

2015-09-29 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Em 29-09-2015 15:03, Gordon Messmer escreveu: On 09/29/2015 09:14 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: And if I do an ifconfig command I see no evidence of an eth1 existing. "ifconfig -a" will show you all of your interfaces. Maybe there is a confusion here. Sounds like Tim thought keepalived would create

Re: [CentOS] Keepalived vrrp problem

2015-09-29 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 09/29/2015 09:14 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: And if I do an ifconfig command I see no evidence of an eth1 existing. "ifconfig -a" will show you all of your interfaces. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ce

Re: [CentOS] Keepalived vrrp problem

2015-09-29 Thread m . roth
Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hey guys, > > I'm trying to install keepalived 1.2.19 on a centos 6.5 machine. I did an > install from source. > > And when I start keepalived this is what I'm seeing in the logs. It's > reporting that the VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Now in FAULT state. Two stupid questions: 1. Why

[CentOS] Keepalived vrrp problem

2015-09-29 Thread Tim Dunphy
Hey guys, I'm trying to install keepalived 1.2.19 on a centos 6.5 machine. I did an install from source. And when I start keepalived this is what I'm seeing in the logs. It's reporting that the VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Now in FAULT state. Here's more of that log entry: Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDB