In article ,
Luke S Crawford wrote:
>Have you tried memtest86?
No, but if that was the problem it wouldn't have failed the same
way each time.
I finally got some time to deal with this today. I tried several
more things and finally made it work by installing a BIOS update.
Sure feals nice t
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Victor Padro wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Louis Lagendijk
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 19:27 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>> > Rick wrote:
>> > > In article <20090308031754.ga11...@bludgeon.org>,
>> > > Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Louis Lagendijk
wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 19:27 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> > Rick wrote:
> > > In article <20090308031754.ga11...@bludgeon.org>,
> > > Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> That sounds pretty strange. Have you confirmed that removing th
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 19:27 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Rick wrote:
> > In article <20090308031754.ga11...@bludgeon.org>,
> > Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >
> >
> >> That sounds pretty strange. Have you confirmed that removing the "new"
> >> memory allows you to run in runlevel 5 again?
> >>
Bill Campbell writes:
> I usually go to the Kingston site to find the proper memory for
> specific main boards, and get most of our RAM from newegg.com.
>
> http://www.kingston.com
>
> http://www.newegg.com
I second this, except that I find Kingston often has the best price for
ram,
Rick wrote:
> In article <12768.4492654682$1236586...@news.gmane.org>,
> Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
>> If the motherboard supports dual-channel configs, one might want to take
>> care
>> how one distributes the different mem-sticks in the banks. Eg the 2GB-sticks
>> in bank 1 and 3 and the 4GB-sticks
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009, John R Pierce wrote:
...
>ok, then you have the wrong 4GB (2x2GB?) sticks. You might review the
>memory specs for your motherboard, not all DDR2 is the same.
>http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/d975xbx/sb/CS-026567.htm
I usually go to the Kingston site to fi
William L. Maltby wrote:
> So, if you've got the leeway, try manually bumping the voltage for the
> unit a couple of tenths. Risk is low, but it is there.
>
The OP said earlier he has an Intel D975XBX motherboard. Intel boards
are very conservatively engineered, and don't have tweaks for
ov
Rick wrote:
> In article ,
> MHR wrote:
>
>
>> 2) Your answer above was not clear: did the 4GB work by itself without
>> the other 2GB? If so, the above is your problem. If not, you're in
>> deeper guano that you think, BUT:
>>
>
> The 4GB had the same problem with and without the 2GB.
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 12:14 +0100, Morten Torstensen wrote:
> On 09.03.2009 11:09, Rick wrote:
> > Well, yeah, of course. But even if I got that wrong, the 4GB alone did not
> > work in the same slots the 2GB sticks were in.
>
> So, either the memory sticks are bad (one or two of them), or the me
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Morten Torstensen
>Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 12:14 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memory vs. Display Card
>
>> Well, yeah, of course. B
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Rick
>Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 11:10 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memory vs. Display Card
>
>>If the motherboard supports dual-channel
On 09.03.2009 11:09, Rick wrote:
> Well, yeah, of course. But even if I got that wrong, the 4GB alone did not
> work in the same slots the 2GB sticks were in.
So, either the memory sticks are bad (one or two of them), or the memory
have bad timing in some way making them not compatible with the m
In article <12768.4492654682$1236586...@news.gmane.org>,
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>If the motherboard supports dual-channel configs, one might want to take care
>how one distributes the different mem-sticks in the banks. Eg the 2GB-sticks
>in bank 1 and 3 and the 4GB-sticks in banks 2 and 4.
Well, ye
In article ,
MHR wrote:
>2) Your answer above was not clear: did the 4GB work by itself without
>the other 2GB? If so, the above is your problem. If not, you're in
>deeper guano that you think, BUT:
The 4GB had the same problem with and without the 2GB.
>Also, by "running in 64-bit mode" (pr
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of MHR
>Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:20 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memory vs. Display Card
>
>3) Some motherboards (many) will not accept
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Rick wrote:
> In article <49b47e99.1090...@hogranch.com>,
> John R Pierce wrote:
>
>>now, try taking out the OLD memory and putting in just the NEW memory.
>>see how it runs that way. if this works, try with the new 4GB as the 0
>>bank, and the old 2GB as the 1
In article <49b47e99.1090...@hogranch.com>,
John R Pierce wrote:
>now, try taking out the OLD memory and putting in just the NEW memory.
>see how it runs that way. if this works, try with the new 4GB as the 0
>bank, and the old 2GB as the 1 bank.
Tried that before I posted and got the same
Rick wrote:
> In article <20090308031754.ga11...@bludgeon.org>,
> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>
>
>> That sounds pretty strange. Have you confirmed that removing the "new"
>> memory allows you to run in runlevel 5 again?
>>
>
> Yes, that's how I'm running right now.
>
now, try taking out t
In article <1236521803.29529.43.ca...@poq1.tabb.loc>,
Phil Schaffner wrote:
>Lots of good suggestions, but this would seem to be a likely cause, and
>easiest to check. If you are running i386 you need a PAE kernel.
I thought of that. But I'm running 64 bit mode.
__
In article <20090308031754.ga11...@bludgeon.org>,
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>That sounds pretty strange. Have you confirmed that removing the "new"
>memory allows you to run in runlevel 5 again?
Yes, that's how I'm running right now.
___
CentOS mailing
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 09:16 -0400, Richard Karhuse wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Rick wrote:
> > Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2
> > GB
...
> Forth, what (precisely) CentOS kernel are you booting?? Does it
> support greater than 4 GB of RAM??
Lots
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Rick wrote:
> Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB
> to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to
> run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system
> froze. Is there a way to fix thi
Rick writes:
> Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB
> to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to
> run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system
> froze. Is there a way to fix this so I can use the memory I bou
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 03:00:59AM +, Rick wrote:
> Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB
> to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to
> run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system
> froze. Is there a way to
Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB
to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to
run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system
froze. Is there a way to fix this so I can use the memory I bought? Do
I need a new di
26 matches
Mail list logo
