On 7/14/10, William Warren wrote:
> On 7/14/2010 1:16 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>> Googling up a really old 2005 newsgroup thread says some people had 24
>> physical NIC (6x 4quad) in a system before and one person vaguely
>> remembers a hard 256 limit which would make sense if physical
>> i
On 07/13/2010 05:51 PM, William Warren wrote:
>I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
> anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
> interfaces in the Kernel?
Most of the limits on the number of any device come from the major/minor
numbers o
On 07/14/2010 10:30 AM, JohnS wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 08:52 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>
>
>> I've got six machines with 6 Gb interfaces (two on motherboard, 4 on a
>> card) right now (the design called for 3 bonded pairs on separate nets
>> for redundancy). I haven't tried IPV6 on th
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 08:52 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> I've got six machines with 6 Gb interfaces (two on motherboard, 4 on a
> card) right now (the design called for 3 bonded pairs on separate nets
> for redundancy). I haven't tried IPV6 on them. I had 'issues' with
> bonding and VMs tho
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:52:02AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> > Filed some bug reports, and it was evident from the response that very, very
> > few Linux users ever go> 4 eth's on a system. Thus the lack of properly
> > debugged IPv6 support for that then. Fortunately I don't (yet) need IPv6
On 07/14/2010 08:17 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:51:51AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
>
>
>> Even if the limit were lower, such as 10 physical interfaces as mentioned
>> before, I have to imagine that the host system would have issues dealing
>> with the number of interrupt
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:51:51AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
> Even if the limit were lower, such as 10 physical interfaces as mentioned
> before, I have to imagine that the host system would have issues dealing
> with the number of interrupts needed to *PROPERLY* service all of those
> interfaces
oun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Tim Nelson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 10:35 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit
>
> - "Brian T. Brunner" wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > &g
- "Brian T. Brunner" wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:58 PM
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject
On 7/14/2010 1:16 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 7/14/10, William Warren
> wrote:
>> ok let me specify. Is there any real limit? I've seen some folks(and
>> been told by a few) that you can't more than 10 physical interfaces in a
>> linux system.
> Googling up a really old 2005 newsgroup
- "Brian T. Brunner" wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:58 PM
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:58 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit
>
>
On 7/14/10, William Warren wrote:
> ok let me specify. Is there any real limit? I've seen some folks(and
> been told by a few) that you can't more than 10 physical interfaces in a
> linux system.
Googling up a really old 2005 newsgroup thread says some people had 24
physical NIC (6x 4quad) in a
On 7/13/2010 9:11 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>> 2010/7/14 William Warren:
>>> I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
>>> anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
>>> interfaces in the Kerne
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/7/14 William Warren :
>> I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
>> anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
>> interfaces in the Kernel?
>
> can you really create hardware with huge n
2010/7/14 William Warren :
> I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
> anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
> interfaces in the Kernel?
can you really create hardware with huge number or real ethernet controllers?
--
Eero
_
I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
interfaces in the Kernel?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
17 matches
Mail list logo
