On 27.04.2012 07:32, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> This time in the "normal" repo or also in testing?
> Greetings, j.
Johan,
I don't think this repo will be related to the CentOS project, so it'll
only live on my server.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
__
This time in the "normal" repo or also in testing?
Greetings, j.
verzonden m.b.v Android
vandaar de beknoptheid.
Nux! schreef:
>On 19.03.2012 11:43, Jake Shipton wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
>> n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>>
>>> Jake,
>>>
>>> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
>>> I see t
On 19.03.2012 11:43, Jake Shipton wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
> n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>
>> Jake,
>>
>> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
>> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
>> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
>> sc
Le ven. 20 avril 2012 19:24:37 CEST, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit:
> On 03/19/2012 11:28 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
> > I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of "official"
> > *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do
> > yum update openoffice, I have to unin
On 03/19/2012 11:28 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
> I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of "official"
> *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do
> yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and
> then install again openoffice (or libreof
Jake Shipton writes:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
> n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>
>> Jake,
>>
>> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
>> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
>> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
>> scale. Care to sha
Philippe Naudin writes:
> Le lun. 19 mars 2012 09:50:21 CET, n...@li.nux.ro a écrit:
>> ...
>> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
>> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale.
>> Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you us
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> Jake,
>
> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
> scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are
Le lun. 19 mars 2012 09:50:21 CET, n...@li.nux.ro a écrit:
> ...
> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale.
> Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any "meta" packages?
One i
Jake Shipton writes:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:33:36 +
> n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5
>> (from Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a:
>> yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*
>
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:33:36 +
n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5
> (from Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a:
> yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*
>
> If you have RPMs from libreo
n...@li.nux.ro writes:
> Johan Vermeulen writes:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
>> * I then have a Selinux module
>> * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea,
>> because I'd have to leave the Testing-r
Johan Vermeulen writes:
> Dear All,
>
> I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
> * I then have a Selinux module
> * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea,
> because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
>
> I tried installi
On 03/05/2012 04:45 PM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
>
>> I have been having OpenOffice 3.2 for EL 5.x in my repo since it's
>> release, by unpacking it in my repo folder, but I think desktop
>> integration needed some work.
>>
>> It is much easier to install on several syste
Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
> I have been having OpenOffice 3.2 for EL 5.x in my repo since it's
> release, by unpacking it in my repo folder, but I think desktop
> integration needed some work.
>
> It is much easier to install on several systems from repository. And I
> created virtual packag
On 02/28/2012 09:42 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Mon, February 27, 2012 12:10, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>> Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
>>
>>> Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All
>>> that is
>>> necessary is for several people use packages from
>>> testing repo and
>>> report th
On Mon, February 27, 2012 12:10, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
>
>> Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All
>> that is
>> necessary is for several people use packages from
>> testing repo and
>> report that they are working without issues to the
>> Centos-deve
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 05:10:49PM +, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
>
>
> Several people have tested this successfully. You can even get slightly
> newer packages from here:
> http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice/el6/x86_64/ that Karanbir hasn't
> yet got around t
Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
> Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All that is
> necessary is for several people use packages from testing repo and
> report that they are working without issues to the Centos-devel mailing
> list in this thread:
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermai
On 02/27/2012 11:16 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 27.2.2012 10:10, wwp wrote:
>> Hello Johan,
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan
>> Vermeulen wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
>>> * I then have a Selinux module
>>>
On 27.2.2012 10:10, wwp wrote:
> Hello Johan,
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan Vermeulen
> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
>> * I then have a Selinux module
>> * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's m
Hello Johan,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan Vermeulen
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
> * I then have a Selinux module
> * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea,
> because I'd have to le
Dear All,
I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
* I then have a Selinux module
* Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea,
because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got i
23 matches
Mail list logo
