On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 12:54 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Damian S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, that MS article is just marketing fluff.
> > Here is a less biased viewpoint:
> > http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080425-study-70-percent-say-red-hat-more-sec
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Damian S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, that MS article is just marketing fluff.
> Here is a less biased viewpoint:
> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080425-study-70-percent-say-red-hat-more-secure-than-windows.html
>
> Its further interesting to note that
Hi, that MS article is just marketing fluff.
Here is a less biased viewpoint:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080425-study-70-percent-say-red-hat-more-secure-than-windows.html
Its further interesting to note that at a CanSecWest conference earlier
this year, researchers were given access to
ABBAS KHAN wrote:
Being as a Windows geek tho, I consider Linux as a more powerful server
operating system than Windows. When I saw OS comparison at
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/linux/server-security.mspx I
was shocked! Showed it to a friend and he felt like being brainwashed :D
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:00 PM, ABBAS KHAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Being as a Windows geek tho, I consider Linux as a more powerful server
> operating system than Windows. When I saw OS comparison at
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/linux/server-security.mspx I
> was shocked!
Being as a Windows geek tho, I consider Linux as a more powerful server
operating system than Windows. When I saw OS comparison at
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/linux/server-security.mspx I
was shocked! Showed it to a friend and he felt like being brainwashed :D
lol.
What do you fe
6 matches
Mail list logo
