On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:28 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 3. You have to compile the drivers from source. They require the kernel-devel
> package to be installed in order to compile, of course. But if you are
> running the PAE kernel, you need to install kernel-PAE-devel to compile
>
listmail wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:48:55 -0700, I wrote
I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel machine, and I am seeing
a load average of between 0.35 and 0.50 while the machine is idle, i.e.
no processes appear to be running.
Both top and uptime report the same thing. Looking at t
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:48:55 -0700, I wrote
> I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel machine, and I am seeing
> a load average of between 0.35 and 0.50 while the machine is idle, i.e.
> no processes appear to be running.
>
> Both top and uptime report the same thing. Looking at top, I can
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:00 AM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:20:53 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote
>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > OK, I downloaded the CentOS 5.2 Live CD and booted from it. To eliminate
>> > load fro
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:20:53 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I downloaded the CentOS 5.2 Live CD and booted from it. To eliminate
> > load from the GUI, I forced the system into runlevel 3 and ran top.
> > I see the sam
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:56:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrote
>> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:48 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel machine,
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:06:54 -0400, William Warren wrote
> the issue occurs even on a live cd so the machine's software load
> isn't suspect. It's the nics.
>
It sure does look like it. I submitted a bug to the CentOS bug tracker,
so hopefully someone better equipped than I to resolve this can d
the issue occurs even on a live cd so the machine's software load isn't
suspect. It's the nics.
Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez wrote:
William Warren escribió:
post it on the centos bug tracker to start..:)
listmail wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:56:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrote
Stephen John Smo
William Warren escribió:
post it on the centos bug tracker to start..:)
listmail wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:56:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrote
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:48 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel ma
post it on the centos bug tracker to start..:)
listmail wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:56:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrote
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:48 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel machine, and I am seeing
a
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:56:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrote
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:48 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel machine, and I am seeing
> >> a load average of between 0.35 and 0.50 while the
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:48 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel machine, and I am seeing
a load average of between 0.35 and 0.50 while the machine is idle, i.e.
no processes appear to be running.
Download
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:48 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel machine, and I am seeing
> a load average of between 0.35 and 0.50 while the machine is idle, i.e.
> no processes appear to be running.
>
Download the livecd and boot using it. Se
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 16:54 -0700, listmail wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:28:55 -0400, Dan Halbert wrote
> > listmail wrote:
> > >it has the same problem: load average 0.4 when idle.
> >
> > If you disconnect or shut down the NIC(s), does that make any difference?
> >
> Good suggestion. Disconn
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:32:42 -0400, Dan Halbert wrote
> You mentioned these are Supermicro X7DBN boards. They use the Intel
>
> (ESB2/Gilgal) 82563EB Dual-Port Gigabit Ethernet Controller. There's
> an open bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403121,
> "e1000: issues with Intel
You mentioned these are Supermicro X7DBN boards. They use the Intel
(ESB2/Gilgal) 82563EB Dual-Port Gigabit Ethernet Controller. There's an
open bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403121,
"e1000: issues with Intel ESB2/Gilgal (82563EB)". It doesn't describe
your problem, but
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:22:29 -0700 (PDT), Mark Pryor wrote
> --- On Sat, 7/19/08, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> the ht flag means the cpu supports hyperthreading
> lm means that you can run 64 bit.
>
> By the way, is it an i386 kernel?
>
Yes, it's the i386 kernel.
> I've seen only o
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:26:24 -0400, Dan Halbert wrote
> listmail wrote:
> > Good suggestion. Disconnecting the Ethernet cables from the NICs did not
> > make a difference. However, shutting down the interfaces (e.g ifdown eth0,
> > ifdown eth1) did cut the load average down to nothing (0.00).
> >
>
listmail wrote:
Good suggestion. Disconnecting the Ethernet cables from the NICs did not
make a difference. However, shutting down the interfaces (e.g ifdown eth0,
ifdown eth1) did cut the load average down to nothing (0.00).
So it wasn't actual traffic, but something that the interfaces were do
--- On Sat, 7/19/08, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Load Average ~0.40 when idle
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Date: Saturday, July 19, 2008, 4:27 PM
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:04:17 -0700 (
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:28:55 -0400, Dan Halbert wrote
> listmail wrote:
> >it has the same problem: load average 0.4 when idle.
>
> If you disconnect or shut down the NIC(s), does that make any difference?
>
Good suggestion. Disconnecting the Ethernet cables from the NICs did not
make a differenc
listmail wrote:
>it has the same problem: load average 0.4 when idle.
If you disconnect or shut down the NIC(s), does that make any difference?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:04:17 -0700 (PDT), Mark Pryor wrote
> > Replying to my own post as a follow-up. I just checked
> > another machine that
> > I am burning in with CentOS 5.2, and it has the same
> > problem: load average
> > ~0.4 when idle. Both of these machines have Supermicro
> > X7DBN moth
> Replying to my own post as a follow-up. I just checked
> another machine that
> I am burning in with CentOS 5.2, and it has the same
> problem: load average
> ~0.4 when idle. Both of these machines have Supermicro
> X7DBN motherboards,
> but one is running a single quad-core CPU (Intel Xeon) a
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:21:44 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote
> listmail wrote:
>
>
>
> Are you running X ... how many processes (on average are running).
>
> Running X and logged in with applets and such, I have this:
> ===
> top - 17:18:49 up
listmail wrote:
Are you running X ... how many processes (on average are running).
Running X and logged in with applets and such, I have this:
===
top - 17:18:49 up 4:13, 3 users, load average: 0.15, 0.27, 0.32
Tasks: 153 total, 2 ru
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:50:18 -0700, listmail wrote
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:58:15 -0700 (PDT), Mark Pryor wrote
> > --- On Sat, 7/19/08, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > From: listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: [CentOS] Load Aver
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:58:15 -0700 (PDT), Mark Pryor wrote
> --- On Sat, 7/19/08, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [CentOS] Load Average ~0.40 when idle
> > To: "CentOS mailing list"
>
--- On Sat, 7/19/08, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [CentOS] Load Average ~0.40 when idle
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Date: Saturday, July 19, 2008, 1:48 PM
> I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core
I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel machine, and I am seeing
a load average of between 0.35 and 0.50 while the machine is idle, i.e.
no processes appear to be running.
Both top and uptime report the same thing. Looking at top, I cannot see
any processes that are using CPU time except
30 matches
Mail list logo
