Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?

2015-03-26 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 03/26/2015 05:01 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> It's not so much a matter of having a "view" of CR as that I didn't >>> expect things to appear in EPEL that depend on base versions that >>> aren't in general release yet. Is that intenti

Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?

2015-03-26 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >> It's not so much a matter of having a "view" of CR as that I didn't >> expect things to appear in EPEL that depend on base versions that >> aren't in general release yet. Is that intentional, and don't some >> number of people have to a

Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?

2015-03-26 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 03/26/2015 04:47 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Richard > wrote: >> > Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The > libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway. Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr". >>> >>> So...

Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?

2015-03-26 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 03/26/2015 04:05 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Does anyone know what's up with: > > Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) >Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit) > > Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos? > EPEL is built against RHEL, not CentOS (I am fairly certa

Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?

2015-03-26 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Richard wrote: > Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway. >>> >>> Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr". >> >> So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to upd

Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?

2015-03-26 Thread Richard
Original Message > Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:32:12 -0500 > From: Les Mikesell > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Richard > wrote: >> >> >> Original Message >>> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 >>> From: Les Mikesell >

Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?

2015-03-26 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Richard wrote: > > > Original Message >> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 >> From: Les Mikesell >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Cc: >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency

Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?

2015-03-26 Thread Richard
Original Message > Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 > From: Les Mikesell > To: CentOS mailing list > Cc: > Subject: Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency? > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard > wrote: >> >>&g

Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?

2015-03-26 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard wrote: > >> >> Does anyone know what's up with: >> >> Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) >>Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit) >> >> Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos? > > > Check epel-testing, that's where it (stil

Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?

2015-03-26 Thread Richard
Original Message > Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:05:16 -0500 > From: Les Mikesell > To: CentOS > Subject: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency? > > Does anyone know what's up with: > > Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) >

[CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?

2015-03-26 Thread Les Mikesell
Does anyone know what's up with: Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit) Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list Ce